So How Was 2005?

[Annie]

This article reminded me that as we near the end of the year, it's a time of reflection, planning, and resolutions.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pdupont/?id=110007706

The Decade's Midpoint
In 2005 America's economy grew while Kofi Annan shrank.

BY PETE DU PONT
Wednesday, December 21, 2005 12:01 a.m.

North Korea says the Bush administration "is made up of political imbeciles and master hands at faking up lies." The president of Iran says there was no Holocaust, the whole thing was a myth. And Russia continues its return to communism, intending to require all nongovernmental organizations to register with and have their programs approved by the government. From year to year, some things never change.

But there were some significant happenings this year that may change the way the world works. Two thousand five saw a very strong American economy and some real success in the U.S. effort to bring freedom to the people of Iraq and defeat Islamic terrorism. The bad news was a Republican congressional failure to control federal spending and limit the expansion of the federal government, and the United Nations' failure to reform after its participation in the greatest corruption scandal in the history of the modern world.

The good news is that the American economy is doing very well: 10 consecutive quarters of 4% annualized economic growth, which helped create 1.8 million new jobs this year and four million in the past two years. The tax cuts of the Bush administration are one of the reasons for this success, for they stimulate economic growth, and that growth produced a 14.6% increase in federal tax revenues in 2005. Even liberals should be happy, for the percentage of income taxes paid by the top 1% of taxpayers has grown from 19.3% in 1980 (before the Reagan tax cuts) to 27% in 1988 and 34% currently.

The war for freedom in Iraq is progressing too. Iraqis held their third purple-thumb election last week, electing a legislature following a transitional assembly in January and approving their constitution in October. Ten million people voted in an election that even the New York Times called "an overwhelming and heartening triumph." The Iraqi economy is stable and growing. Per capita income is now more that $1,000, double what it was in 2003; there are 30,000 new businesses, Sixty percent of the U.S. Agency for International Development's business-development grants have gone to women; there are five million new cell phones and hundreds of radio stations, magazines and television stations that did not exist under Saddam Hussein's dictatorship.

We are also slowly succeeding in the war against Islamic terrorism, a global war that al Qaeda terrorists brought to U.S. embassies in Africa, the USS Cole, Bali, Spain, England, Jordan and of course the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Winning that war and bringing freedom to the people of Iraq are our primary goals, and we are making progress on both fronts. As President Bush said on Sunday evening, we are moving toward "a democratic Iraq that can defend itself, that will never again be a safe haven for terrorists and that will serve as a model for freedom in the Middle East."

Sen. Joe Lieberman expressed the most sensible foreign policy vision within the Democratic Party. He is a believer in freedom and opportunity for all people and the imperative of defending America's safety in a world vulnerable to terrorism. "It is a war between 27 million and 10,000," he wrote, referring to the war in Iraq: "27 million Iraqis who want to live lives of freedom, opportunity, and prosperity, and 10,000 terrorists . . . who know their wretched causes will be set back if Iraq becomes free and modern." Mr. Lieberman added, "The outcome of this war is critically important to the security and freedom of America."

The people of France and the Netherlands get top grades for voting down the nearly incomprehensible European Union constitution. Its adoption would have insured that socialist Europe never recovered from its economic doldrums. Over the past 25 years the European Union has added just four million new jobs while the U.S. has added 57 million. Now there is a better opportunity for European nations to adopt market economies.

And congratulations to Bill Buckley, who in October celebrated the 50th anniversary of the National Review magazine. For half century he has been the intellectual leader of conservative political thought, launching the vision that became America's public policy in the 1980s. Since he infuriated the educational establishment with the publication of "God and Man at Yale" in 1951, Bill has written 4,000 columns, 46 additional books, given thousands of talks, and for thirty-three years was the host of Firing Line. As President Bush said, Bill and his magazine "helped move conservatism from the margins of American society into the Oval office. That's a significant contribution." Indeed it is.

Then there are the failing grades of 2005. The Republican Congress--House and Senate--has dismally failed to control the growth of government. Spending has grown 5.6% a year since President Bush took office--about as high as LBJ's spending increases in the 1960s--and domestic spending has grown 7.1% a year. When Bill Clinton was president and Newt Gingrich was House speaker, congressionally approved nondefense spending was $57 billion less than the president requested; under Mr. Bush and Speaker Dennis Hastert it has been $91 billion more.

Republicans have been taking some heat for such big spending increases, so when the House adjourned early Monday morning it had agreed to cut federal spending by about $40 billion over five years, plus a one-time $8 billion defense budget cut. It sounds good, but it comes to only a 0.3% reduction in total federal spending, not exactly a significant shift from Republican spending increase policies.

One would think the president would have used his veto power to control the spending surge, but he hasn't used it at all. (The last president to serve a full term without issuing a veto was John Quincy Adams.) For starters he should have vetoed the highway bill, which contained 6,373 pork projects costing $24 billion.

Senate and House "moderates" are part of the problem too. Maine's Sen. Olympia Snowe opposes extending the tax cuts that have stimulated our economy, and Rhode Island's Sen. Lincoln Chafee opposes oil refinery construction on abandoned military bases (which would increase our fuel supplies) and tax cuts. In the House it is the 25 Republican moderates who have opposed most spending reductions and tried to block ANWR oil drilling in Alaska.

