That shining "god" Obama couldn't even with nearly a $1 trillion in shovel ready jobs do this!

[Harpy Eagle]

I do not think you are, you have proven time and time again that you are.

It's not my problem for your lack of comprehension

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Because you're a rightward who can't understand I I left no numbers out.

Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in.

Please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I do not think you are, you have proven time and time again that you are.

It's not my problem for your lack of comprehension

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

Not my position never was nor has it been.

The list was a list in question was a list of quarters over 3%, So please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

 

[bigrebnc1775]

that's funny you think I'm baffled or could it be your TDS not allowing you to comprehend?

I do not think you are, you have proven time and time again that you are.

It's not my problem for your lack of comprehension

we have full comprehension, you are the one that lacks even the most basic IQ to understand what a list labeled "quarters over 3%" would have on it.

no, you didn't comprehend what I posted.

Everyone comprehends what you posted, what nobody can understand is why you are confused by a list of less than 12 numbers.

From post 485
"Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in".

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It's not my problem for your lack of comprehension

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Because you're a rightward who can't understand I I left no numbers out.

Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in.

Please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

Not my position never was nor has it been.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Because you're a rightward who can't understand I I left no numbers out.

Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in.

Please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

Not my position never was nor has it been.

We are not talking about your position, we are talking about a list that has you confused. Can you please stick to the topic?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Because you're a rightward who can't understand I I left no numbers out.

Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in.

Please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

Not my position never was nor has it been.

We are not talking about your position, we are talking about a list that has you confused. Can you please stick to the topic?

I have no input on it other than don't cherry pick the data

 

[Faun]

I do not think you are, you have proven time and time again that you are.

It's not my problem for your lack of comprehension

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Because you're a rightward who can't understand I I left no numbers out.

Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in.

Now you're flat out lying. I left no numbers out.

A moron claimed...

Obama is the only U.S. President to never experience one quarter of economic growth at, or above 3%.

To which I proved wrong by posting...

Like I always say — if conservatives didn’t lie, they’d have nothing to post.

Quarters of 3% or higher during Obama’s terms...

2009Q4: 3.9
2010Q2: 3.9
2011Q4: 4.6
2013Q4: 4.0
2014Q2: 4.6
2014Q3: 5.2
2015Q1: 3.2
2013Q3: 3.1
2013Q4: 4.0
2014Q2: 4.6
2014Q3: 5.2
2015Q1: 3.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

Now while I did inadvertently duplicate some of the quarters, I left nothing out. As anyone with functioning synapses can plainly see.

Then along comes a rightard to claim I was wrong...
​

YOUR NUMBERS ARE SOMEWHAT WRONG
U.S.: real GDP growth by quarter 2011-2018 | Statista​

​

So what did I get wrong? You can't even say. ​

 

[Faun]

I do not think you are, you have proven time and time again that you are.

It's not my problem for your lack of comprehension

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

Not my position never was nor has it been.

Then your position is a complete disconnect from what was being discussed, which was whether or not there were any quarters on Obama's watch that met or exceeded 3% real GDP growth.

Thanks for explaining to the forum that you're incapable of following a discussion.

 

[Faun]

I do not think you are, you have proven time and time again that you are.

It's not my problem for your lack of comprehension

we have full comprehension, you are the one that lacks even the most basic IQ to understand what a list labeled "quarters over 3%" would have on it.

no, you didn't comprehend what I posted.

Everyone comprehends what you posted, what nobody can understand is why you are confused by a list of less than 12 numbers.

From post 485
"Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in".

LOLOL

Bigidiot references post #485 .... in post #463.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It's not my problem for your lack of comprehension

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

Not my position never was nor has it been.

Then your position is a complete disconnect from what was being discussed, which was whether or not there were any quarters on Obama's watch that met or exceeded 3% real GDP growth.

Thanks for explaining to the forum that you're incapable of following a discussion.

It's not my problem for your lack of comprehension

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Because you're a rightward who can't understand I I left no numbers out.

Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in.

Now you're flat out lying. I left no numbers out.

A moron claimed...

Obama is the only U.S. President to never experience one quarter of economic growth at, or above 3%.

To which I proved wrong by posting...

Like I always say — if conservatives didn’t lie, they’d have nothing to post.

Quarters of 3% or higher during Obama’s terms...

2009Q4: 3.9
2010Q2: 3.9
2011Q4: 4.6
2013Q4: 4.0
2014Q2: 4.6
2014Q3: 5.2
2015Q1: 3.2
2013Q3: 3.1
2013Q4: 4.0
2014Q2: 4.6
2014Q3: 5.2
2015Q1: 3.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

Now while I did inadvertently duplicate some of the quarters, I left nothing out. As anyone with functioning synapses can plainly see.

Then along comes a rightard to claim I was wrong...
​

YOUR NUMBERS ARE SOMEWHAT WRONG
U.S.: real GDP growth by quarter 2011-2018 | Statista​

​

So what did I get wrong? You can't even say. ​

From post 485
"Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in".

 

[Faun]

Because you're a rightward who can't understand I I left no numbers out.

Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in.

Please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

Not my position never was nor has it been.

We are not talking about your position, we are talking about a list that has you confused. Can you please stick to the topic?

I have no input on it other than don't cherry pick the data

And your input turned out to be meaningless since you failed to prove me wrong.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It's not my problem for your lack of comprehension

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

Not my position never was nor has it been.

Then your position is a complete disconnect from what was being discussed, which was whether or not there were any quarters on Obama's watch that met or exceeded 3% real GDP growth.

Thanks for explaining to the forum that you're incapable of following a discussion.

From post 485
"Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in".

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Please list all the quarters than were over 3% that he left out...

Thanks

Not my position never was nor has it been.

Then your position is a complete disconnect from what was being discussed, which was whether or not there were any quarters on Obama's watch that met or exceeded 3% real GDP growth.

Thanks for explaining to the forum that you're incapable of following a discussion.

LOLOL

Spits the idiot who said my list of quarters with 3% or higher growth was wrong but then couldn't actually prove my list was wrong.

OMG I said you were wrong you left out some numbers.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?

Because you're a rightward who can't understand I I left no numbers out.

Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in.

Now you're flat out lying. I left no numbers out.

A moron claimed...

Obama is the only U.S. President to never experience one quarter of economic growth at, or above 3%.

To which I proved wrong by posting...

Like I always say — if conservatives didn’t lie, they’d have nothing to post.

Quarters of 3% or higher during Obama’s terms...

2009Q4: 3.9
2010Q2: 3.9
2011Q4: 4.6
2013Q4: 4.0
2014Q2: 4.6
2014Q3: 5.2
2015Q1: 3.2
2013Q3: 3.1
2013Q4: 4.0
2014Q2: 4.6
2014Q3: 5.2
2015Q1: 3.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

Now while I did inadvertently duplicate some of the quarters, I left nothing out. As anyone with functioning synapses can plainly see.

Then along comes a rightard to claim I was wrong...
​

YOUR NUMBERS ARE SOMEWHAT WRONG
U.S.: real GDP growth by quarter 2011-2018 | Statista​

​

So what did I get wrong? You can't even say. ​

From post 485
"Yes, I know you left out numbers that's why I add them back in".

And you're an idiot since I proved conclusively that I left no numbers out.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

yes I added what you cherrypicked

 

[Faun]

yes I added what you cherrypicked

I cherry picked nothing. I responded with the list of 3% or greater quarters in response to an idiot who actually claimed there were none while Obama was president. I then produced the entire list of quarters with 3% or more real GDP during his terms.

You're lying when you falsely claim I left any numbers off that list.