The Best Advice Ever...and Ignored: Benign Neglect

If the GOP was still the party of Eisenhower, I would likely have been a Republican.

Well, you've got Mitt!

I prefer Ben Sasse, but no objection to Mittens ;)
Figures you'd prefer a hard left limpdick like Ben Sissy or Mittens over REAL Conservatives. But then again you are a hard left loon, just like all other DemoTurds as there are zero Conservatives in that party.



Sen Sasse voting record says he is anything but a “left limpdick“.

The problem is that he is a conservative but not a Trump myrmidon.

If you think I’m a “hard left loon” , you have not been paying attention.

Care to try again? :)
Since you're a Communist Democrat, you are a hard Left loon. Guilt by association. And Ben Sissy IS a fucking RINO.

May want to check his record.

Keep pushing that “communist democrat” canard. The flailing is hilarious. :boohoo:
 
Last edited:


Sen Sasse voting record says he is anything but a “left limpdick“.

The problem is that he is a conservative but not a Trump myrmidon.

If you think I’m a “hard left loon” , you have not been paying attention.

Care to try again? :)

I mean he gets a 68 on the Conservative index.

And besides, he enthusiastically confirmed avowed Communist Xavier Becerra.

So he's a bit left of Mao - he's just what the GOP needs, according the Nazi democrats....

Did he now?

The vote was 50 to 49. Maine GOP Sen. Susan Collins joined Senate Democrats in favor of the nomination. Hawaii Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono did not vote.


Sure about that?

:oops8:
 
You: We need to make people jump through additional hoops to vote.

Me: No.

You: Why do you think blacks are too stupid to do this?

Bite me.



What does your post have to do with the OP?


Nothing.....it is simply one more attempt by a clueless Democrat....if that isn't redundant.....to assuage the pain the OP caused.

It hit home.

As do all of my posts.....and the best you can attempt is a change of subject.


Exactly the effect I aim for.
Oh the irony,kinda like how YOU change the subject when evidence is given to you that your hero Bush was as evil as Obama and they are the best of pals yet you have the warped logic that Obama was to blame for eveything yet Bush could do no wrong :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :rofl:
 
You: We need to make people jump through additional hoops to vote.

Me: No.

You: Why do you think blacks are too stupid to do this?

Bite me.



What does your post have to do with the OP?


Nothing.....it is simply one more attempt by a clueless Democrat....if that isn't redundant.....to assuage the pain the OP caused.

It hit home.

As do all of my posts.....and the best you can attempt is a change of subject.


Exactly the effect I aim for.
Oh the irony,kinda like how YOU change the subject when evidence is given to you that your hero Bush was as evil as Obama and they are the best of pals yet you have the warped logic that Obama was to blame for eveything yet Bush could do no wrong :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :rofl:

As far as actual policies goes, Bush and Obama were pretty much the same person.
 
I thought Democrats lie about everything?

Good for the OP to admit she was wrong...
The day the op ever admits to being wrong is the day I grow wings and can fly.she will never admit she has this fantasy that Reagan was the best Republican president of the 2oth century and own up to it thst he ran the most corrupt administration ever of any previous president at the time or thst her hero Bush jr was as much a mass murderer and constitution shit stainer as Obama was and that he was just continuing what bush got started. :uhoh3: :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
You: We need to make people jump through additional hoops to vote.

Me: No.

You: Why do you think blacks are too stupid to do this?

Bite me.



What does your post have to do with the OP?


Nothing.....it is simply one more attempt by a clueless Democrat....if that isn't redundant.....to assuage the pain the OP caused.

It hit home.

As do all of my posts.....and the best you can attempt is a change of subject.


Exactly the effect I aim for.
Oh the irony,kinda like how YOU change the subject when evidence is given to you that your hero Bush was as evil as Obama and they are the best of pals yet you have the warped logic that Obama was to blame for eveything yet Bush could do no wrong :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :rofl:

As far as actual policies goes, Bush and Obama were pretty much the same person.
:thankusmile:
You try telling that to pc,she plugs her ears and closes her eyes unable to accept that reality and does this everytime.:scared1::scared1::scared1::scared1::scared1:they are the best of pals,they are as much good friends with each other as much as I am with my best friend I hang out with.
 
If the GOP was still the party of Eisenhower, I would likely have been a Republican.

Well, you've got Mitt!

I prefer Ben Sasse, but no objection to Mittens ;)
Figures you'd prefer a hard left limpdick like Ben Sissy or Mittens over REAL Conservatives. But then again you are a hard left loon, just like all other DemoTurds as there are zero Conservatives in that party.



Sen Sasse voting record says he is anything but a “left limpdick“.

The problem is that he is a conservative but not a Trump myrmidon.

If you think I’m a “hard left loon” , you have not been paying attention.

Care to try again? :)
Since you're a Communist Democrat, you are a hard Left loon. Guilt by association. And Ben Sissy IS a fucking RINO.

May want to check his record.

Keep pushing that “communist democrat” canard. The flailing is hilarious. :boohoo:
You mean that he, along with all the other worthless RINOs, sided with the Dumbshitocrats 100% of the time?
 
If the GOP was still the party of Eisenhower, I would likely have been a Republican.

Well, you've got Mitt!

I prefer Ben Sasse, but no objection to Mittens ;)
Figures you'd prefer a hard left limpdick like Ben Sissy or Mittens over REAL Conservatives. But then again you are a hard left loon, just like all other DemoTurds as there are zero Conservatives in that party.



Sen Sasse voting record says he is anything but a “left limpdick“.

The problem is that he is a conservative but not a Trump myrmidon.

If you think I’m a “hard left loon” , you have not been paying attention.

Care to try again? :)
Since you're a Communist Democrat, you are a hard Left loon. Guilt by association. And Ben Sissy IS a fucking RINO.

May want to check his record.

Keep pushing that “communist democrat” canard. The flailing is hilarious. :boohoo:
You mean that he, along with all the other worthless RINOs, sided with the Dumbshitocrats 100% of the time?

Yet, the link I provided showed his votes lined up with Trump more than 80 percent of the time.

Care to explain how he voted with “dumboshitcrats” 100 percent of the time?
 
I thought Democrats lie about everything?

Good for the OP to admit she was wrong...
MODERN Democrats do lie about everything, just like you, faux "conservative".

Oh really. Let’s test that theory. What do I lie about?

I’ll wait....


Can we start with the fact that the OP clearly stated that the current Democrats are not the honorable sort represented by Moynihan?


You are as burned as Edgar Winter on an Ecuadorian beach!

So, Moynihan did not lie?

Thank you for proving my point.



The only point you have is hidden under that sombrero.



Keep trying to dig your way out of the post in which I caught you lying.

Oh, so Daniel Moynihan was lying. Try making up your mind.
All she is trying to say is Democrats hate this country. Their policies prove it.

She also says “Democrats lie about everything “.

Does that include her own OP about Daniel Moynihan?
 
I thought Democrats lie about everything?

Good for the OP to admit she was wrong...
MODERN Democrats do lie about everything, just like you, faux "conservative".

Oh really. Let’s test that theory. What do I lie about?

I’ll wait....


Can we start with the fact that the OP clearly stated that the current Democrats are not the honorable sort represented by Moynihan?


You are as burned as Edgar Winter on an Ecuadorian beach!

So, Moynihan did not lie?

Thank you for proving my point.



The only point you have is hidden under that sombrero.



Keep trying to dig your way out of the post in which I caught you lying.

Oh, so Daniel Moynihan was lying. Try making up your mind.
All she is trying to say is Democrats hate this country. Their policies prove it.

She also says “Democrats lie about everything “.

Does that include her own OP about Daniel Moynihan?


You must be a Democrat because you are lying again.

....even though I corrected you on this exact point earlier.

Hence.....a pathological liar.





From the OP:

" The two liberalisms also diverged in their view of America.

Moynihan’s older liberalism identified deeply with America
even as it acknowledged its failings. It respected facts and evidence.

... the new liberalism, the radicalism of the late sixties that captivated educated elites, was shot through with an irrational anti-Americanism. “Radical politics,” explained Michael Novak at the time, “is so much the province of the affluent . . . that it fairly reeks of class bias,” a bias against “middle America.”



Clearly, you are one of the lying low-life Democrats......self-identified.
 
I prefer Ben Sasse, but no objection to Mittens ;)

No doubt you "prefer" Bernie.

But Bennie ain't that far from him.



The Democrats are Bernie's party.


"MARXISTS AND EXTREME RADICALS SEEK TO TAKE OVER THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
  • DNC chairman Tom Perez said Democratic Socialists of America member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “represents the future of our party.”
  • DSA chapter chairs have agreed that “communism is good.”
  • One DSA caucus calls its members “revolutionary Marxists.”
A far-left group behind rising Democratic star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is rife with Marxists and other far-left radicals.
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which includes Ocasio-Cortez, is creeping its way into the mainstream of American politics.

What Perez didn’t mention is that the group behind “the future” of the Democratic Party is teeming with radicals openly dedicated to dismantling and overturning the economic and social foundations of the United States."
Marxists And Extreme Radicals Seek To Take Over The Democratic Party
 
We as a people are used to getting "paid". It is not about weening off of it as much as freezing it. Pay what we must for what we got. And we do not have the courage for that due to accusations and destruction of people due to racism charges.
 
I thought Democrats lie about everything?

