History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes. Thomas Jefferson
Today’s “good Christians” represent the kind of scum T.J. was talking about:
Good Christians must welcome into their country anyone fleeing persecution and violence, even if they come from terror-producing countries.
That was the sentiment expressed by more than 500 evangelical pastors and ministry leaders from across the U.S. in an open letter to President Trump and Vice President Pence earlier this month.
“These organizations present themselves as strictly humanitarian in nature – charitable, humanitarian, nonprofit, do-gooding operations,” he said. “What’s not to like about that? Well, when they come into your community and start explaining why accepting refugees is going to be such a good thing and good for your community, and when they’re quoted in the local newspapers, it’s never pointed out that these are the exact same organizations that are profiting from the resettlement of refugees.”
That was the sentiment expressed by more than 500 evangelical pastors and ministry leaders from across the U.S. in an open letter to President Trump and Vice President Pence earlier this month.
XXXXX
“These organizations present themselves as strictly humanitarian in nature – charitable, humanitarian, nonprofit, do-gooding operations,” he said. “What’s not to like about that? Well, when they come into your community and start explaining why accepting refugees is going to be such a good thing and good for your community, and when they’re quoted in the local newspapers, it’s never pointed out that these are the exact same organizations that are profiting from the resettlement of refugees.”
Hohmann, author of “Stealth Invasion: Muslim Conquest Through Immigration and the Resettlement Jihad,” explained the resettlement agencies get paid more than $2,000 for each refugee they resettle in the United States. The federal government also pays these agencies to collect travel loans from the refugees, and what’s more, the agencies receive federal grants to offer services to the refugees once they arrive in the United States.
NOTE: The XVI Amendment empowered today’s priests of every stripe. Had I written the income tax amendment it would read this way:
XVI AMENDMENT
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. Every government official who attempts to legislate charity, or preaches, or advocates, using the public purse to implement charity in any form shall be hanged by the neck until dead.
Executing the people who are importing Islam’s morality should not trouble any American since Muslim fanatics killing American Christian parasites is the best thing Muslims can do:
Not only do the resettlement agencies have a financial incentive to resettle as many refugees as possible, but they are not even allowed to share the gospel with the refugees they bring in. Hohmann said they must sign a contract agreeing not to proselytize.
U.S. pastors' push for refugees called 'height of absurdity'
Posted By Paul Bremmer On 02/27/2017 @ 8:20 pm
U.S. pastors’ push for refugees called ‘height of absurdity’
Posted By Paul Bremmer On 02/27/2017 @ 8:20 pm
U.S. pastors’ push for refugees called ‘height of absurdity’
The only excuse Christian moneygrubbers can possibly offer is that they believe Muslim butchers will learn to live in peace with non-Muslims, or Muslims will convert to Christianity over time. Happily, Christian freaks prohibited from proselytizing with tax dollars will end in Muslims killing Christians in this country just as they do in Muslim countries.
Frankly, Muslims killing American Christians is not a bad thing since they brought it on themselves in this country.
Incidentally, regardless of what religious parasites do to each other the rest of us better adopt this political posture before it is too late:
Organized religions have been fighting each other for millenniums. Americans must defeat Islam as a matter of self-defense, but they must not do it for Christianity, Communism/Socialism, democracy, and certainly not for global government.
As I’ve said many times, I have no objection to killing priesthoods who want to kill me, but it makes no sense for a free people to surrender their freedoms by replacing one religion with another, and that includes Socialism-cum-global-government.
As I’ve said many times, I have no objection to killing priesthoods who want to kill me, but it makes no sense for a free people to surrender their freedoms by replacing one religion with another, and that includes Socialism-cum-global-government.
Muslims Made Occupation Obsolete
Forcing Americans to take in Muslim refugees prove that Christian do-gooders despise the Bible’s Good Samaritan. Jesus preached individual responsibility. “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” In short: Good Christians despise Jesus Christ because he never preached institutional charity —— the kind that priesthoods feast on. Ignore everything else and you will see that individuals opposing religious institutions will always activate those conflicts that separates God from organized religion.
The worst part of Good Samaritan laws is that they codify coerced charity.
Passing Good Samaritans laws on any level offers the best route to turning America into the country Taqiyya the Liar envisions. Democrats only want Good Samaritan laws because they give the government the authority to tell Americans how they must behave, in addition to further enriching the wealthiest members of the parasite class. (The rich always get richer when taxes go up.)
Let’s look at the punishment aspect of Good Samaritan laws.
