Stanford study quietly published at NIH.gov proves face masks are absolutely worthless against Covid

EvMetro

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
10,328
6,730
970
From the study itself (emphasis added):

Conclusion
The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.
 
Lefties are going to have to attack the source on this one, since they won't be able to dispute the content.

:thankusmile: The lefties can only sling shit in defeat like the money trolls they are.:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Lefties are going to have to attack the source on this one, since they won't be able to dispute the content.

:thankusmile: The lefties can only sling shit in defeat like the money trolls they are.:abgg2q.jpg:
Lefties are shameless creatures. They will read the opening post and still post something besides an attack on the content.
 
Yeah, I had a thread about this a few days ago. :smile:

 
I didn't need a study to tell me this. It's common sense.

1618694029279.png


1618694527592.png
 
Lefties are going to have to attack the source on this one, since they won't be able to dispute the content.

Nice try but nope. There are countless medical... that is medical websites that confirm that masks worn in crowded public areas reduce the amount of viral particles released into the air by coughing, sneezing and simply exhaling by an infected person. Masks also reduce the distance any viral particles will travel. As for everyday masks causing hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, again, nope. But if you can provide three, no, we'll say two actual accredited medical websites that state otherwise, you're in business. The American Conservative Movement website won't do. Neither will anything from DC Comics or The Gateway Pundit.
 
Lefties are going to have to attack the source on this one, since they won't be able to dispute the content.

Nice try but nope. There are countless medical... that is medical websites that confirm that masks worn in crowded public areas reduce the amount of viral particles released into the air by coughing, sneezing and simply exhaling by an infected person. Masks also reduce the distance any viral particles will travel. As for everyday masks causing hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, again, nope. But if you can provide three, no, we'll say two actual accredited medical websites that state otherwise, you're in business. The American Conservative Movement website won't do. Neither will anything from DC Comics or The Gateway Pundit.
Yes, leftists sure do like to give lip service to science, but not when is disagrees with their dogma.

But you're on record as claiming Stanford University and the National Institute of Health are not accredited medical sources.
 
Lefties are going to have to attack the source on this one, since they won't be able to dispute the content.

Nice try but nope. There are countless medical... that is medical websites that confirm that masks worn in crowded public areas reduce the amount of viral particles released into the air by coughing, sneezing and simply exhaling by an infected person. Masks also reduce the distance any viral particles will travel. As for everyday masks causing hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, again, nope. But if you can provide three, no, we'll say two actual accredited medical websites that state otherwise, you're in business. The American Conservative Movement website won't do. Neither will anything from DC Comics or The Gateway Pundit.
..then why were there so many cases and deaths??
 
Lefties are going to have to attack the source on this one, since they won't be able to dispute the content.

Nice try but nope. There are countless medical... that is medical websites that confirm that masks worn in crowded public areas reduce the amount of viral particles released into the air by coughing, sneezing and simply exhaling by an infected person. Masks also reduce the distance any viral particles will travel. As for everyday masks causing hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, again, nope. But if you can provide three, no, we'll say two actual accredited medical websites that state otherwise, you're in business. The American Conservative Movement website won't do. Neither will anything from DC Comics or The Gateway Pundit.
Yes, leftists sure do like to give lip service to science, but not when is disagrees with their dogma.

But you're on record as claiming Stanford University and the National Institute of Health are not accredited medical sources.
I'm on recorded as claiming that someone affiliated with Stanford (if he really is), does not make for a credible source. You are citing a published study that has been dismissed by the consensus of the medical profession. That's why it is in the American Conservative Movement website and not at the Johns Hopkins website.
 
Nice try but nope. There are countless medical... that is medical websites
Which site is more reputable than Stanford, the source you are attacking?
Here are some links to the real Stanford University medical community... Myth: Wearing a face mask is only helpful if the person wearing the mask has symptoms of Covid-19 | Digital MEdIC and Which mask works? Researchers find confusion over mask use for wildfire, COVID-19 crises .
You can tell there is an actual affiliation with Stanford when there is a Stanford.edu in the website address. Still, not as good as Johns Hopkins or the Mayo Clinic. The information you provided is one person and I am not convinced he, or his article, is connected to Stanford, the university. Regardless, you are citing a link provided by a biased, non medical website. You need to do better.
 
Lefties are going to have to attack the source on this one, since they won't be able to dispute the content.

Upgrade HVAC in public accommodation to HEPA standard as part of our infrastructure upgrade so we can stop using maskes.
 
Lefties are going to have to attack the source on this one, since they won't be able to dispute the content.

I added the scholarly link to Covid Panic is Overblown

It's been up for a year now and the sheep are still bleating loudly.
 
Lefties are going to have to attack the source on this one, since they won't be able to dispute the content.

I added the scholarly link to Covid Panic is Overblown

It's been up for a year now and the sheep are still bleating loudly.
Was the 1918 pandemic also, overblown?
 
Lefties are going to have to attack the source on this one, since they won't be able to dispute the content.

Nice try but nope. There are countless medical... that is medical websites that confirm that masks worn in crowded public areas reduce the amount of viral particles released into the air by coughing, sneezing and simply exhaling by an infected person. Masks also reduce the distance any viral particles will travel. As for everyday masks causing hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, again, nope. But if you can provide three, no, we'll say two actual accredited medical websites that state otherwise, you're in business. The American Conservative Movement website won't do. Neither will anything from DC Comics or The Gateway Pundit.
Take it up with Stanford. They are in no way, shape, or form, anywhere near the right of the center.
 

Forum List

Back
Top