What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Conservative Case For Welfare

Gdjjr

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
11,072
Reaction score
6,100
Points
965
Location
Texas
Not to be outdone by the Democrats, Republican senator Mitt Romney has proposed the Family Security Act. It would “provide a monthly cash benefit for families, amounting to $350 a month for each young child, and $250 a month for each school-aged child.” It will supposedly cut “child poverty by up to one-third in America.” Parents would be eligible to apply to receive the benefit four months prior to a child’s due date. The maximum monthly payment available to parents would be $1,250 per family. This is accomplished by reducing the benefit by $50 for every $1,000 above the current CTC income phaseout thresholds of $200,000 for single-filers and $400,000 for joint-filers. The monthly payments would be administered by the Social Security Administration (SSA). The benefit would be “paid for” by consolidating “overlapping and often duplicative federal policies into direct support for families” and by eliminating the State and Local Tax Deduction (SALT).

:rolleyes: <<<<<<<<<MY OPINION

The Conservative Case for Welfare
 
OP
Gdjjr

Gdjjr

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
11,072
Reaction score
6,100
Points
965
Location
Texas
But wait! There's more- if you order now!

This is what the paternalists just don’t get. When you make a peaceful activity illegal, you get a black market that involve massive violence. Not just when then banned booze but also when they banned drugs. Where do the paternalists think all those drug cartels and booze gangs came from?


Do the do-gooders ever take personal responsibility for the deaths and suffering their paternalistic bans cause? Of course not. They exclaim, “Please judge us by our good intentions, not by the actual results of our paternalistic programs.”


I wonder how long the American people will put up with this paternalistic nonsense. When will people rise up and say, “Butt out of my life”? Even better, when will they rise up and demand a ban on paternalistic government?


Ban Paternalistic Government
 

justinacolmena

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
9,411
Reaction score
2,882
Points
210
Location
alaska, usa
This is what the paternalists just don’t get. When you make a peaceful activity illegal, you get a black market that involve massive violence. Not just when then banned booze but also when they banned drugs.
And you think registering, controlling, and banning guns is somehow more effective than banning drugs or controlling rotgut bootleg liquor?
 

WTH_Progs?

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
8,949
Reaction score
6,973
Points
1,940
Not to be outdone by the Democrats, Republican senator Mitt Romney has proposed the Family Security Act. It would “provide a monthly cash benefit for families, amounting to $350 a month for each young child, and $250 a month for each school-aged child.” It will supposedly cut “child poverty by up to one-third in America.” Parents would be eligible to apply to receive the benefit four months prior to a child’s due date. The maximum monthly payment available to parents would be $1,250 per family. This is accomplished by reducing the benefit by $50 for every $1,000 above the current CTC income phaseout thresholds of $200,000 for single-filers and $400,000 for joint-filers. The monthly payments would be administered by the Social Security Administration (SSA). The benefit would be “paid for” by consolidating “overlapping and often duplicative federal policies into direct support for families” and by eliminating the State and Local Tax Deduction (SALT).

:rolleyes: <<<<<<<<<MY OPINION

The Conservative Case for Welfare

FUCK YES, I can use that money for open drugs inside my Democrat run city. Crack's getting expensive.

Romney is a puke, he's Democrat through and through. Dude is twisted.
 

frigidweirdo

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
35,536
Reaction score
4,482
Points
1,130
Not to be outdone by the Democrats, Republican senator Mitt Romney has proposed the Family Security Act. It would “provide a monthly cash benefit for families, amounting to $350 a month for each young child, and $250 a month for each school-aged child.” It will supposedly cut “child poverty by up to one-third in America.” Parents would be eligible to apply to receive the benefit four months prior to a child’s due date. The maximum monthly payment available to parents would be $1,250 per family. This is accomplished by reducing the benefit by $50 for every $1,000 above the current CTC income phaseout thresholds of $200,000 for single-filers and $400,000 for joint-filers. The monthly payments would be administered by the Social Security Administration (SSA). The benefit would be “paid for” by consolidating “overlapping and often duplicative federal policies into direct support for families” and by eliminating the State and Local Tax Deduction (SALT).

:rolleyes: <<<<<<<<<MY OPINION

The Conservative Case for Welfare

Which will just lead to people having babies so they can get the money
 

skye

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
45,606
Reaction score
32,825
Points
3,635
Mitt Romney? LOL.....he is more demonRat than conservative, he is conservative only in name.

He is pure scum....didn't you know that OP? :dunno:
 

Tipsycatlover

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Messages
52,911
Reaction score
26,590
Points
2,645
Parents volunteered their children for this.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$85.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top