Zone1 The Dick Act

[badbob85037]

You miss the point of why the Dick Act was passed, which effectively replaced state militias with the National Guard.

The "everyone just show up with your guns" model was impractical when everyone shows up with a different kind of gun, they have no structure or command, don't have the right equipment or uniforms, etc.

So with the need for militias effectively eliminated, there's really no need for the Second or Third Amendment, which were meant to regulate them and how they were used.

the Dick Act didn't create the National Guard. It defined the branches of the military. To be in compliance with this law biden and a lot of state governs who have destroyed an active part of the militia should be put on the gallows for treason as anything else would make the law worthless and spell a standing threat to the nation's defense. It also allows military laws to be used to anyone not showing up for muster or without the required equipment

 

[The Duke]

My Dick is clean ...

View attachment 751505

That Dick was a faggot.

 

[badbob85037]

You miss the point of why the Dick Act was passed, which effectively replaced state militias with the National Guard.

The "everyone just show up with your guns" model was impractical when everyone shows up with a different kind of gun, they have no structure or command, don't have the right equipment or uniforms, etc.

So with the need for militias effectively eliminated, there's really no need for the Second or Third Amendment, which were meant to regulate them and how they were used.

Read it again. Section 8, 9, and 10.

 

[The Duke]

You miss the point of why the Dick Act was passed, which effectively replaced state militias with the National Guard.

The "everyone just show up with your guns" model was impractical when everyone shows up with a different kind of gun, they have no structure or command, don't have the right equipment or uniforms, etc.

So with the need for militias effectively eliminated, there's really no need for the Second or Third Amendment, which were meant to regulate them and how they were used.

STFU you moron. If the people that wrote all that saw you trying to pervert it the way you're trying to do, they'd probably hang you immediately and then go have a few beers and some good whiskey and think "Damn, wtf was wrong with that asshole?"

 

[badbob85037]

You miss the point of why the Dick Act was passed, which effectively replaced state militias with the National Guard.

The "everyone just show up with your guns" model was impractical when everyone shows up with a different kind of gun, they have no structure or command, don't have the right equipment or uniforms, etc.

So with the need for militias effectively eliminated, there's really no need for the Second or Third Amendment, which were meant to regulate them and how they were used.

All you need to believe that is a dose of old joe. Show me one founder who spouted such crap. The law said not only will you show up with a military grade weapon but also the rounds to power it. Why don't you just read it ? It's in Englist.

 

[Woodznutz]

You miss the point of why the Dick Act was passed, which effectively replaced state militias with the National Guard.

The "everyone just show up with your guns" model was impractical when everyone shows up with a different kind of gun, they have no structure or command, don't have the right equipment or uniforms, etc.

So with the need for militias effectively eliminated, there's really no need for the Second or Third Amendment, which were meant to regulate them and how they were used.

If the reserve militia is called to defend the homeland, any weapon will be welcomed.

 

[Couchpotato]

You miss the point of why the Dick Act was passed, which effectively replaced state militias with the National Guard.

The "everyone just show up with your guns" model was impractical when everyone shows up with a different kind of gun, they have no structure or command, don't have the right equipment or uniforms, etc.

So with the need for militias effectively eliminated, there's really no need for the Second or Third Amendment, which were meant to regulate them and how they were used.

You can't override a Constitutional Amendment with a law.