And therein lies the internet scientific expert's credentials. I ain't watchin no long video, I already knows what I bleeve.Not watching a 23 min video
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And therein lies the internet scientific expert's credentials. I ain't watchin no long video, I already knows what I bleeve.Not watching a 23 min video
CO2 does have some effects on the environment, some beautiful, wonderful, effects. CO2 gives life to trees, grass, flowers, plankton, and just about every living thing on earth. CO2 is life.I did state she MODERATED her position yes; she thinks CO2 has some effects so do I, but I see no danger and neither does she which she makes clear over and over in her blog.
But Man-made warming claims she disputes since NO ONE has shown that Humans cause all the warming, but it can be shown quite easily that we contribute a small amount and nothing more.
Go read those postings I gave you where it shows she isn't toeing the climate emergency/we are doomed message; it is all bullshit!
CO2 does have some effects on the environment, some beautiful, wonderful, effects. CO2 gives life to trees, grass, flowers, plankton, and just about every living thing on earth. CO2 is life.
We're not an Oxygen dependent life form nearly as much as we are a Carbon-dioxide dependent life form. Oxygen is what we breathe but CO2 feeds the plants that make the oxygen so, up to that point, they're even. Then consider that we also eat plants, and we eat animals that eat the plants, and we eat animals that eat the animals that eat the plants, that plant life is extremely important and it is dependent on CO2. In overall importance,
CO2 is far more central to our existence than is Oxygen.
Judith Curry?? Too funny~
Judith Curry abandons science
But I’m glad the GOP chose her as a witness for a climate hearingarchive.thinkprogress.org
Climate misinformation by source: Judith Curry
Examines the science and arguments of global warming skepticism. Common objections like 'global warming is caused by the sun', 'temperature has changed naturally in the past' or 'other planets are warming too' are examined to see what the science really says.skepticalscience.com
Dr. Judith Curry resigns - CFACT
Dr. Judith Curry, a respected climate scientist, has announced her resignation from her tenured position at Georgia Tech. She's had enough of the politics and propaganda that beset climate science.www.cfact.org
Climate Etc – Judith Curry - Bias and Credibility
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.mediabiasfactcheck.com
Judith Curry owns Climate Etc. Donations fund the website.
Analysis / Bias
The majority of articles reviewed minimize or deny the impacts of human-driven climate change. According to a Scientific American interview, Judith Curry admits to receiving funding from the fossil fuel industry. This article also labeled her a “climate heretic.” Further, Republicans have also invited Judith Curry to testify at climate change hearings regarding alleged uncertainties regarding man-made climate change. Finally, Skeptical Science has labeled Judith Curry as a “Climate Misinformer.”
The website publishes blog posts by Judith Curry related to climate change, and they provide links to other sources that also promote human-influenced climate change denial, such as Watts Up With That and John Stossel who is not even remotely a climate scientist. The consensus of climate scientists is that climate change is human-influenced and this site minimizes that assessment. They have also failed numerous fact checks.
Failed Fact Checks
- “The Earth is not warming.” – Pants on Fire
- “It is an empirical fact that the Earth’s climate has warmed overall for at least the past century. However, we do not know how much humans have contributed to this warming, and there is disagreement among scientists as to whether human-caused emissions of greenhouse gases is the dominant cause of recent warming, relative to natural causes” – Misleading
- “And even the IPCC says more than half. That’s from 51 percent to 99 percent. That is a big interval… I just don’t know how much is human vs. how much is natural, and I think there is a great deal of uncertainty and it is very difficult to untangle it” – Incorrect
- “Current global climate models are not fit for the purpose of attributing the causes of recent warming or for predicting global or regional climate change on timescales of decades to centuries, with any high level of confidence.” – Incorrect
- “It’s been warming for hundreds of years! And we can’t explain all of that due to human causes..” – Misleading
Ummmm, no. CO2 makes life worth living. With no O2, there IS no life.
At least, not as we know it.