Socialists always wanted to punish inactivity with lawsuits. As in all things Socialists move forward incrementally. The ACA moved into criminal law; i.e., the government punishes you for not buying insurance. Strip away all of the doublespeak and you are left with this fact: Every law that punishes inactivity is criminal law. The joke is that there is no day in court for those who are punished for NOT buying insurance.
Ultimately, Good Samaritan laws without criminal or civil penalties have no teeth. Indeed, there’s never been a priest who didn’t dream about punishing law-abiding citizens who refused to do as they are told. American judges do it all of the time. The Socialist priesthood is very close to making that dream all-inclusive for bureaucrats as well as for judges.
Those who think Good Samaritan laws are necessary should get their sermons in the church of their choice. In that way they can VOLUNTARILY submit to any punishment their “spiritual leader” metes out. Do not force me to come along.
Basically, Socialists/Communists are using “you have a duty to help” as an engine to change the meaning of law itself. You can see more proof of the Socialist/Communist agenda in so-called hate crime laws.
NOTE: The most vile brutal criminals are never punished by Good Samaritan laws.
Trying to blend voluntary and involuntary charity does not standup to scrutiny any more than it worked blending Socialism and capitalism. Good Samaritan laws order involuntary behavior pure and simple. Every other interpretation amounts to verbal calisthenics.
Just to be clear. So long as the choice remains mine I do not have a problem with helping people.
There is no better way to acquire the power of life and death over everyone than disguising a duty to help. Socialists in Congress are succeeding because most people are afraid they will look cruel and uncaring if they resist “helping parasites for the common good.” Result: Individual liberties are slowly being smothered to death by a false duty to help.
An amendment to the Constitution prohibiting the government from forcing Americans to buy anything should be considered no matter what the Court and Congress do with the ACA or open-borders. A clearly written, comprehensive, amendment will block the next attempt Socialists are sure to try. I’ll wager that they are already working on their next move without making the mistakes they made to date.
Let me close with a brief clip from the final episode of the Jerry Seinfeld show which was actually titled The Good Samaritan? To me, that show used humor to promote coerced charity:
XXXXX
Let’s look at the punishment aspect of Good Samaritan laws.
Socialists always wanted to punish inactivity with lawsuits. As in all things Socialists move forward incrementally. The ACA moved into criminal law; i.e., the government punishes you for not buying insurance. Strip away all of the doublespeak and you are left with this fact: Every law that punishes inactivity is criminal law. The joke is that there is no day in court for those who are punished for NOT buying insurance.
Ultimately, Good Samaritan laws without criminal or civil penalties have no teeth. Indeed, there’s never been a priest who didn’t dream about punishing law-abiding citizens who refused to do as they are told. American judges do it all of the time. The Socialist priesthood is very close to making that dream all-inclusive for bureaucrats as well as for judges.
Those who think Good Samaritan laws are necessary should get their sermons in the church of their choice. In that way they can VOLUNTARILY submit to any punishment their “spiritual leader” metes out. Do not force me to come along.
Basically, Socialists/Communists are using “you have a duty to help” as an engine to change the meaning of law itself. You can see more proof of the Socialist/Communist agenda in so-called hate crime laws.
NOTE: The most vile brutal criminals are never punished by Good Samaritan laws.
Trying to blend voluntary and involuntary charity does not standup to scrutiny any more than it worked blending Socialism and capitalism. Good Samaritan laws order involuntary behavior pure and simple. Every other interpretation amounts to verbal calisthenics.
Just to be clear. So long as the choice remains mine I do not have a problem with helping people.
There is no better way to acquire the power of life and death over everyone than disguising a duty to help. Socialists in Congress are succeeding because most people are afraid they will look cruel and uncaring if they resist “helping parasites for the common good.” Result: Individual liberties are slowly being smothered to death by a false duty to help.
An amendment to the Constitution prohibiting the government from forcing Americans to buy anything should be considered no matter what the Court and Congress do with the ACA or open-borders. A clearly written, comprehensive, amendment will block the next attempt Socialists are sure to try. I’ll wager that they are already working on their next move without making the mistakes they made to date.
Let me close with a brief clip from the final episode of the Jerry Seinfeld show which was actually titled The Good Samaritan? To me, that show used humor to promote coerced charity:
Where The Hell Is My Hub?
p.s. No average American admired William F. Buckley, Jr. more than I; so maybe someone with more knowledge can correct me if I am mistaken. As far as I know, Buckley’s conservatism never embraced the public purse for his church nor any other:
February 27, 2017 4:00 AM
Nine years after Bill Buckley’s death, reflecting on his Catholic life
WFB’s Faith
Nine years after Bill Buckley’s death, reflecting on his Catholic life
WFB’s Faith
