The Democrat Party Has Always Been A Racist Party

[mudwhistle]

The Democrat Party has always been a racist party.....they're just portraying themselves differently with the help of a dishonest media.

Democrats have always supported racist policies. They supported slavery, invented Jim Crow laws, fought against Civil Rights legislation in the 60s, and came up with Affirmative-Action after they lost the fight to keep blacks under their thumb. They've simply changed tactics....but they've never changed their ideology that supports favoring one group over another because of race, religion, or sexual-orientation. Who you are matters more to Democrats than what you have done. Identity overrules character. But all of this is totally meaningless if you don't believe in their politics. Blacks aren't allowed to be conservatives or hold religious beliefs. You must go along with their fascist ideology (CRT, Cancel-Culture, MeToo, Diversity, Social-Justice, etc..) regardless of your race, religion, or sexual-orientation. But if you do go along....then your rights and privileges are secure. Only then.

The Democrats in the Era of Joe Crow

The Democratic Party has always been a racist party. Any interested person who has studied the internal workings of this duplicitous faction is aware of its racist history, its elitist framework, its systemic arrogance, hypocrisy, and intellect...

www.americanthinker.com

 

[EvMetro]

Democrats were the ones wearing the sheets and burning crosses in front of the homes of blacks and Republicans.

 

[mudwhistle]

Democrats were the ones wearing the sheets and burning crosses in front of the homes of blacks and Republicans.

They went from wearing white hoods to wearing black hoods.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Revisonism is fun when you don't have any facts on your side...

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Democrats were the ones wearing the sheets and burning crosses in front of the homes of blacks and Republicans.

Yea, they were pissed at blacks for having the right to vote...own property, all that communist stuff....

They were even saying that black folks having the same rights as they did meant they were losing their way of life.....

And don't even bring up the Confederacy...If you didn't look at the Confederacy as some noble cause; those Democrats would lose their shit.....

That is why when you bring up expanding voting rights protections or taking down Confederate monuments, Democrats get so triggered

 

[EvMetro]

Hi lefties....

 

[ChemEngineer]

Today, racist Democrats are shaming white people for our skin color. Despicable. Divisive. Ignorant.

Black Eye For America is Professor Carol Swain's best selling book which condemns Critical Race Theory, cultural Marxism.

 

[52ndStreet]

They voted down black rights as equals during the reconstruction period after the Civil war. I try to tell black people that the Democrats was the party of the KuKluxKlan. Many still are today. Biden is a closet racist.!Many Democrats are racist. The Democrats never wanted slaves to be free. They wanted slavery to continue.The Republicans and Lincoln decided that slavery was un American, and evil. The Democrats did not see it that way.

 

[Man of Ethics]

Sadly, now more Republicans are racist. That is a deal breaker for most African Americans, most Muslims, and most Jews.

 

[Colin norris]

Democrats were the ones wearing the sheets and burning crosses in front of the homes of blacks and Republicans.

Really?
You're off your meds.

 

[IM2]

They voted down black rights as equals during the reconstruction period after the Civil war. I try to tell black people that the Democrats was the party of the KuKluxKlan. Many still are today. Biden is a closet racist.!Many Democrats are racist. The Democrats never wanted slaves to be free. They wanted slavery to continue.The Republicans and Lincoln decided that slavery was un American, and evil. The Democrats did not see it that way.

"They voted down black rights as equals during the reconstruction period after the Civil war."

Compromise of 1877​

The Compromise of 1877 was an informal agreement between southern Democrats and allies of the Republican Rutherford Hayes to settle the result of the 1876 presidential election and marked the end of the Reconstruction era.

Immediately after the presidential election of 1876, it became clear that the outcome of the race hinged largely on disputed returns from Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina–the only three states in the South with Reconstruction-era Republican governments still in power. As a bipartisan congressional commission debated over the outcome early in 1877, allies of the Republican Party candidate Rutherford Hayes met in secret with moderate southern Democrats in order to negotiate acceptance of Hayes’ election. The Democrats agreed not to block Hayes’ victory on the condition that Republicans withdraw all federal troops from the South, thus consolidating Democratic control over the region. As a result of the so-called Compromise of 1877 (or Compromise of 1876), Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina became Democratic once again, effectively bringing an end to the Reconstruction era.

