- Dec 17, 2009
- 19,377
- 3,398
- 183
A person who does not understand the responsibility of gun ownership shot and killed a man and wounded his wife for no good reason. Isn't it society's responsibility to make sure that someone with the mental and emotional capacity to do such a thing cannot get a gun?Obviously the carrying a Glock part was a tragic mistake!
Glocks work as intended.
With no manual safety they are very fast into action.
I'm not indicting guns. Don't defend them as if I were. I'm saying that we have a larger responsibility to public health and safety. The deranged should never have access to deadly weapons. Weapons that make such a tragedy possible. In the blink of an eye someone snapped and killed because he had the means to do so. Making guns more accessible will only insure more shameful killings will happen. Is there no sense of responsibility among the gun lovers who wear blinders to the sad effects of guns?
And the Easter Bunny is real.
You cannot predict mental status. Mental state is in the present or the past, not the future. There is no guarantee that a person, any person, will not kill or harm self or others. You want something that does not exist and cannot be done.
Last edited: