The Arizona "audit" fiasco

Astrostar

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2017
2,938
3,841
1,940

Paid for by Trump supporters, managed and run by incompetents. Looks like the ninjas have nothing to show for their months and months of bungling. Even some Republicans are making a mad dash away.

But, we all knew in the first place that it was just to pacify the loser Trump.
 
That the number of ballots doesn't even come close to the vote total reported doesn't mean the audit was "botched"...It means that there's some big time fraud going on by those who supplied them to be inspected.
Right, we just need one more audit to find the obvious fraud that no one seems able to find. Just wait until the next one.
 

Paid for by Trump supporters, managed and run by incompetents. Looks like the ninjas have nothing to show for their months and months of bungling. Even some Republicans are making a mad dash away.

But, we all knew in the first place that it was just to pacify the loser Trump.
THE AUDIT WAS RIGGED BY THE DEEP STATE SWAMP COMMIES I TELL YOU

I SAW IT ON THE INTERNET
 
Right, we just need one more audit to find the obvious fraud that no one seems able to find. Just wait until the next one.
Fewer ballots than total votes reported...But not a hint of fraud!

BTW, the ballot counting has finished, Corky...They're now proceeding with the recanvass.
 
I read the article and there is no explanation of 'botched' 'rocky start' 'broke rules' and which 'election experts' warned the work was 'dangerous to Democracy' or why.

Also it is interesting to note that the AP story references "The review's Twitter accounts'...WTF does Twitter have to do with the recount?

The AP article refers to an unnamed 'Republican senator' calling the process 'botched.' Absolutely no name, no info, why the senator would say that etc.

The AP article says that a 'lead auditor' (again no name) said his work was paid for by supporters of Trump. Well, golly gee, that is the way election oversight is traditionally conducted by the OPPOSITION!! It's for damn-sure Biden and his supporters aren't going to demand a recount!!!

The rest of the article is a regurgitation of Democrat talking points. The AP has lost all credibility. If it ever had any.
 
I read the article and there is no explanation of 'botched' 'rocky start' 'broke rules' and which 'election experts' warned the work was 'dangerous to Democracy' or why.

Also it is interesting to note that the AP story references "The review's Twitter accounts'...WTF does Twitter have to do with the recount?

The AP article refers to an unnamed 'Republican senator' calling the process 'botched.' Absolutely no name, no info, why the senator would say that etc.

The AP article says that a 'lead auditor' (again no name) said his work was paid for by supporters of Trump. Well, golly gee, that is the way election oversight is traditionally conducted by the OPPOSITION!! It's for damn-sure Biden and his supporters aren't going to demand a recount!!!

The rest of the article is a regurgitation of Democrat talking points. The AP has lost all credibility. If it ever had any.
I read the article and there is no explanation of 'botched' 'rocky start' 'broke rules' and which 'election experts' warned the work was 'dangerous to Democracy' or why.

Op-ed flimsily disguised as "news".
 
That the number of ballots doesn't even come close to the vote total reported doesn't mean the audit was "botched"...It means that there's some big time fraud going on by those who supplied them to be inspected.
You have any evidence to support your claim???
 
---Arizona Audit: 74,243 Mail-In Ballots Returned with ‘No Clear Record of Them Being Sent’---

 
---Arizona Audit: 74,243 Mail-In Ballots Returned with ‘No Clear Record of Them Being Sent’---

Again for the slow learners:

Fact check: Arizona early votes falsely cited as evidence of voter fraud
 
---Arizona Audit: 74,243 Mail-In Ballots Returned with ‘No Clear Record of Them Being Sent’---


That's Brietbart..
 
That the number of ballots doesn't even come close to the vote total reported doesn't mean the audit was "botched"...It means that there's some big time fraud going on by those who supplied them to be inspected.

Apparently you can do nothing but lie. There is no evidence the numbers are vastly different. There is no evidence of fraud.
 

Forum List

Back
Top