Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If R v. W is eliminated by Congress, they better pay every women who was denied abortion the cost to raise for the birth, for all medical care, and all other costs (school, recreation, food, clothing and other necessary items) until the child is 26 years of age.
Well, it seems three have proven they are not pro-life, they support all kinds of choices which harm children, adults and all species of life; if that is not true, they would have not thought these questions were funny.
Can you wuote the part that mandates that taxpayers provide all that other shit?
Everyone knows biology 101, except for the male idiot who thought that a woman's reproductive system could be examined if she swallowed a small camera.
Who thought that?
You are the one propagandizing for a cause, not I. My posts merely refute your hypocrisy.Those who insist that abortion is murder but don't go stop it are self admitted accomplices.
There is a lot of evil that happens in the world, some within my awareness, and much, much more outside of my awareness. Very, very, very little of it within my ability to do anything about it other than to call attention to it, condemn it, and wish for it to stop.
Your statement that failing to stop things that are outside of my ability to do so makes me an accomplice, is pure nonsense, at best. Just another pathetic excuse, from someone who openly and knowingly and willfully supports and promotes evil, to point the finger of blame at someone else.
Some goofball in the state legislature somewhere like Missouri. I can't remember.Who thought that?Everyone knows biology 101, except for the male idiot who thought that a woman's reproductive system could be examined if she swallowed a small camera.
You are the one propagandizing for a cause, not I. My posts merely refute your hypocrisy.Those who insist that abortion is murder but don't go stop it are self admitted accomplices.
There is a lot of evil that happens in the world, some within my awareness, and much, much more outside of my awareness. Very, very, very little of it within my ability to do anything about it other than to call attention to it, condemn it, and wish for it to stop.
Your statement that failing to stop things that are outside of my ability to do so makes me an accomplice, is pure nonsense, at best. Just another pathetic excuse, from someone who openly and knowingly and willfully supports and promotes evil, to point the finger of blame at someone else.
Stop paying taxes, for one.You are the one propagandizing for a cause, not I. My posts merely refute your hypocrisy.Those who insist that abortion is murder but don't go stop it are self admitted accomplices.
There is a lot of evil that happens in the world, some within my awareness, and much, much more outside of my awareness. Very, very, very little of it within my ability to do anything about it other than to call attention to it, condemn it, and wish for it to stop.
Your statement that failing to stop things that are outside of my ability to do so makes me an accomplice, is pure nonsense, at best. Just another pathetic excuse, from someone who openly and knowingly and willfully supports and promotes evil, to point the finger of blame at someone else.
Tell me, then, what do you think I can or should do to stop the savage, cold-blooded murder of thousands of innocent children every day.
Stop paying taxes, for one.Tell me, then, what do you think I can or should do to stop the savage, cold-blooded murder of thousands of innocent children every day.
Now, that does confront you with your dilemma.
Just be careful with your accusations and allegations. Educate where and when you can, pontificate at your risk.
Screw you. If you really gave a shit about abortion you would be supporting age appropriate curriculum in all public schools on human sexuality, including how to prevent pregnancy and how to prevent STD's.
You mean like the “…age appropriate curriculum in all public schools on human sexuality…” now being imposed by the homosexual/transsexual/pedophile movement, to groom children into being easy prey for child-molesting filth, and to groom society to be more accepting of such abuse?
Is anyone really now surprised to see one seriously evil agenda, that targets innocent children as victims, now being tied in this manner to another evil agenda, that also targets innocent children? The same evil pops up in different forms, and I hope most people are aware enough to recognize it from one form to another.
You're starting to sound like the rich man asking Jesus how to be perfect; you hear advice too hard for you to practice. That's talking the talk but not walking the walk.Stop paying taxes, for one.Tell me, then, what do you think I can or should do to stop the savage, cold-blooded murder of thousands of innocent children every day.
Now, that does confront you with your dilemma.
And how do you suppose I am to get away with not paying taxes, and even if I could, how is it that you claim that doing so would in any way reduce the number of innocent children being murdered before they even get the chance to be born? You're not even trying to make any sense, at this point, it seems.
Just be careful with your accusations and allegations. Educate where and when you can, pontificate at your risk.
In other words, exercise my rights under the First Amendment. Which I have been doing, to the greatest ability that I am able. Alas, condemning evil is of limited efficacy, up against those who are determined to do evil, and who have managed to get the law to be on their side.
You're not very bright, no one tells anyone to be a homosexual or any of the other forms of sexual orientation. The only children "targeted" are those who are uninformed as to the dangers which exist, also in age appropriate manner.
Stop echoing right wing bullshit and post rational and doable solutions to problems, don't exacerbate the issues.
