What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Stereotype or Slander????

OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
122,745
Reaction score
57,225
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
7. Why are so many citizens in the West so mislead about the origins and aims of Islam?

Democrats. Leftists. Progressives. They lie about everything, even at the cost of their own annihilation.
They lie in support of the Bolsheviks, and the IslamoFascists.





The Bolsheviks abhorred religion.

Roosevelt swore to the American public the exact opposite: he declared that Stalin fought for the same ideals!

September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR. "The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow," by Dennis J. Dunn, p. 137



More central to this thread is Hussein Obama’s lies about Islam.

“That President Obama told a series of brazen lies about Islam in his December 3 Baltimore speech is being well documented by experts on Islam.

Why he did it – and why the Left in America is defending those lies — is more important for patriots to understand.” Why Did Obama Tell Brazen Lies at the Baltimore Mosque?





President Obama: “So let’s start with this fact: For more than a thousand years, people have been drawn to Islam’s message of peace. And the very word itself, ‘Islam,’ comes from ‘salam’ — peace.”

Why did Obama say this? Even Muslim websites acknowledge that “Islam” means “submission” [to Allah], that it comes from the Arabic root “aslama” meaning submission, and that “Islam” is in the command form of that verb.

That’s why “Muslim” means “One who submits,” not “One who is peaceful.”
You Don't Know What Obama Said at the Mosque - The Dennis Prager Show





Obama’s mosque visit demonstrates tacit acceptance of a form of gender apartheid

..... President Obama’s visit to the Islamic Society of Baltimore represents a step backwards


To Muslim women’s rights activists fighting for equal access to mosques as part of a broader campaign for reform — from equal education for women and girls to freedom from so-called “honor killings” — the president’s visit to a mosque that practices such blatant inequity represents a step backwards. While it may be meant to convey a message of religious inclusiveness to American Muslims, the visit demonstrates tacit acceptance of a form of discrimination that amounts to gender apartheid.

As President and Michelle Obama argued decades ago in the context of the U.S. civil rights movement, separate is indeed unequal.

To condone the mosque’s gender segregation is particularly ironic coming days after the White House announced efforts to win equal pay for women and increased workplace benefits for women in the military.

“While the free world awaits a Muslim reformation, the leader of the free world shows blatant disregard for gender equality by visiting a mosque that treats females like second-class citizens,” says Raheel Raza, a Pakistani-Canadian activist,....”
http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenint...cit-acceptance-of-a-form-of-gender-apartheid/





But, heck….it’s Democrat Hussein siding with his co-religionists.

And Democrat voters fall right in line.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
122,745
Reaction score
57,225
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
C-16 contributes to Canada's standing on 'freedom', as opposed to America's intolerance of others and thus much lower rating among countries as pertains to 'freedom'.
I understand very well that this is a concept that many Americans don't accept.

We are much more aware that individual freedoms are conditional on 'freedoms' for all.

I think that has a lot to do with our failure to connect on just about anything. I suggest we could turn back to Jesse Jackson's words as an issue on which we might be able to agree.

Thank you for laying the personal insults aside. We're both going to have to work to keep it that way!



Coercing the speech that the government demands is exactly what one would expect from your sort of Nazi.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
122,745
Reaction score
57,225
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
8. Now, about that convert to Islam in the OP, who decided to assassinate his fellow countrymen….



“Religious conversion is common to innumerable religions, yet it would appear that only one religion seems to motivate some of its converts to commit terrorism around the world.

Why don’t recent converts to Jainism, orthodox Judaism, or Buddhism ever seem to “misinterpret” their peaceful religions and become terrorists? Somehow only one religion seems to produce converts who repeatedly misinterpret, mistranslate, and misunderstand their otherwise “peaceful” faith.

Numerous countries maintain official lists of terror organizations, and so it is instructive to examine the distribution of ideologies that drive such terror groups. …. I list the sixty-eight current terror groups present on the U.S. Department of State’s Foreign Terrorist Organization List. Eighty-one percent of the terror groups (fifty-five of them) are Islamic. Two other terrorist groups (the Kurdistan Workers Party and the Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party/Front) are largely composed of Muslim individuals but their founding is not rooted in Islamic theology.



