The industrial world of the twentieth century needed people

Ringo

Gold Member
Jun 14, 2021
11,365
4,613
208
Over there
The industrial world of the twentieth century, the world of the past - had its dark sides, there were many problems with it,
but you can't deny him one thing: he needed people.

He lived based on the idea that every person can find some rational occupation,
and every territory or country needs to be developed,
and do something everywhere, produce something tangible, useful.
And in any Syria, Libya, Iraq, Venezuela, not to mention more serious countries, well, literally everywhere then, young majors and colonels, presidents and fathers of the nation, came to power - and built factories, built roads, pulled the provinces to the level of big cities, taught people to become engineers and doctors, created tank brigades, tried to reach the American, German, and even the Soviet standard.
In a word, the norm arose everywhere. There was uniformity everywhere.
Common sense arose everywhere.
It was too much sometimes, somewhere it was cruel, and somewhere unsuccessful, but - it was.
The whole world was like that.
And then something subtly, gradually, tragically changed.
Most likely, the fateful moment was the eighties, when for the first time it turned out that it was more profitable to entertain than to produce, it was more profitable to speculate in numbers than to trade goods, and it was more profitable to manage chaos, than to manage collectives of people.
And then the old world - it doesn't matter whether capitalist or socialist, dictatorial, democratic, in the name of the nation, in the name of the class, in the name of whatever you want - went from the fair. And in his place sat some new, and very unpleasant creature, which since then has only swelled on its throne, and only grows stronger.
The creature only wants customers, but not workers
only adolescents, but not adults,
only financial instruments, but not things
only corporations, but not the state,
only nomads, but not the locals
only mercenaries, but not the regular army,
only the megapolis, but not the country
only genders, but not of family
only a minority, but not a majority,
only exotic, but not the norm.
Only emotions, but not common sense.
And now we see at every step, the sad waste of this nasty creature's vital activity.

For example, migrants living somewhere in a tent camp or sailing on a boat towards civilization - what's the trouble with them?
And the trouble is that migrants are important for the new civilization exactly to the extent that they migrate, do not sow, do not plow, only migrate, and ideally, they should migrate forever, producing reasons to talk about multiculturalism, xenophobia, humanity, the damned imperial heritage, identities and similar official waste paper.
But if any of them stayed at home - in a conditional Iraq, Tajikistan, it doesn't matter - and would timidly ask the modern world:
- Maybe I'd rather work here at the factory around the corner?
- Maybe I'll become a teacher, and they'll give me an apartment?
- Maybe I'll go to military service, I'll get to the commander of the regiment?
- Maybe we will build a power plant, make cars, defend dissertations?

The modern world would laugh in the face of a fool.

Your factory is inefficient, we will stuff all the factories in the world into one Bangladesh.
We will reduce teachers if necessary - we have online courses in psychology and design.
The army is violence, and violence is evil. Something will happen - we will send drones, bomb a couple of sheds and say that freedom has won.
Your power plants harm nature, cars - moreover, we can give you a scooter, and
as for dissertations, we will do so:
Dress up in rags, dirty ones, jump into a boat, swim to us, sit down on the ground in the middle of the street, mutter something incomprehensible - preferably spells in case of human sacrifice. How is there no such thing? What Shakespeare? Come on, come up with spells! - and tell me how everyone has offended you, how you suffer, and we will write you an allowance, so that you continue to sit on the ground in the middle of the street.
And at the same time, we will defend our dissertation on the transgressive aspects of the non-binary discourse of postcolonial identities.
Have you learned? Go look for dirty rags!

Because a person no longer has any value at home, at work, that lasted for decades, on his land, in his country, among everything stable, regular and uniform...
He, a human, has to run to some place, which is now assigned to him for a new life, and there he will either be lucky - and he will take online courses in psychology and design, that is, he will produce emptiness, or he will not be lucky - and then he can count on benefits, sitting on the ground in torn dirty rags.
Well, there is also a cleaning service if the ground is too dirty.

Eternal memory to you, Comrade Colonel, or Colonel, sir!
Eternal memory to you, a factory or power plant, a road, a school, a car, and even a tank brigade.
Eternal memory, norm and common sense to you!
Capitalism doesn't need people anymore. Too many useless and not profitable.
 
Any metropolis will need Labor.
Robots and the staff serving them. "The golden billion" is all that modern capitalism needs. Everyone else is superfluous on Earth. Ask any environmentalist and proponent of the theory of climate change because of nasty, useless people of Earth, who can also arrange a revolution and deprive the capitalists of their priceless property.
And to get rid of the excess population, Capital has proven ways - Fascism and Nazism. Especially effective due to the lack of socialism
 
There is always something for the People to do. Post port operations are one example. Scale economies can only help operations not hinder them; and, such operations can be scaled to meet demand.
 
Those who believe that the leaders of capitalism want some kind of neo-feudalism or even slavery are very optimistic, Capital needs people in any capacity less and less.
It was about this, that the grandiose battle of the 20th century - 70 years - between socialism and capitalism was about - who in the 21st century will enjoy the fruits of the latest automation - every person or a bunch of psychopaths crazy on bitcoin wrappers. Will these psychopaths be able to turn on bioreactors to destroy the "superfluous" humanity?
I have a simple question, what to do for those whom Capital will inevitably leave behind? Should I hang myself now or prepare for life in Mogadishu?
 
Robots and the staff serving them. "The golden billion" is all that modern capitalism needs. Everyone else is superfluous on Earth. Ask any environmentalist and proponent of the theory of climate change because of nasty, useless people of Earth, who can also arrange a revolution and deprive the capitalists of their priceless property.
And to get rid of the excess population, Capital has proven ways - Fascism and Nazism. Especially effective due to the lack of socialism
I think what people are slowing beginning to realize is that Capital needs labor more than labor needs capital. So much effort over the last 100 years has been devoted to contradicting what Henry Ford knew all along. I know, the story goes he paid his employees five dollars a day so they could afford the cars they were producing. But that is not true, Ford went from $2.25 a day to five dollars because of TURNOVER.

Hello, Howdy. What is the complaint now? Companies can't get workers. Workers quit, all the time. Shortage of labor. In retail, a hundred percent turnover is the norm. WTF? Procuring employees, training employees--that shit costs money. Even Walmart, their "churn cost", that is the cost of procuring, replacing, and training employees, is some where between 1.5 and 2.5 times the replaced employees salary. I mean it don't take a rocket scientist to figure out if your churn cost is that high, and your turnover rate exceeds a hundred percent, you are losing your ass. But evidently, Walmart, the most penny wise and pound foolish company I have ever had experience with, not only can't figure that out, they do their best to hide it.

They measure their turnover rate with 90 day periods. While they might post a turnover rate of 110% to their shareholders, that is over ninety days. The norm is to measure turnover by the year. At Walmart that can easily exceed 200%. Look at it this way, for every Walmart employee with fifteen years of service I can promise you, 30 people quit. Probably closer to 300.

But that is just Human Resources basics. You pay employees well, better than the competition, and you treat them well. But what company does that? I mean there are a handful of companies with a turnover rate in the single digits. Some might surprise you. Intel, Cisco, SAS--no surprise there. But what about WM Wrigley, yes, the chewing gum company. A four percent turnover rate, one third of their employees have more than 15 years of service. Somehow, I don't think it is the free chewing gum.

Wrigley is a privately held company, within Mars, Incorporated. Privately held companies have the luxury of taking the long term view while public companies can't see past the next quarter. So back to the preface, capital needs labor more than labor needs capital and privately held companies continue to make that case.
 

Forum List

Back
Top