So George Floyd was NOT Intentionally Murdered by a Racist White Cop?

[Doc7505]

So George Floyd was NOT Intentionally Murdered by a Racist White Cop?​

So George Floyd was NOT Intentionally Murdered by a Racist White Cop? (houstoncourant.com)
15 Mar 2021 ~~ By Michael P. Tremoglie



So far, the most interesting aspect of the trial of police officer Derek Chauvin are the crimes for which he has not been charged. Chauvin has been vilified for his role in the arrest-related-death of a man resisting arrest.
Despite almost a year of riots, ranting and raving by cable news, and even condemnations by supposedly law-and-order radio talk show hosts, Former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin is not being charged with the intentional murder of George Floyd. Chauvin is not even being charged with a hate crime. So one may be forgiven for being bewildered. After all, there were riots all over the United States, all over the world, about this innocent Black man allegedly being mercilessly killed by a White racist police officer. After all, the Attorney General of Minnesota is Keith Ellison, the first African-American Minnesota attorney general and the first Muslim Minnesota Attorney General.
How could this be?
So this is the dilemma for Derek Chauvin. He must prove his innocence - as opposed to the prosecution proving his guilt. There is no presumption of innocence for Derek Chauvin. His only chance for a fair trial is for him to have a jury of his peers and a trial judge who, unlike Amy Coney Barrett or Bill Barr, are not cowards. He needs an intrepid judge and jury. He needs a judge and jury who will stand firm against the Leftist Lynch Mob.
Tragically, for Derek Chauvin, for American justice, and for law abiding Americans intrepid judges and jurors do not seem likely.


Comment:
How many people have lost their lively hoods, businesses and yes their lives over this false narrative? Should we hold the Quisling Media liable? BLM? Antifa and the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Left politicians? They have destroyed lives and jobs by lying to the public.
In order to convict Chauvin, they need to charge him with something they can prove. Guessing they have investigated it and have the total truth.
Can Chauvin find an impartial judge and jury in the twin cities of Minneapolis/St. Paul? I doubt it and so does his Defense team of attorneys.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/03/15/derek-chauvin-george-floyd-trial/

**********​

Chauvin defense team asks for change of venue after George Floyd family settlement announcement

Ultimately the Marxist Left must convict him of something, anything, to pacify the racists they've created toavoid more riots.
The cop did what he was trained to do, what it was his duty to do, the evidence plainly shows that, but the Leftists are ready to launch (staged and paid?) angry mobs if the outcome of the trial is not to their liking.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

​

The cop did what he was trained to do, what it was his duty to do, the evidence plainly shows that

He didn't, it wasn't, and it doesn't.

 

[Doc7505]

​

The cop did what he was trained to do, what it was his duty to do, the evidence plainly shows that