The Canadian government maintains the Public Safety Canada’s list of terrorist organizations. It lists fifty-five terror groups, of which forty-four are Islamic (80 percent). These Islamic groups vary along ethnic, racial, linguistic, economic, political, and geo- graphical lines but are united by a common religious ideology.”
Gad Saad, “The Parasitic Mind.”



And what is the Democrat Party’s response to the above???

Amazingly.....this:
Guarantee nuclear weapons to the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism…..Muslim Iran.
 

Clyde 154

Gold Member
Joined
May 30, 2021
Messages
1,132
Reaction score
363
Points
208
8. Now, about that convert to Islam in the OP, who decided to assassinate his fellow countrymen….



“Religious conversion is common to innumerable religions, yet it would appear that only one religion seems to motivate some of its converts to commit terrorism around the world.

Why don’t recent converts to Jainism, orthodox Judaism, or Buddhism ever seem to “misinterpret” their peaceful religions and become terrorists? Somehow only one religion seems to produce converts who repeatedly misinterpret, mistranslate, and misunderstand their otherwise “peaceful” faith.

Numerous countries maintain official lists of terror organizations, and so it is instructive to examine the distribution of ideologies that drive such terror groups. …. I list the sixty-eight current terror groups present on the U.S. Department of State’s Foreign Terrorist Organization List. Eighty-one percent of the terror groups (fifty-five of them) are Islamic. Two other terrorist groups (the Kurdistan Workers Party and the Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party/Front) are largely composed of Muslim individuals but their founding is not rooted in Islamic theology.



The Canadian government maintains the Public Safety Canada’s list of terrorist organizations. It lists fifty-five terror groups, of which forty-four are Islamic (80 percent). These Islamic groups vary along ethnic, racial, linguistic, economic, political, and geo- graphical lines but are united by a common religious ideology.”
Gad Saad, “The Parasitic Mind.”



And what is the Democrat Party’s response to the above???

Amazingly.....this:
Guarantee nuclear weapons to the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism…..Muslim Iran.
Indeed...........denying the fact that by majority the republic of the Untied States of America was founded upon Judeo/Christian philosophies........in the fact that our system of government is based primarily upon Blackstones' commentaries on the Laws of England, that in effect was based upon the principles of a Judeo/Christian philosophy as found in the Holy Scriptures.......IS JUST ANOTHER FORM OF RACE BAITING (replace race with religion) and they(elite socialists..i.e., WHITE LIBERALS by majority) use the same tactics to divide the populous of the United States of America in order to control the narrative.

 
Last edited:
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
122,745
Reaction score
57,225
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
9. “Several databases and websites keep track of documented terror attacks around the world. These include the University of Maryland’s Global Terrorism Database, Wikipedia, and the Religion of Peace website. The latter maintains a running counter of the number of Islamic terror attacks since September 11, 2001.



As of July 19, 2019, there have been 35,339 Islamist terror attacks in nearly 70 countries. This is astronomically higher than all other religions combined. The National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism produced a background report of global terrorism (for the year 2017) including the number of victims killed by the twenty most active terror groups.

An astonishing 96.6 percent of the victims were murdered by Islamic groups (19,089 out of 19,752).”

“This Day in History,” The Religion of Peace, July 19, 2019, https:// archive.is/Qwzrl .

Erin Miller, “Global Terrorism in 2017,” National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, July 2018, https:// www.start.umd.edu/pubs/START_GTD_Overview2017_July2018.pdf





Soooo…..stereotype…or slander of Islam?
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
122,745
Reaction score
57,225
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
That's inappropriate behaviour. You'll get another chance.


Unlike your side, our side provides the truth.....and, readers of your rants would most likely agree with his description.


But, I bet you get that a lot, huh?
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
122,745
Reaction score
57,225
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
And, another one....