Good for the OP to admit she was wrong...
MODERN Democrats do lie about everything, just like you, faux "conservative".

Oh really. Let’s test that theory. What do I lie about?

I’ll wait....


Can we start with the fact that the OP clearly stated that the current Democrats are not the honorable sort represented by Moynihan?


You are as burned as Edgar Winter on an Ecuadorian beach!

So, Moynihan did not lie?

Thank you for proving my point.



The only point you have is hidden under that sombrero.



Keep trying to dig your way out of the post in which I caught you lying.

Oh, so Daniel Moynihan was lying. Try making up your mind.
All she is trying to say is Democrats hate this country. Their policies prove it.

She also says “Democrats lie about everything “.

Does that include her own OP about Daniel Moynihan?


You must be a Democrat because you are lying again.

....even though I corrected you on this exact point earlier.

Hence.....a pathological liar.





From the OP:

" The two liberalisms also diverged in their view of America.

Moynihan’s older liberalism identified deeply with America
even as it acknowledged its failings. It respected facts and evidence.

... the new liberalism, the radicalism of the late sixties that captivated educated elites, was shot through with an irrational anti-Americanism. “Radical politics,” explained Michael Novak at the time, “is so much the province of the affluent . . . that it fairly reeks of class bias,” a bias against “middle America.”



Clearly, you are one of the lying low-life Democrats......self-identified.

Was Daniel Moynihan the DEMOCRAT lying?

Yes or no.
 
You: We need to make people jump through additional hoops to vote.

Me: No.

You: Why do you think blacks are too stupid to do this?

Bite me.
You "jump through hoops " to buy a gun in democrat States, should be the same for votes

It should be the case in neither example.
"It should be the case in neither example."

I’m proud of you! Not only are you a fool, but you have the energy to let everyone know it!



Let's go over the proof that you are a fool:
If Democrats get no checks on who votes, every dead person and every illegal alien would vote ....as Obama told them to.

The result would be a one party....the Wehrmacht....er, Democrat Party....system, and it would end the second amendment.


Did I mention that you're a fool?
 
You: We need to make people jump through additional hoops to vote.

Me: No.

You: Why do you think blacks are too stupid to do this?

Bite me.



What does your post have to do with the OP?


Nothing.....it is simply one more attempt by a clueless Democrat....if that isn't redundant.....to assuage the pain the OP caused.

It hit home.

As do all of my posts.....and the best you can attempt is a change of subject.


Exactly the effect I aim for.
Oh the irony,kinda like how YOU change the subject when evidence is given to you that your hero Bush was as evil as Obama and they are the best of pals yet you have the warped logic that Obama was to blame for eveything yet Bush could do no wrong :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :rofl:

As far as actual policies goes, Bush and Obama were pretty much the same person.


Really, fool?

Did Bush tell illegal aliens to go and vote?


Did Bush say this?
President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”
Obama Downplays Difference Between Capitalism, Communism [VIDEO]



Have I mentioned that you are a fool???
 
I thought Democrats lie about everything?

Good for the OP to admit she was wrong...
MODERN Democrats do lie about everything, just like you, faux "conservative".

Oh really. Let’s test that theory. What do I lie about?

I’ll wait....


Can we start with the fact that the OP clearly stated that the current Democrats are not the honorable sort represented by Moynihan?


You are as burned as Edgar Winter on an Ecuadorian beach!

So, Moynihan did not lie?

Thank you for proving my point.



The only point you have is hidden under that sombrero.



Keep trying to dig your way out of the post in which I caught you lying.

Oh, so Daniel Moynihan was lying. Try making up your mind.
All she is trying to say is Democrats hate this country. Their policies prove it.

She also says “Democrats lie about everything “.

Does that include her own OP about Daniel Moynihan?


You must be a Democrat because you are lying again.

....even though I corrected you on this exact point earlier.

Hence.....a pathological liar.





From the OP:

" The two liberalisms also diverged in their view of America.

Moynihan’s older liberalism identified deeply with America
even as it acknowledged its failings. It respected facts and evidence.

... the new liberalism, the radicalism of the late sixties that captivated educated elites, was shot through with an irrational anti-Americanism. “Radical politics,” explained Michael Novak at the time, “is so much the province of the affluent . . . that it fairly reeks of class bias,” a bias against “middle America.”



Clearly, you are one of the lying low-life Democrats......self-identified.

Was Daniel Moynihan the DEMOCRAT lying?

Yes or no.


I don't mind proving you a lying low-life Democrat.




From the OP:

" The two liberalisms also diverged in their view of America.

Moynihan’s older liberalism identified deeply with America
even as it acknowledged its failings. It respected facts and evidence.