He didn't, it wasn't, and it doesn't.

~~~~~~
"But a purely dispassionate examination of the facts indicates that Chauvin only attempted to restrain Floyd, who was under the influence of controlled substances and was struggling with police. Indeed, audio evidence, the recording of the conversations from the officers’ body cams, indicate that Chauvin only wanted to keep Floyd where he was until an ambulance arrived."
"Couple Chauvin’s stated intent with the fact that the immobilization technique Chauvin used was taught to Minneapolis officers (despite the claims of the mayor, the governor of Minnesota, and even the police chief who apparently is unaware - or does not want to admit- what his officers are trained to do). Then add that this technique has been used by mental health workers and others to restrain people who are violent. Also add that a similar technique was used four years earlier against a White man in Dallas, who was also under the influence of drugs and also died, and it will be damn near impossible to establish that Chauvin intended bodily harm. Indeed, it may be difficult to prove any crime."

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

So George Floyd was NOT Intentionally Murdered by a Racist White Cop?​

So George Floyd was NOT Intentionally Murdered by a Racist White Cop? (houstoncourant.com)
15 Mar 2021 ~~ By Michael P. Tremoglie



So far, the most interesting aspect of the trial of police officer Derek Chauvin are the crimes for which he has not been charged. Chauvin has been vilified for his role in the arrest-related-death of a man resisting arrest.
Despite almost a year of riots, ranting and raving by cable news, and even condemnations by supposedly law-and-order radio talk show hosts, Former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin is not being charged with the intentional murder of George Floyd. Chauvin is not even being charged with a hate crime. So one may be forgiven for being bewildered. After all, there were riots all over the United States, all over the world, about this innocent Black man allegedly being mercilessly killed by a White racist police officer. After all, the Attorney General of Minnesota is Keith Ellison, the first African-American Minnesota attorney general and the first Muslim Minnesota Attorney General.
How could this be?
So this is the dilemma for Derek Chauvin. He must prove his innocence - as opposed to the prosecution proving his guilt. There is no presumption of innocence for Derek Chauvin. His only chance for a fair trial is for him to have a jury of his peers and a trial judge who, unlike Amy Coney Barrett or Bill Barr, are not cowards. He needs an intrepid judge and jury. He needs a judge and jury who will stand firm against the Leftist Lynch Mob.
Tragically, for Derek Chauvin, for American justice, and for law abiding Americans intrepid judges and jurors do not seem likely.


Comment:
How many people have lost their lively hoods, businesses and yes their lives over this false narrative? Should we hold the Quisling Media liable? BLM? Antifa and the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Left politicians? They have destroyed lives and jobs by lying to the public.
In order to convict Chauvin, they need to charge him with something they can prove. Guessing they have investigated it and have the total truth.
Can Chauvin find an impartial judge and jury in the twin cities of Minneapolis/St. Paul? I doubt it and so does his Defense team of attorneys.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/03/15/derek-chauvin-george-floyd-trial/

**********​

Chauvin defense team asks for change of venue after George Floyd family settlement announcement

Ultimately the Marxist Left must convict him of something, anything, to pacify the racists they've created toavoid more riots.
The cop did what he was trained to do, what it was his duty to do, the evidence plainly shows that, but the Leftists are ready to launch (staged and paid?) angry mobs if the outcome of the trial is not to their liking.

God I hope he is acquitted....god I hope he is for overcharging. Let the fun begin.

I always wanted to see an interview with the woman he was robbing and pointing a gun right at her belly and telling her he'll shoot her fetus all over the wall.

He got what was coming to him. Everything he deserved.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

​

The cop did what he was trained to do, what it was his duty to do, the evidence plainly shows that

He didn't, it wasn't, and it doesn't.

~~~~~~
"But a purely dispassionate examination of the facts indicates that Chauvin only attempted to restrain Floyd, who was under the influence of controlled substances and was struggling with police. Indeed, audio evidence, the recording of the conversations from the officers’ body cams, indicate that Chauvin only wanted to keep Floyd where he was until an ambulance arrived."
"Couple Chauvin’s stated intent with the fact that the immobilization technique Chauvin used was taught to Minneapolis officers (despite the claims of the mayor, the governor of Minnesota, and even the police chief who apparently is unaware - or does not want to admit- what his officers are trained to do). Then add that this technique has been used by mental health workers and others to restrain people who are violent. Also add that a similar technique was used four years earlier against a White man in Dallas, who was also under the influence of drugs and also died, and it will be damn near impossible to establish that Chauvin intended bodily harm. Indeed, it may be difficult to prove any crime."

If he didn't commit....You must acquit.......................................I'm going to sell t shirts on the street

 

[San Souci]

So George Floyd was NOT Intentionally Murdered by a Racist White Cop?​

So George Floyd was NOT Intentionally Murdered by a Racist White Cop? (houstoncourant.com)
15 Mar 2021 ~~ By Michael P. Tremoglie



So far, the most interesting aspect of the trial of police officer Derek Chauvin are the crimes for which he has not been charged. Chauvin has been vilified for his role in the arrest-related-death of a man resisting arrest.
Despite almost a year of riots, ranting and raving by cable news, and even condemnations by supposedly law-and-order radio talk show hosts, Former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin is not being charged with the intentional murder of George Floyd. Chauvin is not even being charged with a hate crime. So one may be forgiven for being bewildered. After all, there were riots all over the United States, all over the world, about this innocent Black man allegedly being mercilessly killed by a White racist police officer. After all, the Attorney General of Minnesota is Keith Ellison, the first African-American Minnesota attorney general and the first Muslim Minnesota Attorney General.
How could this be?
So this is the dilemma for Derek Chauvin. He must prove his innocence - as opposed to the prosecution proving his guilt. There is no presumption of innocence for Derek Chauvin. His only chance for a fair trial is for him to have a jury of his peers and a trial judge who, unlike Amy Coney Barrett or Bill Barr, are not cowards. He needs an intrepid judge and jury. He needs a judge and jury who will stand firm against the Leftist Lynch Mob.
Tragically, for Derek Chauvin, for American justice, and for law abiding Americans intrepid judges and jurors do not seem likely.


