The great global warming fraud

I document reality for you, but if your ideological dogma is impervious to empirical data, your blind faith will continue to be unshakeable.
You have no concept of reality. Your entire life revolves around fantasies.
 
You have no concept of reality. Your entire life revolves around fantasies.
Your abject groveling before your repugnant master is devoid of the supportive data that is needed to sustain the articles of faith you mindlessly spout. His surrender to China in the growing clean energy technology market is furthered by his instigating the soaring price of the dirty fuels he promotes.

Screen Shot 2026-03-18 at 7.38.07 AM.webp


The global progress toward clean energy advances, enhanced by your increasingly-unpopular Orange Tojo's instigating the ongoing surge in gasoline prices.

Spouting your hollow, cloying paeans cannot change the truth. Where is your empirical data?




 
Your abject groveling before your repugnant master is devoid of the supportive data that is needed to sustain the articles of faith you mindlessly spout. His surrender to China in the growing clean energy technology market is furthered by his instigating the soaring price of the dirty fuels he promotes.


The global progress toward clean energy advances, enhanced by your increasingly-unpopular Orange Tojo's instigating the ongoing surge in gasoline prices.

Spouting your hollow, cloying paeans cannot change the truth. Where is your empirical data?




Which has what to do with anything other than your divorce from reality?
 
Which has what to do with anything other than your divorce from reality?
Your sustained impotence in concocting credible data to prop up your dogma is inescapable. No matter how manic your pom-pom flailing, the facts are undeniable.

Trump's failures are documented by empirical data from multiple credible, corroborative sources, are reflected in public survey after public survey, and your denial of the facts merely confirms your impotence in the realm of reality.

Facts are formidable, and your adoration cannot refute them - e.g., Trump's driving the $2. 98 average price for a gallon of gasoline in America to $4,56 today, as a consequence of his "Pearl Harbor" attack in the Middle East that has cost the American taxpayer $88 billion so far, seriously depleted the U.S. military arsenal, and left the same regime in power in Tehran, in possession of its nuclear materials stockpile, and now wreaking havoc on the global economy.
 
Last edited:
Your sustained impotence in concocting credible data to prop up your dogma is inescapable. No matter how manic your pom-pom flailing, the data is undeniable.

Trump's failures are documented by empirical data from multiple credible, corroborative sources, are reflected in public survey after public survey, and your denial of the facts merely confirms your impotence in the realm of reality.

Facts are formidable, and your adoration cannot refute them - e.g., Trump's driving the $2. 98 average price for a gallon of gasoline in America to $4,56 today, as a consequence of his "Pearl Harbor" attack in the Middle East that has cost the American taxpayer $$88 billion so far, left the same regime in power in Tehran, in possession of its nuclear materials stockpile, and now wreaking havoc on the global economy.
More words from you that mean nothing. Brevity is a sign of intelligence. Not word salads.
 
More words from you that mean nothing. Brevity is a sign of intelligence. Not word salads.
If you are unable to succinctly cite empirical data compiled and analyzed by qualified climatologists that comports with your ideological dogma, I'm not surprised.

Virtually all nations on earth respect the science, and virtually all the more advanced ones act accordingly, if not always expeditiously. Thus, the ineluctable progress that is occurring.


Europe has made record-breaking strides in clean energy deployment, with renewables now dominating electricity generation and energy efficiency investments surging.
In 2024, 47% of EU electricity came from solar and other renewables, with solar overtaking coal for the first time and clean wind surpassing gas for the second consecutive year AP News
 
by qualified climatologists



and by "qualified climatologists" you mean left wing flops from other areas of science that fudge data, lie, and cannot answer really basic climate questions...


 
and by "qualified climatologists" you mean left wing flops from other areas of science that fudge data, lie, and cannot answer really basic climate questions...


There is zero evidence CO2 makes the earth warmer. Even the UN is now backing away from its dire predictions. The climate change ideology, not science, has lost all credibility. Renewable energy is withering on the vine of fake science and bold faced lies. High costs, shortages failure to meet demand, destruction to the environment, massive bankruptcies, canceled wind turbines, and the rebirth of nuclear technology have made renewable energy obsolete.
 
and by "qualified climatologists" you mean left wing flops from other areas of science that fudge data, lie, and cannot answer really basic climate questions...