You're starting to sound like the rich man asking Jesus how to be perfect; you hear advice too hard for you to practice. That's talking the talk but not walking the walk.
The verbiage you use is strong, but your acts are weak. If you don't want to act directly, how can you expect others to act directly on what you expect?
This is why abortion is in such an uncomfortable place in the social conscience. No intelligent human thinks abortion is the best way to handle our reproductive activities. But this was so repressed for so long that when the floodgates opened it was too much to moderate. You can see this same process manifest in any number of current debates; guns, health care, immigration. They are all full of a past that contrasts with today. Short story, abortion has become democratized by availability of human services. The education and assistance commensurate with this development did not happen. Poor women, who have the least education and other advantages the majority has, now 'choose' without the capacity to do so.
Just the way so many people vote!
Educate, provide means of birth control, discuss and persuade, if you want to reduce abortion.
You are not going to make it totally illegal.
This is a manual that is written to communicate factual information to women. It is not intended to promote somebody's political agenda.
I've never read that book, and don't claim to know anything of its content or the intent of its author. I cannot credibly and directly dispute your statement that “It is not intended to promote somebody's political agenda.”, but I have to take note than almost every time I ever see it mentioned, it is by someone who is citing it to promote a political agenda, often a murderous agenda promoting and defending the cold-blooded killing of the most innocent and defenseless of all human beings. I wonder if that's what the author intended.
Is someone going into maternity hospitals and slaughtering the infants there, because that's the only thing I can think of that meets the definition of "the cold-blooded killing of the most innocent and defenseless of all human beings". When the right lost the public relations battle on stripping women of their God given right of free will, they attempted to change the language of the abortion debate away from women's right to self-determination, to one of humanizing the unborn and bestowing on the fetus the rights of living, breathing human beings.
You only care about children in the womb. Once they can breathe on their own, you right wingers lose interest real fast.
Like most faux conservatives, he's unwilling to open his mind to reality.
If R v. W is eliminated by Congress, they better pay every women who was denied abortion the cost to raise for the birth, for all medical care, and all other costs (school, recreation, food, clothing and other necessary items) until the child is 26 years of age.
I can show you in the Constitution where the child is entitled to the equal protections of our laws that all the rest of us are.
Can you wuote the part that mandates that taxpayers provide all that other shit?
No?
I didn't think so.
You expect everyone else to carry your baggage for you. YOU somehow get to decide, in your not-so-infinite wisdom, that everybody else needs to follow your opinions, and then want to sling the burden on others. No, thank you.
The Constitution (not me) is the law of the land.
The Constitution (not me) says that all persons are entitled to the equal protections of our laws.
"All persons" is a fucking INCLUSIVE statement. (I didn't write it but it is)
If you have a problem with any of the above? I really don't give a fuck that you do.
Neither a zygote nor a fetus is a "person". A Person is defined as:
1. a man, woman, or child: 2. an individual.
So you failed in your own definition because a fetus, in utero, is by definition, not an individual.
Tell me, then, what do you think I can or should do to stop the savage, cold-blooded murder of thousands of innocent children every day.
/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-sltrib.s3.amazonaws.com/public/FH4JSLJZUJGX3C5YFDCVLC3NZY.jpg)
June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
They don't want to admit that they participate in a system that makes decisions all the time about life and death. They would like to be set apart so they can decide who is more guilty than they. As they are untruthful to themselves, they use untruth to attack dissent.This is a manual that is written to communicate factual information to women. It is not intended to promote somebody's political agenda.
I've never read that book, and don't claim to know anything of its content or the intent of its author. I cannot credibly and directly dispute your statement that “It is not intended to promote somebody's political agenda.”, but I have to take note than almost every time I ever see it mentioned, it is by someone who is citing it to promote a political agenda, often a murderous agenda promoting and defending the cold-blooded killing of the most innocent and defenseless of all human beings. I wonder if that's what the author intended.
Is someone going into maternity hospitals and slaughtering the infants there, because that's the only thing I can think of that meets the definition of "the cold-blooded killing of the most innocent and defenseless of all human beings". When the right lost the public relations battle on stripping women of their God given right of free will, they attempted to change the language of the abortion debate away from women's right to self-determination, to one of humanizing the unborn and bestowing on the fetus the rights of living, breathing human beings.
You only care about children in the womb. Once they can breathe on their own, you right wingers lose interest real fast.
They don't want to admit that they participate in a system that makes decisions all the time about life and death. They would like to be set apart so they can decide who is more guilty than they. As they are untruthful to themselves, they use untruth to attack dissent.
This gets us all nowhere but more divided and weakened.