... the new liberalism, the radicalism of the late sixties that captivated educated elites, was shot through with an irrational anti-Americanism. “Radical politics,” explained Michael Novak at the time, “is so much the province of the affluent . . . that it fairly reeks of class bias,” a bias against “middle America.”



Clearly, you are one of the lying low-life Democrats......self-identified.
 
I thought Democrats lie about everything?

Good for the OP to admit she was wrong...
MODERN Democrats do lie about everything, just like you, faux "conservative".

Oh really. Let’s test that theory. What do I lie about?

I’ll wait....


Can we start with the fact that the OP clearly stated that the current Democrats are not the honorable sort represented by Moynihan?


You are as burned as Edgar Winter on an Ecuadorian beach!

So, Moynihan did not lie?

Thank you for proving my point.



The only point you have is hidden under that sombrero.



Keep trying to dig your way out of the post in which I caught you lying.

Oh, so Daniel Moynihan was lying. Try making up your mind.
All she is trying to say is Democrats hate this country. Their policies prove it.

She also says “Democrats lie about everything “.

Does that include her own OP about Daniel Moynihan?


You must be a Democrat because you are lying again.

....even though I corrected you on this exact point earlier.

Hence.....a pathological liar.





From the OP:

" The two liberalisms also diverged in their view of America.

Moynihan’s older liberalism identified deeply with America
even as it acknowledged its failings. It respected facts and evidence.

... the new liberalism, the radicalism of the late sixties that captivated educated elites, was shot through with an irrational anti-Americanism. “Radical politics,” explained Michael Novak at the time, “is so much the province of the affluent . . . that it fairly reeks of class bias,” a bias against “middle America.”



Clearly, you are one of the lying low-life Democrats......self-identified.

Was Daniel Moynihan the DEMOCRAT lying?

Yes or no.


I don't mind proving you a lying low-life Democrat.




From the OP:

" The two liberalisms also diverged in their view of America.

Moynihan’s older liberalism identified deeply with America
even as it acknowledged its failings. It respected facts and evidence.

... the new liberalism, the radicalism of the late sixties that captivated educated elites, was shot through with an irrational anti-Americanism. “Radical politics,” explained Michael Novak at the time, “is so much the province of the affluent . . . that it fairly reeks of class bias,” a bias against “middle America.”



Clearly, you are one of the lying low-life Democrats......self-identified.

So Moynihan was NOT lying proving that “Democrats do not lie about everything“

I accept your concession.

Have a nice day. :)
 
I thought Democrats lie about everything?

Good for the OP to admit she was wrong...
MODERN Democrats do lie about everything, just like you, faux "conservative".

Oh really. Let’s test that theory. What do I lie about?

I’ll wait....


Can we start with the fact that the OP clearly stated that the current Democrats are not the honorable sort represented by Moynihan?


You are as burned as Edgar Winter on an Ecuadorian beach!

So, Moynihan did not lie?

Thank you for proving my point.



The only point you have is hidden under that sombrero.



Keep trying to dig your way out of the post in which I caught you lying.

Oh, so Daniel Moynihan was lying. Try making up your mind.
All she is trying to say is Democrats hate this country. Their policies prove it.

She also says “Democrats lie about everything “.

Does that include her own OP about Daniel Moynihan?


You must be a Democrat because you are lying again.

....even though I corrected you on this exact point earlier.

Hence.....a pathological liar.





From the OP:

" The two liberalisms also diverged in their view of America.

Moynihan’s older liberalism identified deeply with America
even as it acknowledged its failings. It respected facts and evidence.

... the new liberalism, the radicalism of the late sixties that captivated educated elites, was shot through with an irrational anti-Americanism. “Radical politics,” explained Michael Novak at the time, “is so much the province of the affluent . . . that it fairly reeks of class bias,” a bias against “middle America.”



Clearly, you are one of the lying low-life Democrats......self-identified.

Was Daniel Moynihan the DEMOCRAT lying?

Yes or no.


I don't mind proving you a lying low-life Democrat.




From the OP:

" The two liberalisms also diverged in their view of America.

Moynihan’s older liberalism identified deeply with America
even as it acknowledged its failings. It respected facts and evidence.

... the new liberalism, the radicalism of the late sixties that captivated educated elites, was shot through with an irrational anti-Americanism. “Radical politics,” explained Michael Novak at the time, “is so much the province of the affluent . . . that it fairly reeks of class bias,” a bias against “middle America.”



Clearly, you are one of the lying low-life Democrats......self-identified.

So Moynihan was NOT lying proving that “Democrats do not lie about everything“

I accept your concession.

Have a nice day. :)



Time for your quiz to see if you are capable of either learning, or telling the truth:
No erasing, no crossing out.




According to Moynihan.....and moi.......


....how many versions of Liberalism are there?




The clock has been started.
 

Forum List

Back
Top