Thank God for our RIGHT to keep and bear arms

[P@triot]

The perpetrator was armed with a knife. This woman would have been dead if not for her 2nd Amendment right. Of course, the left have been waging a disgusting war on women for decades so they wouldn't have cared. In fact, I suspect that's why they want to disarm everyone. More female victims for them. Demand men have access to women's locker rooms, showers, and rest rooms and then disarm them.

Woman leaves would-be attacker bloody and wounded

 

[jon_berzerk]

i take it he survived

 

[P@triot]

i take it he survived

I hope not but the story didn't really specify.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

The right to bear arms doens't go far enough in this country. The military is developing some pretty powerful weapons such as laser tanks. Why can't we have access to those things? What is the point of having the right to bear arms if the public's access to them is severely restricted?

 

[P@triot]

The right to bear arms doens't go far enough in this country. The military is developing some pretty powerful weapons such as laser tanks. Why can't we have access to those things? What is the point of having the right to bear arms if the public's access to them is severely restricted?

Exactly. Our founders didn't say the right to bear "muskets". Or the right to bear "handguns". They said the right to bear arms. There are no limits on the type of weapons we can have. Of it's ok for the government to have them, and the government answers to the people, then it's sure as hell of for the people to have them.

 

[there4eyeM]

Nukes!

 

[there4eyeM]

No need to thank 'God'. Humans are the source of vocabulary.

 

[P@triot]

Another perfect example of how the Constitution saves lives and liberal policy would cause deaths. This hatchet-wielding maniac would be fully compliant with law under liberals gun control utopia. But thankfully, the Constitution granted this person the right to protect himself and those around him.

Customer Steps Up to Stop a Hatchet-Wielding Masked Man From Wreaking Havoc at a 7-Eleven

 

[P@triot]

Yet another person who was able to save themselves and their family because the Constitution afforded them the right to do so.

Family of Four Awakened by Man Shattering Windows and Kicking at Their Front Door. So Dad Pulls Out His 9mm Handgun and Heads Toward the Trouble.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The 2nd Amendment isn't going anywhere you crazy paranoids.

 

[hangover]

God is positive energy....guns are negative energy that destroys....therefore you worship Satan.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The perpetrator was armed with a knife. This woman would have been dead if not for her 2nd Amendment right. Of course, the left have been waging a disgusting war on women for decades so they wouldn't have cared. In fact, I suspect that's why they want to disarm everyone. More female victims for them. Demand men have access to women's locker rooms, showers, and rest rooms and then disarm them.

Woman leaves would-be attacker bloody and wounded

This fails as a straw man fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy, and speculation fallacy.

Most on the right have been contriving and propagating disgusting lies for decades.

And given the fact that most on the right seek to compel women to give birth against their will through force of law, they’re in no position to accuse others of ‘waging a war’ on women.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The right to bear arms doens't go far enough in this country. The military is developing some pretty powerful weapons such as laser tanks. Why can't we have access to those things? What is the point of having the right to bear arms if the public's access to them is severely restricted?

Conservatives also have the right to exhibit their ignorance and stupidity, a right you exercise freely and often.

 

[P@triot]

The perpetrator was armed with a knife. This woman would have been dead if not for her 2nd Amendment right. Of course, the left have been waging a disgusting war on women for decades so they wouldn't have cared. In fact, I suspect that's why they want to disarm everyone. More female victims for them. Demand men have access to women's locker rooms, showers, and rest rooms and then disarm them.

Woman leaves would-be attacker bloody and wounded

This fails as a straw man fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy, and speculation fallacy.

Most on the right have been contriving and propagating disgusting lies for decades.

And given the fact that most on the right seek to compel women to give birth against their will through force of law, they’re in no position to accuse others of ‘waging a war’ on women.

How could anyone "compel women to give birth"?

If you don't want to give birth, don't get pregnant. A woman has a right to her own body. No question about it. But the baby is not her body. It's someone else's body and she has not right to vacuum the childs arms off or smash its skull in with a small hammer.

As usual, everything you said is disingenuous. And, as usual, you're all pissed off because the facts show you to be the fool that you are and you can't dispute them. So you nonsensically cry "stay man" without even attempting to back that up (because you can't).

 

[P@triot]

The right to bear arms doens't go far enough in this country. The military is developing some pretty powerful weapons such as laser tanks. Why can't we have access to those things? What is the point of having the right to bear arms if the public's access to them is severely restricted?

Conservatives also have the right to exhibit their ignorance and stupidity, a right you exercise freely and often.

Says the dumbest person on USMB who attempts to talk about the Constitution without ever having read it.

 

[Camp]

The 2nd Amendment isn't going anywhere you crazy paranoids.

They ignore or do not know the meaning of the term "well regulated Militia". I doubt they know the difference between "keep" and "bear".

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The right to bear arms doens't go far enough in this country. The military is developing some pretty powerful weapons such as laser tanks. Why can't we have access to those things? What is the point of having the right to bear arms if the public's access to them is severely restricted?

Exactly. Our founders didn't say the right to bear "muskets". Or the right to bear "handguns". They said the right to bear arms. There are no limits on the type of weapons we can have. Of it's ok for the government to have them, and the government answers to the people, then it's sure as hell of for the people to have them.

Wrong.

You and other rightwing nitwits whine about the Second Amendment yet are completely ignorant as to its meaning and case law:

“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

As a fact of settled and accepted law the Second Amendment right is not ‘absolute,’ the Constitution authorizes government to place reasonable restrictions on all manner of rights, including the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment.

Consequently, there are in fact limits on the type of weapons you may have.

And because of your ignorance and stupidity you and other rightwing morons reflect poorly on those of us who own firearms, enjoy the shooting sports, and seek to defend the Second Amendment right.

 

[PK1]

"Thank God for our RIGHT to keep and bear arms"

God/gods had nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment. Try the Constitution's "founding fathers".

If we were made to need guns in addition to arms, God would have provided Adam a gun.

If man creates lethal weapons, he & family will die with lethal weapons.
A civilized society does not need lethal weapons for its normal citizens.
.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Another perfect example of how the Constitution saves lives and liberal policy would cause deaths. This hatchet-wielding maniac would be fully compliant with law under liberals gun control utopia. But thankfully, the Constitution granted this person the right to protect himself and those around him.

Customer Steps Up to Stop a Hatchet-Wielding Masked Man From Wreaking Havoc at a 7-Eleven

Another perfect example of a statistics of small numbers fallacy from the right.

 

[P@triot]

God is positive energy....guns are negative energy that destroys....therefore you worship Satan.

Now that's a cute lie! Dumb. But cute.

Just curious - who granted you the power to deem guns as "negative energy"? I find them to be the third most power positive energy in the world. And so did someone a 1,000x's smart than you - Thomas Jefferson:

In 1785 Thomas Jefferson wrote to his fifteen-year-old nephew, Peter Carr, regarding what he considered the best form of exercise: "...I advise the gun. While this gives a moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprize, and independance to the mind. Games played with the ball and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks."

Firearms | Thomas Jefferson's Monticello