The Figures Are In: Obama Has Spent 3.2 Million Dollars To Keep His College Admissions Sealed

Steve_McGarrett

Gold Member
Jul 11, 2013
19,272
4,367
280
Incredible! I think we now know why?

Obama-Closeup-2.png



Double Standard Trump Rips News Media For Going After Walker s Records But Not Obama s - Birther Report
 
This claim has been debunked countless times, but the birther moles are too thickheaded and just keep coming back for more whacks on the head.
 
Whats the big deal? Why doesn't he release his college transcripts?? All the other presidents have.
 
Whats the big deal? Why doesn't he release his college transcripts?? All the other presidents have.

Claudette- you have claimed this before- and I asked you then- what makes you think that?

Here is a list of the last few Presidents- tell me which Presidents have voluntarily released(not illegally leaked) his own college records?

Bush 2
Clinton
Bush 1
Reagan
Carter

How about a link to Bush 1 college records?
 
Whats the big deal? Why doesn't he release his college transcripts?? All the other presidents have.

Claudette- you have claimed this before- and I asked you then- what makes you think that?

Here is a list of the last few Presidents- tell me which Presidents have voluntarily released(not illegally leaked) his own college records?

Bush 2
Clinton
Bush 1
Reagan
Carter

How about a link to Bush 1 college records?
I would argue that the Bush's had the benefit of nepotism and money to influence college acceptance.
But how many of those had the benefit of race quotas to supplant actual merit? The argument is totally legit and those who disregard that argument are dishonest partisans.
 
Incredible! I think we now know why?
rt

Is that the new figure Birthers have made up?

...
No Surannis, you Fogbow/RCRadio communist homosexual.

Then what is your source on 3.2 million dollars? And why would Obama have to spend a penny 'to keep college records from the public'......when the records aren't public already?

And lastly, has there every been a birther conspiracy you didn't immediately drop to your knees for and ravenously gobble down?
 
Whats the big deal? Why doesn't he release his college transcripts?? All the other presidents have.

No other president has. The closest a president came was Bush 2....when his Yale transcript was leaked illegally.
 
Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records


Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?


A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.




FULL QUESTION


Is this true?


Subj: What?


…and they want 12 years of Romney’s tax returns? THIS should be on billboards all over our nation!


Forward this to others who are interested in re-claiming America and saving our future


FULL ANSWER


This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.


But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.


Nothing ‘Sealed’


The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.


In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.


So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.





NOTHING IS "SEALED".


:dance:
 
Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records


Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?


A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.




FULL QUESTION


Is this true?


Subj: What?


…and they want 12 years of Romney’s tax returns? THIS should be on billboards all over our nation!


Forward this to others who are interested in re-claiming America and saving our future


FULL ANSWER


This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.


But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.


Nothing ‘Sealed’


The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.


In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.


So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.





NOTHING IS "SEALED".


:dance:
We need to see those college admissions. It's imperative.
 
Whats the big deal? Why doesn't he release his college transcripts?? All the other presidents have.

Claudette- you have claimed this before- and I asked you then- what makes you think that?

Here is a list of the last few Presidents- tell me which Presidents have voluntarily released(not illegally leaked) his own college records?

Bush 2
Clinton
Bush 1
Reagan
Carter

How about a link to Bush 1 college records?
I would argue that the Bush's had the benefit of nepotism and money to influence college acceptance.
But how many of those had the benefit of race quotas to supplant actual merit? The argument is totally legit and those who disregard that argument are dishonest partisans.

I would argue that anyone who makes that argument is not only a dishonest partisan but a racist.

Bush may or may not have benefited from being a legacy quota to supplant actual merit- but you never cared whether he did- or he didn't.

Only when you can use 'race quotas' as a code word to disguise your racism.
 
Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records


Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?


A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.




FULL QUESTION


Is this true?


Subj: What?


…and they want 12 years of Romney’s tax returns? THIS should be on billboards all over our nation!


Forward this to others who are interested in re-claiming America and saving our future


FULL ANSWER


This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.


But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.


Nothing ‘Sealed’


The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.


In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.


So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.





NOTHING IS "SEALED".


:dance:
We need to see those college admissions. It's imperative.


why?
 
Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records


Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?


A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.




FULL QUESTION


Is this true?


Subj: What?


…and they want 12 years of Romney’s tax returns? THIS should be on billboards all over our nation!


Forward this to others who are interested in re-claiming America and saving our future


FULL ANSWER


This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.


But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.


Nothing ‘Sealed’


The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.


In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.


So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.





NOTHING IS "SEALED".


:dance:
We need to see those college admissions. It's imperative.

Because Obama is black
 
Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records


Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?


A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.




FULL QUESTION


Is this true?


Subj: What?


…and they want 12 years of Romney’s tax returns? THIS should be on billboards all over our nation!


Forward this to others who are interested in re-claiming America and saving our future


FULL ANSWER


This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.


But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.


Nothing ‘Sealed’


The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.


In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.


So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.





NOTHING IS "SEALED".


:dance:


What are his grades then?
 
Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records


Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?


A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.




FULL QUESTION


Is this true?


Subj: What?


…and they want 12 years of Romney’s tax returns? THIS should be on billboards all over our nation!


Forward this to others who are interested in re-claiming America and saving our future


FULL ANSWER


This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.


But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.


Nothing ‘Sealed’


The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.


In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.


So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.





NOTHING IS "SEALED".


:dance:


What are his grades then?
Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records


Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?


A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.




FULL QUESTION


Is this true?


Subj: What?


…and they want 12 years of Romney’s tax returns? THIS should be on billboards all over our nation!


Forward this to others who are interested in re-claiming America and saving our future


FULL ANSWER


This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.


But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.


Nothing ‘Sealed’


The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.


In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.


So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.





NOTHING IS "SEALED".


:dance:


What are his grades then?


why?
 

Forum List

Back
Top