Comment:
How many people have lost their lively hoods, businesses and yes their lives over this false narrative? Should we hold the Quisling Media liable? BLM? Antifa and the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Left politicians? They have destroyed lives and jobs by lying to the public.
In order to convict Chauvin, they need to charge him with something they can prove. Guessing they have investigated it and have the total truth.
Can Chauvin find an impartial judge and jury in the twin cities of Minneapolis/St. Paul? I doubt it and so does his Defense team of attorneys.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/03/15/derek-chauvin-george-floyd-trial/

**********​

Chauvin defense team asks for change of venue after George Floyd family settlement announcement

Ultimately the Marxist Left must convict him of something, anything, to pacify the racists they've created toavoid more riots.
The cop did what he was trained to do, what it was his duty to do, the evidence plainly shows that, but the Leftists are ready to launch (staged and paid?) angry mobs if the outcome of the trial is not to their liking.

Not guilty. And if they RIOT ,throw every goddam one of them in JAIL. Prison is an equal Opportunity Employer,

 

[Doc7505]

So George Floyd was NOT Intentionally Murdered by a Racist White Cop?​

So George Floyd was NOT Intentionally Murdered by a Racist White Cop? (houstoncourant.com)
15 Mar 2021 ~~ By Michael P. Tremoglie



So far, the most interesting aspect of the trial of police officer Derek Chauvin are the crimes for which he has not been charged. Chauvin has been vilified for his role in the arrest-related-death of a man resisting arrest.
Despite almost a year of riots, ranting and raving by cable news, and even condemnations by supposedly law-and-order radio talk show hosts, Former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin is not being charged with the intentional murder of George Floyd. Chauvin is not even being charged with a hate crime. So one may be forgiven for being bewildered. After all, there were riots all over the United States, all over the world, about this innocent Black man allegedly being mercilessly killed by a White racist police officer. After all, the Attorney General of Minnesota is Keith Ellison, the first African-American Minnesota attorney general and the first Muslim Minnesota Attorney General.
How could this be?
So this is the dilemma for Derek Chauvin. He must prove his innocence - as opposed to the prosecution proving his guilt. There is no presumption of innocence for Derek Chauvin. His only chance for a fair trial is for him to have a jury of his peers and a trial judge who, unlike Amy Coney Barrett or Bill Barr, are not cowards. He needs an intrepid judge and jury. He needs a judge and jury who will stand firm against the Leftist Lynch Mob.
Tragically, for Derek Chauvin, for American justice, and for law abiding Americans intrepid judges and jurors do not seem likely.


Comment:
How many people have lost their lively hoods, businesses and yes their lives over this false narrative? Should we hold the Quisling Media liable? BLM? Antifa and the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Left politicians? They have destroyed lives and jobs by lying to the public.
In order to convict Chauvin, they need to charge him with something they can prove. Guessing they have investigated it and have the total truth.
Can Chauvin find an impartial judge and jury in the twin cities of Minneapolis/St. Paul? I doubt it and so does his Defense team of attorneys.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/03/15/derek-chauvin-george-floyd-trial/

**********​

Chauvin defense team asks for change of venue after George Floyd family settlement announcement

Ultimately the Marxist Left must convict him of something, anything, to pacify the racists they've created toavoid more riots.
The cop did what he was trained to do, what it was his duty to do, the evidence plainly shows that, but the Leftists are ready to launch (staged and paid?) angry mobs if the outcome of the trial is not to their liking.

Not guilty. And if they RIOT ,throw every goddam one of them in JAIL. Prison is an equal Opportunity Employer,

And shoot the looters.....

 

[AFrench2]

Its the officers duty to crush a guy's neck for 10 minutes? Oh, okay.

Shut the fuck up.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I don't think killing him was intentional.

 

[San Souci]

Its the officers duty to crush a guy's neck for 10 minutes? Oh, okay.

Shut the fuck up.

