Should Republicans take control of the Senate next year Vice President Joe Biden should kill any serious move to impeach the president even though removal is justified. Impeaching Barack Taqiyya would be akin to removing Hitler so Stalin can move on up.
If the topic of impeaching the president interests you please begin by watching the following three videos:
These two non-Youtube videos are opening statements by Nicholas Rosenkrantz & Michael Cannon.
This excerpt is taken from an article discussing testimony before a House Judiciary Committee. There is a problem to be sure but it isn’t this:
Before the election in 2008 I pointed out that the media was determined to put a sitting senator in the White House. One of four senators was going to win; Barack Taqiyya, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, or John McCain. Beginning in late November 2008 I said the Administration would be a Senate Administration. I was right. Ergo, Harry Reid and Senate Democrats do not see any loss of Congress’ authority so long as the president is a Democrat implementing the Socialist agenda.
Bottom line: In the minds of Senate Democrats Taqiyya the Liar is carrying out the wishes of the legislative branch. Constitutionality matters little to the Senate with or without the House. Senate control only looks constitutional when Democrats have a majority in the House.
There is not much difference when Republicans control the Congress and the presidency. The government continues to grow, the country is betrayed to the United Nations with impunity, borders open wider, and the private sector standard of living plummets with each Administration.
A more accurate analysis of the growth of presidential powers show that presidents and the Senate have been doubled-teaming the House’s constitutional authority. Controlling the public purse is the primary objective for that nest of traitors in the US Senate. The Senate’s phenomenal success in controlling the country is easily measured in bailouts, and stimulus packages —— all agreed to by the House. One sentence sums it up. The country’s domestic and foreign policies represent the Senate’s political philosophy.
If you doubt that the Senate controls spending remember that Harry Reid tried writing revenue-raising bills years before this one:
Confirming an overt liar like Elena Kagan is proof that Senate Democrats have controlled the Judicial Branch for so long through the Advice & Consent Clause they no longer bother pretending that “America is a nation of laws.” Kagan was put on the court specifically to uphold HillaryCare II.
Taqiyya the Liar ignores the law, writes laws, while picking and choosing which part he will enforce. He does it because the Senate is his partner, and because he has nothing to fear from federal judges who lie. A majority of those judges are put on the bench for the sole purpose of carrying out the wishes of the US Senate no matter who the president happens to be. Indeed, Harry Reid changed a centuries-old Senate rule in order to confirm three more big government, International-minded, judges. Those judges will sit on the very court that will rule on the Pacific Legal Foundation’s challenge to the ACA.
Advice & Consent also included blocking confirmations; a technique Democrats mastered decades ago. Between denying confirmation, and confirming the “right” nominees, the evolution of Advice & Consent had more to do with neutering the House than did any single imperial president.
After FDR’s court-packing scheme failed, Democrats began confirming their activist judges in order to dictate domestic policy. The Senate version of packing the court was followed by confirming New World Order cabinet officers and bureaucrats. The most important evolutionary step took place after 9-11-2001 when the Senate overcame a longstanding obstacle. Global government traitors in the Senate finally gained control of America’s intelligence apparatus.
If the topic of impeaching the president interests you please begin by watching the following three videos:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KmKkNQyKyUU]Steve King Threatens Impeachment During Judiciary Hearing - YouTube[/ame]
These two non-Youtube videos are opening statements by Nicholas Rosenkrantz & Michael Cannon.
This excerpt is taken from an article discussing testimony before a House Judiciary Committee. There is a problem to be sure but it isn’t this:
Before the election in 2008 I pointed out that the media was determined to put a sitting senator in the White House. One of four senators was going to win; Barack Taqiyya, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, or John McCain. Beginning in late November 2008 I said the Administration would be a Senate Administration. I was right. Ergo, Harry Reid and Senate Democrats do not see any loss of Congress’ authority so long as the president is a Democrat implementing the Socialist agenda.
Bottom line: In the minds of Senate Democrats Taqiyya the Liar is carrying out the wishes of the legislative branch. Constitutionality matters little to the Senate with or without the House. Senate control only looks constitutional when Democrats have a majority in the House.
There is not much difference when Republicans control the Congress and the presidency. The government continues to grow, the country is betrayed to the United Nations with impunity, borders open wider, and the private sector standard of living plummets with each Administration.
A more accurate analysis of the growth of presidential powers show that presidents and the Senate have been doubled-teaming the House’s constitutional authority. Controlling the public purse is the primary objective for that nest of traitors in the US Senate. The Senate’s phenomenal success in controlling the country is easily measured in bailouts, and stimulus packages —— all agreed to by the House. One sentence sums it up. The country’s domestic and foreign policies represent the Senate’s political philosophy.
If you doubt that the Senate controls spending remember that Harry Reid tried writing revenue-raising bills years before this one:
Confirming an overt liar like Elena Kagan is proof that Senate Democrats have controlled the Judicial Branch for so long through the Advice & Consent Clause they no longer bother pretending that “America is a nation of laws.” Kagan was put on the court specifically to uphold HillaryCare II.
Taqiyya the Liar ignores the law, writes laws, while picking and choosing which part he will enforce. He does it because the Senate is his partner, and because he has nothing to fear from federal judges who lie. A majority of those judges are put on the bench for the sole purpose of carrying out the wishes of the US Senate no matter who the president happens to be. Indeed, Harry Reid changed a centuries-old Senate rule in order to confirm three more big government, International-minded, judges. Those judges will sit on the very court that will rule on the Pacific Legal Foundation’s challenge to the ACA.
Advice & Consent also included blocking confirmations; a technique Democrats mastered decades ago. Between denying confirmation, and confirming the “right” nominees, the evolution of Advice & Consent had more to do with neutering the House than did any single imperial president.
After FDR’s court-packing scheme failed, Democrats began confirming their activist judges in order to dictate domestic policy. The Senate version of packing the court was followed by confirming New World Order cabinet officers and bureaucrats. The most important evolutionary step took place after 9-11-2001 when the Senate overcame a longstanding obstacle. Global government traitors in the Senate finally gained control of America’s intelligence apparatus.
Last edited:
