‘So it's verboten?’: Fox News panelist stops Newt Gingrich from discussing ‘Soros-elected’ district attorneys

Just how stupid is that to say that DAs are Soros-elected.

That is like believing in conspiracy theories.
And how stupid are you say this? Sorros has poured tens of millions around the country getting far left
wing candidates elected to office, like in St. Louis where the couple that protected their home from roving
BLM rioters by bringing out guns were arrested on bogus charges by St. Louis prosecutor Kim Gardner
(someone backed by Sorros). Rep. Gardner gets aid from Soros in St. Louis circuit attorney race - The Missouri Times

Your lack of knowledge is shocking. Fox news is there to bury the news. Not reveal it.
 
So newt is still pushing right-wing conspiracy theories about Soros. Good for these folks who didn't allow him to spew this stuff on that air.

So Soros is linked to everything. How about the billionaires who are funding right-wing crap causes unbeknownst to the American public. Remember the Koch brothers? How about the Waltons, the Scaife/Mellons? Prince/Devoss filth? There are more of these people lurking in the shadows funding subversive efforts to attack our freedoms and way of life.

There is no "undisputed fact" here.
If Soros money can be tracked everywhere, why is it a conspiracy? Look at who he is funding, and what they are doing. It is black and white. I'll agree he isn't the only one dumping money into all kinds of races, but since there is a concrete link, why is it not allowed to be examined?

Soros can fund anything he wishes, and so can everybody else. What nefarious activities is he supposedly funding? I don't know of any. I doubt that he is funding any more causes and organizations than any other rich folks do, and he's been fairly open about what he does and why he does it. The right-wing billionaires seem to want secrecy.
I have no trouble tracing all the money. If republican donors were installing poeple like Kimberly Gardner in St. Louis or Kim Foxx in Chicago, I'd want to know. That is just two of the most obvious links to Soros money. I don't care which side is doing it. It needs to be front and center.
 
Just how stupid is that to say that DAs are Soros-elected.

That is like believing in conspiracy theories.
And how stupid are you say this? Sorros has poured tens of millions around the country getting far left
wing candidates elected to office, like in St. Louis where the couple that protected their home from roving
BLM rioters by bringing out guns were arrested on bogus charges by St. Louis prosecutor Kim Gardner
(someone backed by Sorros). Rep. Gardner gets aid from Soros in St. Louis circuit attorney race - The Missouri Times

Your lack of knowledge is shocking. Fox news is there to bury the news. Not reveal it.
Once again you spout your assertions as fact, Eric, and you ad hom because you have nothing else. Your Missouri Times is a fake news alternate facts rag, as you well know. But, at least, you are trying to document as you go. Yes, white hoods from the right are being arrested for infiltrating protests and trying to cause riots, a classic far right totalitarian tactic. You need to do your research, kiddo.
 
WTF is going on at FOX NEWS?

I'll tell you what's going on at Fox......they're really just a bunch of liberals lying to us about what their real agenda is.




We going to get a thread a day on this? This should be combined.


All of these right wing threads about conspiracy theories like voter fraud, media bias, etc... should be shit canned into the conspiracy section.

Media bias. For the love of God, you call media bias a conspiracy topic?


Yep. As long as there has been a media, there has been bias. Crying foul as much as you poor boys and girls do and claiming there is some sort of giant cabal of media coordinating their stories is the stuff of conspiracies.
 
WTF is going on at FOX NEWS?

I'll tell you what's going on at Fox......they're really just a bunch of liberals lying to us about what their real agenda is.




We going to get a thread a day on this? This should be combined.


All of these right wing threads about conspiracy theories like voter fraud, media bias, etc... should be shit canned into the conspiracy section.

Media bias. For the love of God, you call media bias a conspiracy topic?


Yep. As long as there has been a media, there has been bias. Crying foul as much as you poor boys and girls do and claiming there is some sort of giant cabal of media coordinating their stories is the stuff of conspiracies.

Sure. Is that why they all run the same stories using the exact same phrases? Just one big coincidence. Ever wonder why the bias leans overwhelmingly in one direction? Now the media is giving debate questions and aiding people in actual debates(Crawley). Nothing to see here, right?
 
Why is it the Trumpbumplican media run the same stories using the exact same phrases?
 
WTF is going on at FOX NEWS?

I'll tell you what's going on at Fox......they're really just a bunch of liberals lying to us about what their real agenda is.




We going to get a thread a day on this? This should be combined.


All of these right wing threads about conspiracy theories like voter fraud, media bias, etc... should be shit canned into the conspiracy section.

Media bias. For the love of God, you call media bias a conspiracy topic?


Yep. As long as there has been a media, there has been bias. Crying foul as much as you poor boys and girls do and claiming there is some sort of giant cabal of media coordinating their stories is the stuff of conspiracies.

Sure. Is that why they all run the same stories using the exact same phrases? Just one big coincidence. Ever wonder why the bias leans overwhelmingly in one direction? Now the media is giving debate questions and aiding people in actual debates(Crawley). Nothing to see here, right?


You're making stuff up to suit your own narrative.
 
WTF is going on at FOX NEWS?

I'll tell you what's going on at Fox......they're really just a bunch of liberals lying to us about what their real agenda is.




We going to get a thread a day on this? This should be combined.


All of these right wing threads about conspiracy theories like voter fraud, media bias, etc... should be shit canned into the conspiracy section.