"Suicide bomb explosion rips through a Shiite mosque in northern Afghanistan

A horrific bombing in the northern Afghan province of Kunduz killed dozens of people yesterday as they worshipped at a mosque. It is the worst attack in the country since the U.S. withdrawal.
.... latest reports put the number of dead at around 50 - a little bit less than 50, with over 140 injured. You know, from photos of the scene, it really looked like a tight space. It wasn't a huge mosque. The photos that I saw showed the ceiling was charred. The floor was littered with debris. This was a Shiite mosque, and it was Friday afternoon, which is a time when mosques are often at their most crowded as people gather for Friday prayer. The Islamic State Khorasan, which is also known as ISIS-K, claimed responsibility for this attack. ISIS-K is a branch or an affiliate in Afghanistan of the Islamic State."




"‘Radical Islamic terrorism’: Three words that separate Trump from most of Washington"​



Of course, Trump was correct again.
 

Donald H

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2020
Messages
12,740
Reaction score
4,145
Points
208
And what is the Democrat Party’s response to the above???

Amazingly.....this:
Guarantee nuclear weapons to the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism…..Muslim Iran.
The existing agreement was destroyed on the grounds that it wasn't working even though all parties to the agreement except America were content that it was.

Negotiations are currently taking place but Iran has no incentive to make any significant changes that will interfere with their right to the peaceful use of nuclear technology.

This leaves America and the Zionist apartheid regime in the uncomfortable position of starting yet another war.

A new deal may be eventually reached but it won't be more desirable to the US and the apartheid regime. And now a situation exists in which war is prohibitive, for reasons that can be explained if anybody wants to know.

The short answer is that Biden isn't going to start a war with Iran and the Zionist regime is much too vulnerable to do it themselves. Very powerful alliances have been created.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
122,745
Reaction score
57,225
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
The existing agreement was destroyed on the grounds that it wasn't working even though all parties to the agreement except America were content that it was.

Negotiations are currently taking place but Iran has no incentive to make any significant changes that will interfere with their right to the peaceful use of nuclear technology.

This leaves America and the Zionist apartheid regime in the uncomfortable position of starting yet another war.

A new deal may be eventually reached but it won't be more desirable to the US and the apartheid regime. And now a situation exists in which war is prohibitive, for reasons that can be explained if anybody wants to know.

The short answer is that Biden isn't going to start a war with Iran and the Zionist regime is much too vulnerable to do it themselves. Very powerful alliances have been created.



Why should the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism be allowed....guaranteed......nuclear weapons?

Only the parties that you support, Communists, Nazis, Fascists, Democrats......the death parties....see arming this regime as sensible.


Of course, you are the one who has posted that mass murder is a practical way to prosperity.


As an earlier poster correctly noted....you're a moron.
 

surada

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
45,003
Reaction score
19,567
Points
2,488
6. “Bill Warner, a former professor of physics and founder of the Center for the Study of Political Islam has conducted content analyses on the three canonical sources of Islam:

…the Qur’an (which represents the inerrant, universal, and eternal word of Allah),

…the hadith (the amalgamation of the traditions, deeds, and sayings of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam),

…and the Sira (the biography of Muhammad).

Warner has analyzed the percentages of the three texts that are devoted to the Kafir (pejorative term for non-Muslims), to Jew-hatred, to politics, and to Jihad (holy war against non-believers). The conclusions are striking. For example, 51 per- cent of the trilogy of texts is devoted to uncomplimentary and unloving portrayals of the Kafir, and there is more Jew-hatred in the trilogy (9.3 percent) than in Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (7 percent).”
Bill Warner, “Statistical Islam,” Center for the Study of Political Islam, http:// www.cspipublishing.com/statistical/pdf/Statistical_Islam.pdf



Any of those three sources reformed since the 7th century?

Any apply to Iran?

Did the Democrats demand any alteration before guaranteeing nuclear weapons to Iran?
If you read garbage, you get garbage.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$45.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top