The 2nd Amendment is not really about owning a gun

[Correll]

It’s about defending the right to go into an elementary school with a large capacity AR15 and slaughter six year olds

Like this fraud gives a damn about children

Its not about the children
Its about YOUR right to buy the weapon of your choice to slaughter them

Wow, you have really devolved. I remember a time that, though you were wrong, you could make a valid point. Now, you just come across as an anus.

Come back when a legal gun owner actually does that, but until then stop trying to use your fearful fantasy to scare us.

i broke him. i made him realize that his dreamed of utopia, would/will actually be a racist third world hell, and he had a choice between changing sides or becoming a troll.

 

[Auld Phart]

The 2nd Amendment is not really about owning a gun.
It is about the most basic universal Human Right to self defense whether it is a fist, a stick or a gun People must have the Right to defend themselves.

It’s about defending the right to go into an elementary school with a large capacity AR15 and slaughter six year olds

Trolling, again.


discuss the topic

 

[eagle1462010]

The 2nd Amendment is not really about owning a gun.
It is about the most basic universal Human Right to self defense whether it is a fist, a stick or a gun People must have the Right to defend themselves.

It’s about defending the right to go into an elementary school with a large capacity AR15 and slaughter six year olds

Trolling, again.


discuss the topic

Nice sig line..........LMAO

 

[rightwinger]

The 2nd Amendment is not really about owning a gun.
It is about the most basic universal Human Right to self defense whether it is a fist, a stick or a gun People must have the Right to defend themselves.

It’s about defending the right to go into an elementary school with a large capacity AR15 and slaughter six year olds

Trolling, again.


discuss the topic

OK

I think the second amendment is good. It keeps us safe and protects us from Commies

Better?

 

[ReinyDays]

It was the Plantagenets who would use the English army, and tax the English Barons, to fight their own personal wars on the Continent ... as soon as a weak King came to the English throne, the English Barons jumped him and took control of the army ... now the King had to ask, and promise lands and estates to the English Barons to fight these wars ... over the next 500 years this power swung back and forth ... and with George III a strong King, this balance was swung to the Throne at the time of the American Revolution ...

The United States enshrined in our Constitution the Right of each State to have and maintain their own army, separate from any Federal army, permanently giving the authority over the military to "the Barons", or in our case the States ... this was one of several safe-guards installed to keep the President from engaging us in wars the States didn't agree with ... the President had to ask the States to send their armies to fight ... and references to this in the Civil War abound, we see military units named things like Georgia's 2nd Rifle Brigade, Minnesota's 4th Infantry, Army of Virginia ...

I find no fault with our Founding Fathers putting extra safe-guards to our liberties, even if today we know some to be unnecessary ... very few States have any military assets independent of the DoD ... Maryland is the only one I can think of off-hand ... obviously, the other safe-guards in our Constitution work fine and we don't need the inefficiencies of 50 independent armies to protect our liberties ... Congress has enough power to stop the President from abusing our military, as demonstrated by the recent House Reprimand issued to Obama for using US military assets in Libya on the 61st day of such activity ... Congress can act very quickly when they want to ...

The Federal Constitution does not explicitly give the individual the Right to own a gun ... most of us will find this explicit right in our State Constitutions, each of which was approved by Congress ... this means just resinding the 2nd Amendment doesn't do anything, where the Federal Constitution is silent, the State Constitution holds firm ... we would have to replace the 2nd Amendment with one that gives the Federal government the Right to regulate gun ownership, thus rendering the State Constitutional provisions unenforceable ...

I honestly believe that we will not get 38 States to give up what little power they have left ... the anti-gun rhetoric is just a diversion away from our real problems with too much violence in the flawed belief that taking away guns will end crime ... ha ha ha ... they believe Americans are too stupid to kill themselves without a gun ... ha ha ha ... Covid-19 has killed 5 times as many people in 6 months as guns kill in an entire year (including suicides) ...

Has anyone else noticed these mass shooters are exceptional poor marksmen? ... someone who's good can take out a half dozen coyotes with a varmint rifle, these bozos can't even cap a dozen drunk humans ... $100 at Walmart and we can get kill counts in the hundreds ...

 

[eagle1462010]

he Federal Constitution does not explicitly give the individual the Right to own a gun ... most of us will find this explicit right in our State Constitutions, each of which was approved by Congress ..

BS............Shall not be Infringed confuses you.......too bad.

 

[ReinyDays]

he Federal Constitution does not explicitly give the individual the Right to own a gun ... most of us will find this explicit right in our State Constitutions, each of which was approved by Congress ..

BS............Shall not be Infringed confuses you.......too bad.

Article I, Section 6, Michigan State Constitution:
"Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state."

I emphasized the word "explicit" so you'd take note of that qualification to my claim ... it's not a foreign word ...

 

[$ecular#eckler]

The 2nd Amendment is not really about owning a gun.It is about the most basic universal Human Right to self defense whether it is a fist, a stick or a gun People must have the Right to defend themselves.

It would have been worded that way, if that were what it was about. It is specific to the right to use weapons for defense of the state by volunteers. The right to self defense is defined by the states.

 

[badbob85037]

The 2nd Amendment is not really about owning a gun.
It is about the most basic universal Human Right to self defense whether it is a fist, a stick or a gun People must have the Right to defend themselves.

The Second Amendment is about owning a lot of guns and all that go with it. Wheel guns, semi automatic hand guns, bolt action rifles, Semi automatic rifles, shot guns, machine guns, B B guns, long range guns, even spud guns and when no more will fit in the safe you buy another safe. single stage press, rock crusher press and the Cadillac Dillion 650 progressive press. Ya got to have a Lee Auto Primmer and a Lyman universal case trimmer. You got to have a case cleaner, dies for every caliber you own and ones you are about to own. Because nothing beats trying to put a small piece of lead through the center of a target from 3 feet to out over a mile.

IT'S THE RIGHT THAT PROTECTS ALL OUR OTHER RIGHTS. That is why democrats want them . Everybody with an IQ greater than their hat size know a party that champions murdering the most innocent and helpless sure don't give a rat's ass if you are killed YA HEAR THAT BETO, YOU FUCK?!

 

[mudwhistle]

The 2nd Amendment is not really about owning a gun.
It is about the most basic universal Human Right to self defense whether it is a fist, a stick or a gun People must have the Right to defend themselves.

It’s about defending the right to go into an elementary school with a large capacity AR15 and slaughter six year olds

No....it's the right to go into a school and shoot some kid who's slaughtering his classmates.