Media bias. For the love of God, you call media bias a conspiracy topic?


Yep. As long as there has been a media, there has been bias. Crying foul as much as you poor boys and girls do and claiming there is some sort of giant cabal of media coordinating their stories is the stuff of conspiracies.

Sure. Is that why they all run the same stories using the exact same phrases? Just one big coincidence. Ever wonder why the bias leans overwhelmingly in one direction? Now the media is giving debate questions and aiding people in actual debates(Crawley). Nothing to see here, right?

Ever notice that everyone who asks a question at these townhalls is reading from a piece of paper.....that was admittedly provided to them by the campaign?
Trump will answer any question.....like "Why must you lie to the American people all of the time?"
Do you hear them accusing lying Joe of the same BS? Never.
 
WTF is going on at FOX NEWS?

I'll tell you what's going on at Fox......they're really just a bunch of liberals lying to us about what their real agenda is.




We going to get a thread a day on this? This should be combined.


All of these right wing threads about conspiracy theories like voter fraud, media bias, etc... should be shit canned into the conspiracy section.

Media bias. For the love of God, you call media bias a conspiracy topic?


Yep. As long as there has been a media, there has been bias. Crying foul as much as you poor boys and girls do and claiming there is some sort of giant cabal of media coordinating their stories is the stuff of conspiracies.

Sure. Is that why they all run the same stories using the exact same phrases? Just one big coincidence. Ever wonder why the bias leans overwhelmingly in one direction? Now the media is giving debate questions and aiding people in actual debates(Crawley). Nothing to see here, right?


You're making stuff up to suit your own narrative.

Donna Brazille, Candy Crawley. Brazille provided debate questions in advance, and Crawley chimed in on Obama's behalf in a debate with Romney. 90% negative coverage rate. 65% believable for a terrible subject, 75% pushing credibility, 90% plus - just an out and out part of a political party.
 
Apparently bringing up George Soros in a bad light is now 'anti-semitism'......
 
If someone from the early 1800's could come back to America today......

They would be in shock and wonder when America became a Communist state.
We are so far gone, but it's been incremental and each successive step has been slowly accepted by younger generations.

Seriously....compared to 100 years ago....WE ARE ALREADY a Communist state.
And the conversion will not stop.
It takes a massive uprising by the People to stop it. Practically Civil war......and they have already stated they refuse to fight for their liberties.
There ya have it.

You may not live to see it fully implemented, but future generations will see a Communist state in America. We're more than half way there now
if they can mandate health care, masks and closing of your business.
 
WTF is going on at FOX NEWS?

I'll tell you what's going on at Fox......they're really just a bunch of liberals lying to us about what their real agenda is.




We going to get a thread a day on this? This should be combined.


All of these right wing threads about conspiracy theories like voter fraud, media bias, etc... should be shit canned into the conspiracy section.

Media bias. For the love of God, you call media bias a conspiracy topic?


Yep. As long as there has been a media, there has been bias. Crying foul as much as you poor boys and girls do and claiming there is some sort of giant cabal of media coordinating their stories is the stuff of conspiracies.

Sure. Is that why they all run the same stories using the exact same phrases? Just one big coincidence. Ever wonder why the bias leans overwhelmingly in one direction? Now the media is giving debate questions and aiding people in actual debates(Crawley). Nothing to see here, right?


You're making stuff up to suit your own narrative.

Donna Brazille, Candy Crawley. Brazille provided debate questions in advance, and Crawley chimed in on Obama's behalf in a debate with Romney. 90% negative coverage rate. 65% believable for a terrible subject, 75% pushing credibility, 90% plus - just an out and out part of a political party.


Still waiting on the "same stories using the same phrases" proof.

Brazille--who was a higher up in the DNC--gave the democrat a heads up on a debate with a non-democrat...who both were running for the Democratic Party nomination? Wow...shocking stuff there. NOT!

Crawley corrected Romney. If the truth hurts, you've got more problems than we thought.

Not sure what all of the unsubstantiated numbers mean. Trump's policies are highly unpopular and he is human garbage...his supporters act like garbage...which is why his favorables are in the gutter. Whether polling turns into voting...that is a valid question.
 
If someone from the early 1800's could come back to America today......

They would be in shock and wonder when America became a Communist state.
We are so far gone, but it's been incremental and each successive step has been slowly accepted by younger generations.

Seriously....compared to 100 years ago....WE ARE ALREADY a Communist state.
And the conversion will not stop.
It takes a massive uprising by the People to stop it. Practically Civil war......and they have already stated they refuse to fight for their liberties.
There ya have it.

You may not live to see it fully implemented, but future generations will see a Communist state in America. We're more than half way there now
if they can mandate health care, masks and closing of your business.
There were communists in 1800? I thought they came around in the 1900's.
 
George Soros owns — or I would assume his interests and estate trusts collectively own — a very large stake in Fox News and other mainstream media, along with fellow Democrats Michael Bloomberg, Thomas Steyer, and Warren Buffett. The station has historically been run somewhat as a "limited hangout" for conservative "Establishment-approved" commentary and opinions, but I suppose calling in question the neutrality of its ownership interests on air did trigger the host to object.
 
“During Thursday’s program, “Outnumbered” co-host Harris Faulkner responded to the incident, saying it was “not smooth.” She acknowledged, “former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who is beloved and needed to be allowed to speak with the openness and respect that this show is all about, was interrupted,” and went on to conclude that “we do not censor on this show.”
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top