But the worst failing grade for the year goes to the United Nations and Kofi Annan. Paul Volker's report on the Oil for Food scandal concluded that $10 billion worth of Iraqi oil was illegally smuggled to adjacent nations; that Saddam Hussein collected $229 million in bribes from 139 of 248 companies involved in the oil business, and illegal payments from 2,253 out of 3,614 firms providing humanitarian goods to Iraq. So Dennis Kozlowski stole $600 million from Tyco and got eight to 25 years in jail, while Kofi Annan supervised more than $10 billion in Oil for Food theft and will stay in his job since, in his own words, "the business of the United Nations is not reform."

Walter Cronkite said on Larry King's show last fall that America is "an ignorant nation right now. We're really not capable . . . of making the decisions that have to be made at election time. . . . I don't think we're bright enough to do the job that would preserve our democracy, our republic." Perhaps that explains why the media believe they must be so vehemently critical of everything--they agree with Mr. Cronkite and Michael Moore that the rest of us are just plain dumb.

But Americans are the opposite of dumb; we are succeeding in improving our lives, expanding our economy, and promoting freedom and democracy around the world. We have done well in 2005 and will do even better in 2006.

So have a good holiday--or better still, may I wish you a politically incorrect merry Christmas!
Mr. du Pont, a former governor of Delaware, is chairman of the Dallas-based National Center for Policy Analysis. His column appears once a month.

 

[Nienna]

North Korea says the Bush administration "is made up of political imbeciles and master hands at faking up lies."

If it's a "fake lie," does that mean it's the truth?

 

[Annie]

I agree with Mr. DuPont's big picture essay. 2005 did see the UN further exposed for the failure it is; both in choice of 'leadership' and as a viable, credible institution for civilized nations to turn to.

The US is moving along; economically, socially, and perhaps even politically. I hope 2006 brings resolve of the administration to keep hammering home the successes it has and determination to right some of our problems here at home, most specifically the borders and the budget. I also hope that the administration really begins to address and lead the people of the US on which countries really are our allies and which aren't.

If the executive branch does what it should, I think Congress will be left with no choice but to follow and get some things done. If this does happen, there may well be the sea change of the electorate many of us expected after 9/11.

I hope, in all honesty probably fruitlessly, that 2006 brings awareness to the MSM that they must start reporting news and keeping editorializing to the correct section. IF they would do so, we might see the end of the hemorraging of readership of the nation's dailies, this is very necessary in a democracy. For all of my bashing of the MSM, at root is my dismay of what they are doing to themselves and to the people of the US. It didn't start with George Bush and won't end there, but at some point I do hope they recognize and begin to clean up their act.

Personally 2005 was a good and bad year, as I guess all are. All my children are doing well and are healthy. Best news was the 'little one' getting the resident assistant position at his university, saving him several thousand dollars in loans a year, while increasing his already substantial leadership skills. Coming in close was the daughter getting professional recognition of her vocal gifts in opera and the other son deciding to return to university for finance degree, paid for by his employer, a bank! Yep lots there to be proud and thankful of regarding the kids.

My dad though has had a rough year. He's in the hospital now and we're hoping he'll get out by Christmas. He is NOT a happy camper. At the same time, it seems that they will be able to clear the artery that they believe was causing him to get recurring vertigo. No doubt, considering he'll be 85 in less than 10 days, I guess he's really in pretty good shape. Still does the golf thing and manages to get to his grandchildren's concerts and competitions. He has his friends and gets out with them at least a couple of times a week.

At this time last year, I figured I'd be getting the MS diploma this month. Alas, $$$, family illnesses-on the father front, a realization that MS priced me out of gaining the public school positions I want, as well as acknowledging to myself that I don't want to be an administrator all came into play.

At the same time, thanks to the first year courses and books, I did increase my skills, especially regarding assessment choices and addressing some of the differences within my classes. That is a lot to gain.

In 2006, I am hoping to get into another master's program, many if not most of the other courses will transfer. The trick is to not have to pay for most, if not all of it. Crossing my fingers, things are looking possible. Two possibilites, one with history, another with political science. Either will do.

Well there is my first reflection. Anyone else?

 

[Nienna]

Walter Cronkite said on Larry King's show last fall that America is "an ignorant nation right now. We're really not capable . . . of making the decisions that have to be made at election time. . . . I don't think we're bright enough to do the job that would preserve our democracy, our republic." Perhaps that explains why the media believe they must be so vehemently critical of everything--they agree with Mr. Cronkite and Michael Moore that the rest of us are just plain dumb.

This particularly struck me. It's something I have long believed, that liberals do not believe "the People" are intelligent enough to govern themselves. And their voter base seems to prove it. In my (admittedly limited) experience, those who vote liberal are the ones who do not know what any of the issues are, what the candidates' voting records have been, etc. In this area, if a politican spouts "JOBS!" and the labor union backs him/her, that's good enough for Joe.

So, to translate Walter Cronkite's statement: "America is not buying the lines we want them to. They are not yet deceived enough to vote liberal at election time. We in the media have our work cut out for us if we want to snowball the public enough to turn our democracy, our republic into a socialist state."

Good Job, America!