Yes. If it is a dirty Thug Junkie. That fuck had a record a mile long. Good riddance. Boom Boom Boom-Another one bites the Dust!

 

[eyesmile]

I don't think killing him was intentional.

I agree, but it was certainly an unnecessary and idiotic use of restraint when the struggle was over. Even one of the rookies ventured in to suggest rolling him on his side and got a 'got this' dismissive response.

But the leaked body cam footage of the whole incident is not surprisingly censored by US media who love to edit and or stir up conflicts, rage and ratings even at the expense of real people's lives.

https://videos.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2020/08/11/2965184223672746858/480x270_MP4_2965184223672746858.mp4

 

[Doc7505]

​

The cop did what he was trained to do, what it was his duty to do, the evidence plainly shows that

He didn't, it wasn't, and it doesn't.

~~~~~~
We'll see what the trial proceeding and the Defense proves.....

 

[Doc7505]

I don't think killing him was intentional.

I agree, but it was certainly an unnecessary and idiotic use of restraint when the struggle was over. Even one of the rookies ventured in to suggest rolling him on his side and got a 'got this' dismissive response.

But the leaked body cam footage of the whole incident is not surprisingly censored by US media who love to edit and or stir up conflicts, rage and ratings even at the expense of real people's lives.

https://videos.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2020/08/11/2965184223672746858/480x270_MP4_2965184223672746858.mp4

~~~~~~
Isn't it strangely odd that the Quisling American media did not show the video even though they had it...? It took the Daily Mail U.K. to air the truth.

Minneapolis PD Trained Officers to Use the Neck Restraint That Killed George Floyd: Docs

“The training material supports that neck restraint was something taught to officers,” court documents filed Wednesday stated.

www.thedailybeast.com

​

 

[Doc7505]

I don't think killing him was intentional.

Chauvin didn't Kill George Floyd... George Floyd killed himself by swallowing Fentanyl in his possession to avoid being arrested holding drugs.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I don't think killing him was intentional.

Chauvin didn't Kill George Floyd... George Floyd killed himself by swallowing Fentanyl in his possession to avoid being arrested holding drugs.

Not what the medical experts claim.

 

[Turtlesoup]

​

The cop did what he was trained to do, what it was his duty to do, the evidence plainly shows that

He didn't, it wasn't, and it doesn't.

Actually, they have already showed that it was what he and thousands of other cops were trained to do
It was certainly his duty to remove criminals from the street
and yes the evidence clearly shows this---but so many are to racist, to partisan, and to stupid to accept these facts.

Criminals have to be arrested--sometimes they die when being arrested from various causes---in Floyds case--he overdosed on DRugs but the libs attacked the poor the cop for doing more than making the streets safer.

 

[harmonica]

Its the officers duty to crush a guy's neck for 10 minutes? Oh, okay.

Shut the fuck up.

you STFU--he did not mean to kill him....nowhere close.....he was trying to restrain him
you CAN'T PROVE otherwise

 

[Claudette]

Wasn't he high of fentanal?? That what I read. That drug is deadly.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

​

The cop did what he was trained to do, what it was his duty to do, the evidence plainly shows that

He didn't, it wasn't, and it doesn't.

~~~~~~
"But a purely dispassionate examination of the facts indicates that Chauvin only attempted to restrain Floyd, who was under the influence of controlled substances and was struggling with police. Indeed, audio evidence, the recording of the conversations from the officers’ body cams, indicate that Chauvin only wanted to keep Floyd where he was until an ambulance arrived."
"Couple Chauvin’s stated intent with the fact that the immobilization technique Chauvin used was taught to Minneapolis officers (despite the claims of the mayor, the governor of Minnesota, and even the police chief who apparently is unaware - or does not want to admit- what his officers are trained to do). Then add that this technique has been used by mental health workers and others to restrain people who are violent. Also add that a similar technique was used four years earlier against a White man in Dallas, who was also under the influence of drugs and also died, and it will be damn near impossible to establish that Chauvin intended bodily harm. Indeed, it may be difficult to prove any crime."

I never said he killed him on purpose. I simply responded to what you claimed.

 

[colfax_m]

Wasn't he high of fentanal?? That what I read. That drug is deadly.

It’s a lot deadlier when someone is putting their weight on your chest impairing your ability to breath.