State Pot Laws Usurping the Fed Means Abortion Is Next...

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Dec 23, 2009
35,021
15,302
1,590
Middle class, suburban ghetto.
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.
 
The ole 'Slippery Slope' argument.
When you can't actually think of any real reason to disagree.
 
Remember how the Democrat States refuse to help INS and ICE enforce our immigration laws.
The Sanctuary States are telling everyone that the Racist Democratic Party values criminals over American Citizens.
 
26230275_10208108346425729_8123960665866839172_n.jpg
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

Guy, they rarely arrested abortion providers when abortion was "illegal".

The problem you anti-choice nutters make is you think that before 1973, America was a happy land free of evil abortions.

Nope. Before 1973, women had abortions, doctors wrote down something else on their charts, and the only time someone got arrested is if the provider messed up and sent the woman to the hospital.

They never arrested women for having them, because no one would have tolerated that.
 
I seriously pray we never go back to the days where women have to resort to using coat hangers again. Those weren't pleasant times.
 
Beauregard is right

I smoked a joint yesterday and all of a sudden felt compelled to dance with colored people... I went up to black woman and started dancing and she slapped the shit out of me...marijuana is a dangerous drug
Try a white woman next time. She won't be able to dance, but she won't be as racist or violent.
Dude I was doing the Lambada
I'm a chick, but the macarena is so much more recent.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

It can't happen. The difference is that state laws prohibiting abortion would conflict with the Constitution because of Roe vs Wade. State laws regarding legalization of pot do not conflict with the Constitution.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

Selling pot doesn't violate any right. Restricting abortion does.

You don't know what you're talking about.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

It can't happen. The difference is that state laws prohibiting abortion would conflict with the Constitution because of Roe vs Wade. State laws regarding legalization of pot do not conflict with the Constitution.

Trivial detail. Hardly worth mentioning.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

Guy, they rarely arrested abortion providers when abortion was "illegal".

The problem you anti-choice nutters make is you think that before 1973, America was a happy land free of evil abortions.

Nope. Before 1973, women had abortions, doctors wrote down something else on their charts, and the only time someone got arrested is if the provider messed up and sent the woman to the hospital.

They never arrested women for having them, because no one would have tolerated that.

That's right. Even GW Bush when he was 25 got his girlfriend an illegal abortion. The woman was going to come forward but the GOP put a cabosh on her speaking out.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

Guy, they rarely arrested abortion providers when abortion was "illegal".

The problem you anti-choice nutters make is you think that before 1973, America was a happy land free of evil abortions.

Nope. Before 1973, women had abortions, doctors wrote down something else on their charts, and the only time someone got arrested is if the provider messed up and sent the woman to the hospital.

They never arrested women for having them, because no one would have tolerated that.
I'm not anti-abortion. I'm only pointing out the possible ramifications of states usurping the Fed.
Moron.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

It can't happen. The difference is that state laws prohibiting abortion would conflict with the Constitution because of Roe vs Wade. State laws regarding legalization of pot do not conflict with the Constitution.
Now you're doing the semantic dance.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

Guy, they rarely arrested abortion providers when abortion was "illegal".

The problem you anti-choice nutters make is you think that before 1973, America was a happy land free of evil abortions.

Nope. Before 1973, women had abortions, doctors wrote down something else on their charts, and the only time someone got arrested is if the provider messed up and sent the woman to the hospital.

They never arrested women for having them, because no one would have tolerated that.
I'm not anti-abortion. I'm only pointing out the possible ramifications of states usurping the Fed.
Moron.

No, you're not. As there is a right to abortion. There is no right to not have pot sold in a State.

Completely different basis.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

Selling pot doesn't violate any right. Restricting abortion does.

You don't know what you're talking about.
More rights bullshit. Rights don't involve others beyond the individual.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

It can't happen. The difference is that state laws prohibiting abortion would conflict with the Constitution because of Roe vs Wade. State laws regarding legalization of pot do not conflict with the Constitution.
Now you're doing the semantic dance.

No, he's accurately citing the fact that abortion is a constitutionally protected right.

Pot laws aren't.

You may not know the difference but the courts certainly do.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

Guy, they rarely arrested abortion providers when abortion was "illegal".

The problem you anti-choice nutters make is you think that before 1973, America was a happy land free of evil abortions.

Nope. Before 1973, women had abortions, doctors wrote down something else on their charts, and the only time someone got arrested is if the provider messed up and sent the woman to the hospital.

They never arrested women for having them, because no one would have tolerated that.
I'm not anti-abortion. I'm only pointing out the possible ramifications of states usurping the Fed.
Moron.

No, you're not. As there is a right to abortion. There is no right to not have pot sold in a State.

Completely different basis.
Abortion is not a right as it involves two or more individuals. You just call it that as an excuse.
 
If states get away with disregarding federal law and continue to legalize pot at the state level, state legislatures can then arrest abortion providers if they enact state laws prohibiting abortion. The Fed be damned.
Pothead lefties better watch out for what they wish for.

Selling pot doesn't violate any right. Restricting abortion does.

You don't know what you're talking about.
More rights bullshit. Rights don't involve others beyond the individual.

Rights are protection from government interference. Women have the right to have an abortion without the government interfering with them.

Pot laws are conflicts between state and federal powers.

Rights and powers are *not* the same thing. The conflicts you're speaking of have entirely different bases.
 

Forum List

Back
Top