The crackpots and cultists of catastrophic climate change

Ringtone

Platinum Member
Sep 3, 2019
6,142
3,522
940
The hypocrisy, the insanity, the virtue-signaling, the lies, the fools, the hate, the viciousness. . . .

 
What does the Pentagon say on the matter? What did the fossil fuel industry's research begin revealing as early as the 1980s?
 
Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

"Opposing" (the AGW Consensus)

Since 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[29] NO national or international scientific body any longer rejects the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.[28][30]

Surveys of scientists and scientific literature

Various surveys have been conducted to evaluate scientific opinion on global warming. They have concluded that the majority of scientists support the idea of anthropogenic climate change.

In 2004, the geologist and historian of science Naomi Oreskes summarized a study of the scientific literature on climate change.[131] She analyzed 928 abstracts of papers from refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 and concluded that there is a scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change.

Oreskes divided the abstracts into six categories: explicit endorsement of the consensus position, evaluation of impacts, mitigation proposals, methods, paleoclimate analysis, and rejection of the consensus position. 75% of the abstracts were placed in the first three categories (either explicitly or implicitly accepting the consensus view); 25% dealt with methods or paleoclimate, thus taking no position on current anthropogenic climate change.

None of the abstracts disagreed with the consensus position, which the author found to be "remarkable".
According to the report, "authors evaluating impacts, developing methods, or studying paleoclimatic change might believe that current climate change is natural. However, none of these papers argued that point."....".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change


`​
 
What did the fossil fuel industry's research begin revealing as early as the 1980s?
That CO2 was a follower of temp change and that it can not drive anything...
Love to see it, thanks it advance, The Reality America Show won't last, the antidote will come and the planet will go right on evolving, it has no need for hominids whatsoever. Watch. You'll be shatting yourself over migrations the rest of your life.
 
Love to see it, thanks it advance, The Reality America Show won't last, the antidote will come and the planet will go right on evolving, it has no need for hominids whatsoever. Watch. You'll be shatting yourself over migrations the rest of your life.

Hatred of humanity. Death cult. Hysterical nonsense.
 
Love to see it, thanks it advance, The Reality America Show won't last, the antidote will come and the planet will go right on evolving, it has no need for hominids whatsoever. Watch. You'll be shatting yourself over migrations the rest of your life.

Hatred of humanity. Death cult. Hysterical nonsense.

Those who cage migrants in concentration camps are our salvation; no soap or toothpaste for the kids, I hear MS-13 recruits in utero.
 
Love to see it, thanks it advance, The Reality America Show won't last, the antidote will come and the planet will go right on evolving, it has no need for hominids whatsoever. Watch. You'll be shatting yourself over migrations the rest of your life.

Hatred of humanity. Death cult. Hysterical nonsense.

Those who cage migrants in concentration camps are our salvation; no soap or toothpaste for the kids, I hear MS-13 recruits in utero.

Lies.
 
Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

"Opposing" (the AGW Consensus)

Since 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[29] NO national or international scientific body any longer rejects the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.[28][30]

Surveys of scientists and scientific literature

Various surveys have been conducted to evaluate scientific opinion on global warming. They have concluded that the majority of scientists support the idea of anthropogenic climate change.

In 2004, the geologist and historian of science Naomi Oreskes summarized a study of the scientific literature on climate change.[131] She analyzed 928 abstracts of papers from refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 and concluded that there is a scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change.

Oreskes divided the abstracts into six categories: explicit endorsement of the consensus position, evaluation of impacts, mitigation proposals, methods, paleoclimate analysis, and rejection of the consensus position. 75% of the abstracts were placed in the first three categories (either explicitly or implicitly accepting the consensus view); 25% dealt with methods or paleoclimate, thus taking no position on current anthropogenic climate change.

None of the abstracts disagreed with the consensus position, which the author found to be "remarkable".
According to the report, "authors evaluating impacts, developing methods, or studying paleoclimatic change might believe that current climate change is natural. However, none of these papers argued that point."....".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change


`​
^^^
Wikidiot.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Man Made Climate Change is the biggest HOAX and SCAM of the modern era. A pure economic and social engineering scheme to redistribute Income and Wealth from the people that can least afford it, the middle income earner. Just another scheme for the Elite to further consolidate wealth and power.
 
Man Made Climate Change is the biggest HOAX and SCAM of the modern era. A pure economic and social engineering scheme to redistribute Income and Wealth from the people that can least afford it, the middle income earner. Just another scheme for the Elite to further consolidate wealth and power.

How does it rate against Islamophobia?
 
Man Made Climate Change is the biggest HOAX and SCAM of the modern era. A pure economic and social engineering scheme to redistribute Income and Wealth from the people that can least afford it, the middle income earner. Just another scheme for the Elite to further consolidate wealth and power.

How does it rate against Islamophobia?

Only that the Muslim world would love to see the United States destroy its economy and itself with the disaster of the Climate zealot's taxes, regulations, restrictions, and other destructive measures.
 
Man Made Climate Change is the biggest HOAX and SCAM of the modern era. A pure economic and social engineering scheme to redistribute Income and Wealth from the people that can least afford it, the middle income earner. Just another scheme for the Elite to further consolidate wealth and power.

How does it rate against Islamophobia?

Only that the Muslim world would love to see the United States destroy its economy and itself with the disaster of the Climate zealot's taxes, regulations, restrictions, and other destructive measures.

Ah ... so your claim that climate change is the biggest hoax is strictly based on your political ideology ... rather than any rational or objective thought ...

Why do you think Indonesians want the US to collapse? ... that's just such an odd thing to say ... Bangladesh has a very good relationship with not only the US but with our allies in the region ... I know there's a sub-sect (Jihadist) of a sub-sect (Wahhabism) of the smaller of the two main branches of Islam (Sunni), and those folks are pretty nasty ... seems unfair to hold a billion and a half honest hardworking folks responsible for the crimes of just a few thousand ...

That's just as bad as having a snowflake melt-down because a few thousand people will see a tiny bit more rain or the ocean shore a little closer ... the rest of the 8 billion of us won't notice any climate change for another 10,000 years ...

Vote your fears if you're made of money, I guess ...
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top