The Binder Blunder explained!!!!

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Romney got a binder full of potential female candidates because he wanted to hire some females while Barry unemployed about 3,000,000 females with his whacko policies. That's the binder blunder to the cancerous liberal MSM.

On a more subconscious level the cancerous liberal MSM wants you to feel that segregating women in a file shows prejudice, even when the idea is to combat prejudice or improve the quality of your work force by hiring women as the law requires.

The liberals know many will react to the insinuation of prejudice while ignore the idea of combating it by hiring women and ignore un employing 3,000,000. It is cynical and disgusting but so perfectly 100% liberal.

 

[Listening]

 

[grunt11b]

It's just amazing that the MSM is actually running with this stupid binder BS. They will ignore the fact that there is an 18% salary difference in Obamas white house between male and female staff, but Romney is this big evil rich guy for making a comment about a binder.

 

[beretta304]

It's just amazing that the MSM is actually running with this stupid binder BS. They will ignore the fact that there is an 18% salary difference in Obamas white house between male and female staff, but Romney is this big evil rich guy for making a comment about a binder.

And Obama is going to pay dearly for it. They think they are helping Obama...so let them think it.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

It's just amazing that the MSM is actually running with this stupid binder BS. They will ignore the fact that there is an 18% salary difference in Obamas white house between male and female staff, but Romney is this big evil rich guy for making a comment about a binder.

yes, as if male candidates are not put in a binder too!! Idiotic liberals apparently have specific requirments as to where files on candidates must be kept.

See why we are 100% positive liberals will be slow.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

It's just amazing that the MSM is actually running with this stupid binder BS. They will ignore the fact that there is an 18% salary difference in Obamas white house between male and female staff, but Romney is this big evil rich guy for making a comment about a binder.

And Obama is going to pay dearly for it. They think they are helping Obama...so let them think it.

Come to think of it, putting their files in a binder is a lot like putting them in a concentration camp!! Its so clear!!!

 

[RoadVirus]

It's just amazing that the MSM is actually running with this stupid binder BS.

Agreed. I see no controversy or whatever in it. As for the LSM, it's all they've got at this point. Romney's beating Obama and it makes them ill.

 

[Inthemiddle]

Romney got a binder full of potential female candidates because he wanted to hire some females while Barry unemployed about 3,000,000 females with his whacko policies. That's the binder blunder to the cancerous liberal MSM.

On a more subconscious level the cancerous liberal MSM wants you to feel that segregating women in a file shows prejudice, even when the idea is to combat prejudice or improve the quality of your work force by hiring women as the law requires.

The liberals know many will react to the insinuation of prejudice while ignore the idea of combating it by hiring women and ignore un employing 3,000,000. It is cynical and disgusting but so perfectly 100% liberal.

 

[OKTexas]

I want to know how Maobama does it, do they just truck in the women and sit them on his desk? I don't think Moochell would be too happy with that system. But then, ya never know.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

It's just amazing that the MSM is actually running with this stupid binder BS.

1) Yes, ABC news called it "the binder blunder"

2) Romney said he got the binders "from women's groups". Are women's groups anti-women????????????????????

 

[Nole]

the fact Romney has to play defense on this silly comment says its all.

I doubt anyone with a brain will allow this comment to change a vote. Romnyes sketchy stance on abortion is a different story.

 

[Listening]

 

[EriktheRed]

Here's another way to look at it:

It bears saying that if Mitt Romney became a governor in 2003 and didn't know any women who could take a position in his administration, then Mitt Romney has never given a damn about women he can't fuck.

The Rude Pundit

 

[EriktheRed]

So how did you like it, shit-talker?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

the fact Romney has to play defense on this silly comment says its all.

I doubt anyone with a brain will allow this comment to change a vote. Romnyes sketchy stance on abortion is a different story.

Barry's shameless prostitution on the blinder blunder issue will cost him huge credibility in the pro life and pro choice communities!!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Here's another way to look at it:

It bears saying that if Mitt Romney became a governor in 2003 and didn't know any women who could take a position in his administration, then Mitt Romney has never given a damn about women he can't fuck.

The Rude Pundit

makes sense, you hire who you happen to know rather the best in the world!!!

see why we are posoitive a liberal will be slow, so very very slow!!!

 

[Inthemiddle]

Romnyes sketchy stance on abortion is a different story.

Which one?

 

[Inthemiddle]

Romney's binders full of women is easy to explain:

He didn't build that.

 

[McDowell's]

Here's another way to look at it:

It bears saying that if Mitt Romney became a governor in 2003 and didn't know any women who could take a position in his administration, then Mitt Romney has never given a damn about women he can't fuck.

The Rude Pundit

Do you know enough highly qualified women to fill 42% of the slots the governor filled? Does your mere association with those women make them eminently more qualified than any other potential candidate? Is nepotism an integral component of your perception of efficient, ethical governance?

Granted, Romney runs in a more elite circle than you and should realistically know more women of substance. But incumbent in that is the fact those women are likely highly motivated and busily pursuing their on goals in other arenas. So why would you expect them to give up their own pursuits just because you whistle? You really are a masogynist prick.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Here's another way to look at it:

It bears saying that if Mitt Romney became a governor in 2003 and didn't know any women who could take a position in his administration, then Mitt Romney has never given a damn about women he can't fuck.

The Rude Pundit

Do you know enough highly qualified women to fill 42% of the slots the governor filled? Does your mere association with those women make them eminently more qualified than any other potential candidate? Is nepotism an integral component of your perception of efficient, ethical governance?

Granted, Romney runs in a more elite circle than you and should realistically know more women of substance. But incumbent in that is the fact those women are likely highly motivated and busily pursuing their on goals in other arenas. So why would you expect them to give up their own pursuits just because you whistle? You really are a masogynist prick.

and lets not forget Romney said, " we went to women's groups and got binders full of women."

Did womens' groups compile binders full or women because women's groups are anti woman as Barry would have us believe??