Compromise of 1877 - Definition, Results & Significance

The Compromise of 1877 was an agreement that resolved the disputed 1876 presidential election between Democratic candidate Samuel Tilden and Republican candidate Rutherford B. Hayes. As part of the compromise, Democrats agreed that Hayes would become president in exchange for the withdrawal of...

www.history.com

"The Democrats never wanted slaves to be free. They wanted slavery to continue.The Republicans and Lincoln decided that slavery was un American, and evil."

The republican party is the party of the Corwin Amendment.

The Corwin Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would shield "domestic institutions" of the states from the federal constitutional amendment process and from abolition or interference by Congress. Although the Corwin Amendment does not explicitly use the word slavery, it was designed specifically to protect slavery from federal power.

The proposed constitutional amendment declared:

No amendment of this Constitution, having for its object any interference within the States with the relations between their citizens and those described in second section of the first article of the Constitution as "all other persons", shall originate with any State that does not recognize that relation within its own limits, or shall be valid without the assent of every one of the States composing the Union.

On February 26, Congressman Thomas Corwin, who had chaired the earlier House committee, introduced his own text as a substitute, but it was not adopted. The following day, after a series of preliminary votes, the House voted 123 to 71 in favor of the original resolution, but as this was below the required two-thirds majority, the measure was not passed. On February 28, however, the House returned to and approved Corwin's version by a vote of 133 to 65, just barely above the two-thirds threshold.

This was Corwins versioon:

"No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State."

The Senate took up the proposed amendment on March 2, 1861, debating its merits without a recess through the pre-dawn hours on March 4. When the final vote was taken the amendment passed with exactly the needed two-thirds majority – 24-12.

Abraham Lincoln, in his first inaugural address on March 4, said of the Corwin Amendment:

I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service ... holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.

Just weeks prior to the outbreak of the Civil War, Lincoln sent a letter to each state's governor transmitting the proposed amendment, noting that Buchanan had approved it.

The Corwin Amendment has been ratified by:

Kentucky: April 4, 1861
Ohio: May 13, 1861 (rescinded ratification – March 31, 1864)
Rhode Island: May 31, 1861
Maryland: January 10, 1862 (rescinded ratification – April 7, 2014)
Illinois: June 2, 1863

On February 14, 1862, prior to the 1863 ratification of the amendment by the Illinois General Assembly, an Illinois state constitutional convention purported to ratify the Corwin Amendment. However, since Illinois state lawmakers were sitting as delegates to a convention at the time—and not meeting as the actual state legislature—that action was of questionable validity.

The Restored Government of Virginia, consisting mostly of representatives of what would become West Virginia, voted to approve the amendment on February 13, 1862. However, West Virginia did not ratify the amendment after it became a state in 1863.

In 1963, more than a century after the Corwin Amendment was submitted to the state legislatures by the Congress, a joint resolution to ratify it was introduced in the Texas House of Representatives by Dallas Republican Henry Stollenwerck

en.wikipedia.org
Corwin Amendment - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

It would have made slavery constitutional had it been ratified.

Unfortunately for you most black folks know this as I am black and showing it to you. You don't really know much about history.

 

[AZrailwhale]

"They voted down black rights as equals during the reconstruction period after the Civil war."

Compromise of 1877​

The Compromise of 1877 was an informal agreement between southern Democrats and allies of the Republican Rutherford Hayes to settle the result of the 1876 presidential election and marked the end of the Reconstruction era.

Immediately after the presidential election of 1876, it became clear that the outcome of the race hinged largely on disputed returns from Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina–the only three states in the South with Reconstruction-era Republican governments still in power. As a bipartisan congressional commission debated over the outcome early in 1877, allies of the Republican Party candidate Rutherford Hayes met in secret with moderate southern Democrats in order to negotiate acceptance of Hayes’ election. The Democrats agreed not to block Hayes’ victory on the condition that Republicans withdraw all federal troops from the South, thus consolidating Democratic control over the region. As a result of the so-called Compromise of 1877 (or Compromise of 1876), Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina became Democratic once again, effectively bringing an end to the Reconstruction era.

