1. Modesty prevents me from revealing the wise wonk who noted this about Democrat methodology:
Second only to lies, hypocrisy is their most often empoyed method.
2. Now we turn to this lesson from 'governor'Abrams.
She also laughably claimed she has never refused to acknowledge the results of an election.
“I will always acknowledge the legal outcome of an election,” Abrams said. “I have never failed to do that.”
Abrams failed to concede the governor’s race to Kemp in 2018, saying at the time that a concession would be an acknowledgment that the outcome was “right and true and proper.” She made the same tiresome accusations of voter fraud, although nearly four years later she cannot provide any evidence to support the claim. In fact, Abrams was notably absent when President Joe Biden made a January appearance in Georgia to speak on the matter of voting rights, her signature platitude.
“I acknowledge that former Secretary of State Brian Kemp will be certified as the victor in the 2018 gubernatorial election,” Abrams said in 2018 in a speech following her loss. “But to watch an elected official – who claims to represent the people of this state, baldly pin his hopes for election on the suppression of the people’s democratic right to vote – has been truly appalling.”
“So, to be clear, this is not a speech of concession,” she continued.
...Abrams dismissed the suggestion that her refusal to concede her race is akin to Trump’s lawsuits against various election bodies following the 2020 presidential election.
“What Trump has done is invalidate systems because he didn’t like the personal effect,” she said. "
www.bizpacreview.com
3. As we learned from the prescient and brilliant George Orwell, whose books have become "history in advance,"
Second only to lies, hypocrisy is their most often empoyed method.
2. Now we turn to this lesson from 'governor'Abrams.
"Stacey Abrams explains why it’s ok for her not to concede an election, but not Trump
...she has yet to concede the 2018 election which she lost to now-Governor Brian Kemp.
...Abrams was asked if her refusal to concede the 2018 election had perhaps emboldened then-President Donald Trump to question the results of the 2020 presidential election, to which she replied, “I don’t ever want us to be in a place as Americans where we cannot legitimately question and critique systems and try to make them better.”She also laughably claimed she has never refused to acknowledge the results of an election.
“I will always acknowledge the legal outcome of an election,” Abrams said. “I have never failed to do that.”
Abrams failed to concede the governor’s race to Kemp in 2018, saying at the time that a concession would be an acknowledgment that the outcome was “right and true and proper.” She made the same tiresome accusations of voter fraud, although nearly four years later she cannot provide any evidence to support the claim. In fact, Abrams was notably absent when President Joe Biden made a January appearance in Georgia to speak on the matter of voting rights, her signature platitude.
“I acknowledge that former Secretary of State Brian Kemp will be certified as the victor in the 2018 gubernatorial election,” Abrams said in 2018 in a speech following her loss. “But to watch an elected official – who claims to represent the people of this state, baldly pin his hopes for election on the suppression of the people’s democratic right to vote – has been truly appalling.”
“So, to be clear, this is not a speech of concession,” she continued.
...Abrams dismissed the suggestion that her refusal to concede her race is akin to Trump’s lawsuits against various election bodies following the 2020 presidential election.
“What Trump has done is invalidate systems because he didn’t like the personal effect,” she said. "
Stacey Abrams explains why it's ok for her not to concede an election, but not Trump
Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, said she'll accept the results and "acknowledge the victor" of the forthcoming 2022 election
www.bizpacreview.com
3. As we learned from the prescient and brilliant George Orwell, whose books have become "history in advance,"
