Supreme Court’s desire to be seen as neutral arbiter

[Billy_Kinetta]

If that is the desire of the Court, it is already in error. The Court's job is to rule in favor of the Constitution, hardly a neutral position.

As Trump cases arrive, Supreme Court’s desire to be seen as neutral arbiter will be tested

 

[jwoodie]

Neutral means not favoring either party. The Constitution is not a party.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Neutral means not favoring either party. The Constitution is not a party.

Neutral means favoring nothing.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

If that is the desire of the Court, it is already in error. The Court's job is to rule in favor of the Constitution, hardly a neutral position.

As Trump cases arrive, Supreme Court’s desire to be seen as neutral arbiter will be tested

Your entire society has been in error for quite some time. As for your so called constitution, it was used as ass wipe and flushed long ago. Your last constitutional war was WWII.

 

[Oddball]

They haven't been a neutral arbiter since Marbury v. Madison.

Best that congress repealed the legislation that brought them into existence.