Your need to falsify is blatant. It is a scientific, not an ideological matter.

By "qualified climatologists," I mean all the accredited members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, thirty-four national science academies, the World Meteorological Organization, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that recognize climate change as caused by human activity - research institutes, and professional societies such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Chemical Society, and the European Space Agency, etc., etc., etc.

If you are aware of any scientific authority, anywhere, that reflects the denial of ideologues, please identify it and the empirical data upon which it bases its dissent.

If you unable to do so, can you honestly admit it?

Are there any other scientific disciplines concerning which you maintain aberrant views?
 
There is zero evidence CO2 makes the earth warmer


Correct, although adding mass to atmosphere would, which for CO2 is not statistically significant, and the actual act of taking hydrocarbons from land and burning them actually adds a C (12) and subtracts an O (16), which actually reduces atmospheric mass slightly.




The climate change ideology, not science, has lost all credibility


Please use "Global Warming ideology."

Climate Change is a science.

Global Warming is a theory that CO2 is the variable responsible for Earth climate change, and it is 100% wrong.
 
I mean all the



fudgebaking science flops who cannot answer the same questions you just refused yourself.


Amazing in year 6 of Trump we still haven't gotten this out of DOJ yet... because of horrific selections for AG.... plus Chris Wray.








and if they ever get to it, you will be outed as a parroting moron science invalid, which is really what you are.
 
fudgebaking science flops who cannot answer the same questions you just refused yourself.


Amazing in year 6 of Trump we still haven't gotten this out of DOJ yet... because of horrific selections for AG.... plus Chris Wray.








and if they ever get to it, you will be outed as a parroting moron science invalid, which is really what you are.
Do you reject science whenever it contradicts your ideological dogma?

Again, are there other scientific disciplines for which you have contempt?
 
If you are unable to succinctly cite empirical data compiled and analyzed by qualified climatologists that comports with your ideological dogma, I'm not surprised.

Virtually all nations on earth respect the science, and virtually all the more advanced ones act accordingly, if not always expeditiously. Thus, the ineluctable progress that is occurring.


Europe has made record-breaking strides in clean energy deployment, with renewables now dominating electricity generation and energy efficiency investments surging.
In 2024, 47% of EU electricity came from solar and other renewables, with solar overtaking coal for the first time and clean wind surpassing gas for the second consecutive year AP News
It's you who are unable to cite anything meaningful to support your claims.
 
I practice science. Your heroes cannot refute my practice of science.

You do not practice science. You parrot. You have no clue about anything.
As in other scientific disciplines, I respect the data compilation and corroborative analysis by climatologists. I do not pretend that I have superior knowledge in their fields.

If you like to fancy that you know more about, i.e., herpetology than herpetologists, that is your privilege, of course.


Trump: “Nobody Knows More About Knowing More About Everything Than I Do!”

 
15th post
As in other scientific disciplines, I respect the data compilation and corroborative analysis by climatologists. I do not pretend that I have superior knowledge in their fields.

If you like to fancy that you know more about, i.e., herpetology than herpetologists, that is your privilege, of course.


Trump: “Nobody Knows More About Knowing More About Everything Than I Do!”

So, you know nothing, yet believe everything your high priests tell you.

Sounds culty to me.
 
See any of the previously-cited scientific sources.
None of which are based on empirical data.

In fact they are almost all based on that protocol that the IPCC now admits is garbage.

You've been played for decades, and you're too uneducated to understand it.

Sad.
 
None of which are based on empirical data.

In fact they are almost all based on that protocol that the IPCC now admits is garbage.

You've been played for decades, and you're too uneducated to understand it.

Sad.
You are a science denier,
 
You are a science denier,
No, skippy. That would be you. You can't even understand the importance of the scientific method, so you spew logical fallacies by the trainload.
 
Back
Top Bottom