SweetSue92 Is Now Officially On the Mod Squad

Hell I dont have time, or the desire to apply
1780798878460.webp
 
Thank you so much, this means a lot. Some here are saying I must be a schoolmarm, since I retired a few months ago from a 32 year teaching career. But a lot of teaching is appreciating different people, reading the room, keeping the main thing in mind, and only disrupting with 'management' when it's really needed. I hope it will carry over....
Congratulations, you will make a great mod

all hail the mods.gif
 
As long as Taz is out here teaching new mods how to correctly interpret and sanitize member posts... using the 'fruit of the poisoned tree'... moderation policy... it's all good. :cool:

(Not that he follows a single one of those rules himself, the magnificent hypocrite.). :nono:

He’s still a vast, glowing improvement over the staff we had circa 2010.

Those absolute gremlins would’ve moderated a polite “good morning” into a three-day ban and a war crimes tribunal. 🤷‍♂️
They used to believe you, me, liability, Mal and oddball were all the same person

And they was right as the sheriff said in Blazing Saddles
 
They used to believe you, me, liability, Mal and oddball were all the same person
idiots, even in the early days.
Nah. Oddball was always a dirty maude who used a thumb drive to compile lists on members ... and got caught, and got banned for years. Who banned Oddball?

c_k banned him.

While Liability was always his own person, mal as well was never seen as me except by idiots.

While, you were always seen as an idiot... by me. :thup:
 
BQ: Who got Oddball back?

A: April.

After c_k left.
 
Because I hurt your feelz

:lol:

You've never won an argument with me, skippy.

Here you go:

Motion: Technological unemployment and AI capability growth are net positive for human flourishing.

It's merely short-term pain, massive long-term gain.

You, along with the Luddites and doomers, are wrong (again).
 
:omg:




just recalling the past, ropes - is all.

isn't that allowed?...

You know you didn't link the thread in your post, right? So I went back and did a search on all relevant words and users. I found another reference of you SAYING I called you a demon, but not of my og post.

I have no doubt I said you were saying demonic things. I often say this if it strikes me as true.

For those who are reasonable and still reading: there's a vast difference between saying someone is:

1. Satan Himself
2. A demon
3. Possessed by a demon
4. Saying demonic things (which are often said on this board)

The opposite of this is saying someone:

1. Is God Himself
2. Is a literal angel
3. Is being completely taken over by the Holy Spirit (see: Pentecost)
4. Is godly

People can and do say godly or demonic things all the time (more the latter here, generally). That neither means they are possessed by a spirit and/or ARE that entity.

Another example is: I believe abortion is demonic. I believe Satan engineered and controls it. I DO NOT believe everyone who gets an abortion is a demon or possessed by a demon. They are, however, mostly unwittingly participating in the demonic.
 
Mods are good to have on a forum - to a point.

What USMB really needs though is a truth and fact detector.

One that puts false claims and denials to rest and the mods would be a part of that - subject to being fact checked themselves.
 
15th post
You know you didn't link the thread in your post, right? So I went back and did a search on all relevant words and users. I found another reference of you SAYING I called you a demon, but not of my og post.

I have no doubt I said you were saying demonic things. I often say this if it strikes me as true.

For those who are reasonable and still reading: there's a vast difference between saying someone is:

1. Satan Himself
2. A demon
3. Possessed by a demon
4. Saying demonic things (which are often said on this board)

The opposite of this is saying someone:

1. Is God Himself
2. Is a literal angel
3. Is being completely taken over by the Holy Spirit (see: Pentecost)
4. Is godly

People can and do say godly or demonic things all the time (more the latter here, generally). That neither means they are possessed by a spirit and/or ARE that entity.

Another example is: I believe abortion is demonic. I believe Satan engineered and controls it. I DO NOT believe everyone who gets an abortion is a demon or possessed by a demon. They are, however, mostly unwittingly participating in the demonic.
So, did you just leave open the possibility that Playtime is one of Satan's lesser minions, but incapable of exercising her full demonic powers on this worldly plane?
 
Back
Top Bottom