string of whistleblowers and leaks exposing the ‘safe and effective’ lie

They suck. Period. They're set up artists..and not very good ones. Associating the term "investigative journalism" with these clowns would be like assigning the word "competent" to describe Donald Trump. :)

This was not a set up, This whistleblower volunteered to expose what's going on....
 
Either the person said it or they didn't say it.
The entire article is third person heresay and bullshit. Nothing from this lady's family or even close friends.
Again, you want legitimacy, provide a legitimate source. Otherwise, the story is incomplete..or it didn't happen.
 
The entire article is third person heresay and bullshit. Nothing from this lady's family or even close friends.
Again, you want legitimacy, provide a legitimate source. Otherwise, the story is incomplete..or it didn't happen.
Unless, of course, you want to believe it.
 
There’s not a lot of verifiable information there.

An ER doc decided someone had a vaccine reaction. If you know anything about ER doctors, they don’t do the work up necessary to determine that.

But let’s say they’re right and it was a vaccine reaction. Okay. They then claim that it wasn’t reported. We don’t know who failed to report it and we don’t get their side of the story. We also have no way of determining if that allegation is true or not.

I was part of several cases of myocarditis that I think was associated with the vaccine. They were all reported. And yes, it does take time to do it, but that’s hardly an impediment (as the article asserts). They need good information in those reports to be actionable.
 
The entire article is third person heresay and bullshit. Nothing from this lady's family or even close friends.
Again, you want legitimacy, provide a legitimate source. Otherwise, the story is incomplete..or it didn't happen.
We know, you're scared. Take a few deep breaths and calm down.
 

Forum List

Back
Top