Compromise of 1877 - Definition, Results & Significance

The Compromise of 1877 was an agreement that resolved the disputed 1876 presidential election between Democratic candidate Samuel Tilden and Republican candidate Rutherford B. Hayes. As part of the compromise, Democrats agreed that Hayes would become president in exchange for the withdrawal of...

www.history.com

"The Democrats never wanted slaves to be free. They wanted slavery to continue.The Republicans and Lincoln decided that slavery was un American, and evil."

The republican party is the party of the Corwin Amendment.

The Corwin Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would shield "domestic institutions" of the states from the federal constitutional amendment process and from abolition or interference by Congress. Although the Corwin Amendment does not explicitly use the word slavery, it was designed specifically to protect slavery from federal power.

The proposed constitutional amendment declared:

No amendment of this Constitution, having for its object any interference within the States with the relations between their citizens and those described in second section of the first article of the Constitution as "all other persons", shall originate with any State that does not recognize that relation within its own limits, or shall be valid without the assent of every one of the States composing the Union.

On February 26, Congressman Thomas Corwin, who had chaired the earlier House committee, introduced his own text as a substitute, but it was not adopted. The following day, after a series of preliminary votes, the House voted 123 to 71 in favor of the original resolution, but as this was below the required two-thirds majority, the measure was not passed. On February 28, however, the House returned to and approved Corwin's version by a vote of 133 to 65, just barely above the two-thirds threshold.

This was Corwins versioon:

"No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State."

The Senate took up the proposed amendment on March 2, 1861, debating its merits without a recess through the pre-dawn hours on March 4. When the final vote was taken the amendment passed with exactly the needed two-thirds majority – 24-12.

Abraham Lincoln, in his first inaugural address on March 4, said of the Corwin Amendment:

I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service ... holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.

Just weeks prior to the outbreak of the Civil War, Lincoln sent a letter to each state's governor transmitting the proposed amendment, noting that Buchanan had approved it.

The Corwin Amendment has been ratified by:

Kentucky: April 4, 1861
Ohio: May 13, 1861 (rescinded ratification – March 31, 1864)
Rhode Island: May 31, 1861
Maryland: January 10, 1862 (rescinded ratification – April 7, 2014)
Illinois: June 2, 1863

On February 14, 1862, prior to the 1863 ratification of the amendment by the Illinois General Assembly, an Illinois state constitutional convention purported to ratify the Corwin Amendment. However, since Illinois state lawmakers were sitting as delegates to a convention at the time—and not meeting as the actual state legislature—that action was of questionable validity.

The Restored Government of Virginia, consisting mostly of representatives of what would become West Virginia, voted to approve the amendment on February 13, 1862. However, West Virginia did not ratify the amendment after it became a state in 1863.

In 1963, more than a century after the Corwin Amendment was submitted to the state legislatures by the Congress, a joint resolution to ratify it was introduced in the Texas House of Representatives by Dallas Republican Henry Stollenwerck

en.wikipedia.org
Corwin Amendment - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

It would have made slavery constitutional had it been ratified.

Unfortunately for you most black folks know this as I am black and showing it to you. You don't really know much about history.

Yes, the Corwin Amendment was a last ditch effort to preserve the Union and prevent a civil war that ultimately cost hundreds of thousand lives and maimed and made homeless millions of American citizens. Slavery was already dying, the deep south had over farmed it's land, slaves were constantly becoming more expensive and less competitive with mechanical farming. Left alone, I doubt there would have been a slave left in the USA by 1900. In pretty much every other slave holding country, slavery died out on it's own because it was a failed system economically. Slaves can't compete with free workers because they gain no benefit from their work.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Stop sending me notifications. Your dumbass leadership has driven me and others away with your sickening Leftist ideology and censorship.
Bro needs to be tazed, and very badly.