Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Very funny. That's like saying the Earth would be flat were it not for being round. The primaries exist to narrow the field down to one candidate who will run against the selection from the other half of the corporate duopoly. If the GOP really wanted a Powell or a Cain it would selected a Powell or a Cain as its presidential candidate through its primary process.Why are you pretending that the gop would not have elected Powell or Cain, if they had won the primaries?
It was on both sides as always, ergo "Corporate Duopoly" - THINK about it, numbnuts.What you Tea Party nuts have never grasped is that you're just willing tools. Putty in the hands of the corporate elite who brought us the first Hollywood President, Reagan, to bash government as though no government was ever an option. Meanwhile, that same corporate elite buys all the government they possibly can, for fun and profit, at our expense. All now culminating in Trump. A two bit crook openly destroying government and us all, as best he can manage, thanks to nincompoops like you.
Dude. The Big Money is AGAINST Trump. They were on Hillary's side in the last election.
It remains the main reason, logically, unless and until you can demonstrate otherwise.Your position, seems to be that "racism" is the reason for the lack of black republican Presidents.
Only hypothetically. In reality, they've come up short.Pointing out that polls show that the gop voters would have happily supported various black republicans for the office, refutes that claim.
Granted. Initially. Then they chose Trump. At least you admit to the "big money" being on both sides.The big money wanted Hillary on your side, and Jeb Bush on our side.
Well congrats on electing our first billionaire President, you self-deluded moron.I'm proud that on our side, the pitchfork and torch bearing mob won, and the elite lost.
It remains the main reason, logically, unless and until you can demonstrate otherwise.Your position, seems to be that "racism" is the reason for the lack of black republican Presidents.
Only hypothetically. In reality, they've come up short.Pointing out that polls show that the gop voters would have happily supported various black republicans for the office, refutes that claim.
Granted. Initially. Then they chose Trump. At least you admit to the "big money" being on both sides.The big money wanted Hillary on your side, and Jeb Bush on our side.
Well congrats on electing our first billionaire President, you self-deluded moron.I'm proud that on our side, the pitchfork and torch bearing mob won, and the elite lost.
Yes, you pose lots of (stupid, loaded) questions while continuing to provide zero logic or evidence to back your wild assertions and accusations. In short, you remain a complete waste of time.
Sure, sure. Read and weep:THe big money was against Trump and thought they had a win in hand, right up until election night
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/shutterstock_196597034-5bfc3b3c46e0fb0083c49223.jpg)
www.theguardian.com
Sure, sure. Read and weep:THe big money was against Trump and thought they had a win in hand, right up until election night
Top Donors to the Trump 2020 Campaign
Listing the mega-backers to former President Trump's reelection campaign.www.investopedia.com
Are You Inadvertently Supporting Trump’s Re-Election? - Chatelaine
Many U.S. companies that operate or sell their products in Canada either directly or indirectly support President Donald Trump.www.chatelaine.com
How Trump's business empire is cashing in on the 2020 campaign
Watchdogs and public records reveal how Trump properties have raked in millions from Pacs and Republican figures
www.nbcnews.com
Wake up, white boy.At the outset of Donald Trump’s bid for the White House, he blasted super PACs on Twitter as “scams” and “unfair” and disavowed such outside help.
Then he changed his tune. By the end of his 2016 campaign, more than a hundred super PACs and similar groups had spent more than $72 million on his behalf, helping him defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton.
After running an unconventional and underfunded campaign in 2016 but receiving free media attention valued at about $5 billion, Trump’s reelection campaign looks to be flush with cash. Having declared his 2020 bid the day he took office, Trump has drawn unprecedented fundraising hauls, attracting both large and small donors.
Independent Expenditures
Candidates Opposed/Supported by Outside Groups and Party Committees
Candidate Entire Cycle Total Last Week Total Last 24 Hours Total Supported Opposed Obama, Barack (D) 
$393,258,399 $55,444,144 $1,554,682 $49,816,652 $333,851,814 Romney, Mitt (R) $186,408,055 $18,743,983 $2,693,919 $90,586,403 $95,275,499 Gingrich, Newt (R) $32,439,757 $0 $0 $13,597,555 $18,842,202 Santorum, Rick (R) $28,593,154 $0 $0 $7,646,898 $20,946,256 Paul, Ron (R) $4,247,914 $0 $0 $4,113,744 $134,170 Perry, Rick (R) $4,185,027 $0 $0 $4,162,689 $22,338 Huntsman, Jon (R) $2,804,895 $0 $0 $2,804,609 $286 Johnson, Gary (L) $555,204 $0 $0 $555,069 $135 Cain, Herman (R) $309,655 $0 $0 $307,802 $1,853 Stein, Jill (3) $4,507 $0 $0 $4,372 $135 Roemer, Buddy (I) $46 $0 $0 $46 $0 Total $652,806,613 $74,188,127 $4,248,601 $173,595,839 $469,074,688
www.opensecrets.org
www.opensecrets.org
And your supposed point, Mr. Lame Ass Rebuttal?
Wake up, white boy.At the outset of Donald Trump’s bid for the White House, he blasted super PACs on Twitter as “scams” and “unfair” and disavowed such outside help.
Then he changed his tune. By the end of his 2016 campaign, more than a hundred super PACs and similar groups had spent more than $72 million on his behalf, helping him defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton.
2016 Totals Raised:
Hillary: $769,879,088
The Donald: $468,846,867
Oh my, what "an extraordinary financial disadvantage"!
2020 Totals Raised so far:
Joe Biden: $98,266,045
Sanders: $181,211,792
Trump: $268,895,296
2012 Herman Cain: $16,227,060
If Republicans really wanted a black candidate in 2012 they sure had a funny way of showing it:
Independent Expenditures
Candidates Opposed/Supported by Outside Groups and Party Committees
Candidate Entire Cycle Total Last Week Total Last 24 Hours Total Supported Opposed Obama, Barack (D) $393,258,399 $55,444,144 $1,554,682 $49,816,652 $333,851,814 Romney, Mitt (R) $186,408,055 $18,743,983 $2,693,919 $90,586,403 $95,275,499 Gingrich, Newt (R) $32,439,757 $0 $0 $13,597,555 $18,842,202 Santorum, Rick (R) $28,593,154 $0 $0 $7,646,898 $20,946,256 Paul, Ron (R) $4,247,914 $0 $0 $4,113,744 $134,170 Perry, Rick (R) $4,185,027 $0 $0 $4,162,689 $22,338 Huntsman, Jon (R) $2,804,895 $0 $0 $2,804,609 $286 Johnson, Gary (L) $555,204 $0 $0 $555,069 $135 Cain, Herman (R) $309,655 $0 $0 $307,802 $1,853 Stein, Jill (3) $4,507 $0 $0 $4,372 $135 Roemer, Buddy (I) $46 $0 $0 $46 $0 Total $652,806,613 $74,188,127 $4,248,601 $173,595,839 $469,074,688
"free media attention valued at about $5 billion" - That's what made up the difference, dummy.Any republican, in the modern era, that doesn't know that the media is our enemy, is a fool.
You're a veritable fountain of stupid.
"free media attention valued at about $5 billion" - That's what made up the difference, dummy.Any republican, in the modern era, that doesn't know that the media is our enemy, is a fool.
