Similarities Between NAZI Party and 2020 Democrats is Uncanny!

[westwall]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

That's all completely bass-ackwards.

Just to start with everyone knows the Nazis were not socialist.

National SOCIALIST Workers Party.

Dumbass

 

[bottlecap]

Refugees from SOCIALIST countries give warning to many clueless Americans who do understand what awaits us all, if SOCIALISTS take control of out government.

Refugees from socialist countries warn Americans: Don't let it happen here

Immigrants who settled in the U.S. say recent political shifts here are starting to remind them of what they left behind.

www.foxnews.com

"Immigrants who settled in the U.S. say recent political shifts here are starting to remind them of what they left behind"

 

[Tax Man]

As the Reich owns the media the news is and has been unamerican for 20 or more years. They produce anti democratic fear and loathing. As for Adolfs Germany it was fascist and socialist in Name only.

 

[bottlecap]

The NAZIS blamed the Jews in the 1930's

Today the Democrats blame Whites.

Ironically, the old saying, "The more things change, the more they stay the same.

 

[westwall]

As the Reich owns the media the news is and has been unamerican for 20 or more years. They produce anti democratic fear and loathing. As for Adolfs Germany it was fascist and socialist in Name only.

Bullshit. The Nazi's controlled the production in the factories. That is the essence of socialism. You need to study more.

 

[bottlecap]

As the Reich owns the media the news is and has been unamerican for 20 or more years. They produce anti democratic fear and loathing. As for Adolfs Germany it was fascist and socialist in Name only.

We are in Agreement on a major point!! The Main-Stream Media is "un-American"

But they are certainly not "anti-democratic" if you mean the democratic party, as the overwhelming number of news outlets favor the empty suit, Joe Biden, over President TRUMP.

Also, another Socialist Country with a violent history, the USSR... Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics.

 

[Tax Man]

The NAZIS blamed the Jews in the 1930's

Today the Democrats blame Whites.

Ironically, the old saying, "The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Adolf scapegoated the iews just like the repukes scapegoat the dems.

 

[Crepitus]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

That's all completely bass-ackwards.

Just to start with everyone knows the Nazis were not socialist.

National SOCIALIST Workers Party.

Dumbass

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

Think man.

 

[bottlecap]

The NAZIS blamed the Jews in the 1930's

Today the Democrats blame Whites.

Ironically, the old saying, "The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Adolf scapegoated the iews just like the repukes scapegoat the dems.View attachment 389490

One political party clashing with another over policies is what politics was all about.

But the democrats hate White and Jewish people because of their race, no other reason.

The democrats used to hate Black people because they were Black, so identity politics is nothing new to them.

 

[westwall]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

That's all completely bass-ackwards.

Just to start with everyone knows the Nazis were not socialist.

National SOCIALIST Workers Party.

Dumbass

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

Think man.

I do, you don't. "Peoples" in the name is automatically socialist. Just like when SOCIALIST is in the name it is automatically SOCIALIST.

Think man!

 

[jackflash]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

You are correct. There is but one "Individual Liberty"(concept). There are hundreds of statist left sects from jjjjumpin jjjjihadists to Big Daddy Idi Amins genocidal gurus. No matter what its title/name; KKK, Black Panthers, national socialism, BLM, fascism, brown shirts, red star activists, pol pot communalists, antifa, black shirts, etc they ALL support both totalitarianism/violence, as well as bigotry & racial discrimination, as they are all one in the religion of the statist left global cult(one world religion).

 

[Viktor]

Exactly.. only they are packaged differently.

OK. Antifa has already killed several innocent people. Let's take them to Nuremberg and try them for war crimes. If they are found guilty, we can hang them.

 

[Moonglow]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

How many Repubs were quashed during the election-none..

 

[Moonglow]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

You are correct. There is but one "Individual Liberty"(concept). There are hundreds of statist left sects from jjjjumpin jjjjihadists to Big Daddy Idi Amins genocidal gurus. No matter what its title/name; KKK, Black Panthers, national socialism, BLM, fascism, brown shirts, red star activists, pol pot communalists, antifa, black shirts, etc they ALL support both totalitarianism/violence, as well as bigotry & racial discrimination, as they are all one in the religion of the statist left global cult(one world religion).

What a hell of a stretch trying to roll all of those into just one representation....

 

[Moonglow]

This thread is a perfect example of people whom are totally ignorant of political science and the associations of political ideology.

 

[surada]

Just to start with everyone knows the Nazis were not socialist.

NAtionalsoZIalistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
= National Socialist German Workers' Party in English.

Socialist as they come: sozialistische with a sneering emphasis on the "zi."

Hitler split from the socialists in 1926.. He purged communists, socialists, democrats and Jews in 1933. See the Enabling Act of 1933.

 

[surada]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

There are far more similarities than you mentioned. Both the 1930's Nazis and the modern Democrat Party used violence as a tactic to silence opposition, they both sought to deprive their opposition of their basic human rights, they both used a fake victim tactic of repeating a false narrative of being victims of the opposing parties, they both practiced historical denialism and revisionism, they both used the justice system to stay in power, they both used abortion and eugenics to rid the country of undesirable racial elements.

They both used the media and movies to dehumanize their enemies (Jews, conservatives), they both were anti-Semitic, they were both warmongers, They both wanted socialized health care and put doctors on low salaries, they both created a shitload of government jobs, they both indoctrinated the youth with their agenda and beliefs, they were both staunch advocates of gun control, they were both shameless exponents of identity politics.

They were both propnents of nationalization of business, forced profit sharing, outlawing all profits during wartime, abolition of all income not earned directly from work (via high capital gains/inheritance taxes). They both believed the state should provide a "livelihood for its citizens", old age insurance funded by government, price caps, price controls, rent controls, laws against speculation,"communal" rent free living areas, an end to the "materialistic" world order, free higher education focusing on "civic affairs", humanities, and political science. They both used censorship against news media that don't tow the line, believed in the "common good" and "common interest" before individual interest, and a strong central government to make these goals come true, mainly through economic coercion and force.

Adolf Hitler said it himself in a speech he made in 1927:

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."

Yes, I forgot a key element of ALL Socialists, which is to promise FREE STUFF. As to censorship, that has been in place for a VERY Long Time and the Democrats have added the physical threat thru ANTIFA and BLM.

Hitler didn't nationalize any companies.

 

[JGalt]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

There are far more similarities than you mentioned. Both the 1930's Nazis and the modern Democrat Party used violence as a tactic to silence opposition, they both sought to deprive their opposition of their basic human rights, they both used a fake victim tactic of repeating a false narrative of being victims of the opposing parties, they both practiced historical denialism and revisionism, they both used the justice system to stay in power, they both used abortion and eugenics to rid the country of undesirable racial elements.

They both used the media and movies to dehumanize their enemies (Jews, conservatives), they both were anti-Semitic, they were both warmongers, They both wanted socialized health care and put doctors on low salaries, they both created a shitload of government jobs, they both indoctrinated the youth with their agenda and beliefs, they were both staunch advocates of gun control, they were both shameless exponents of identity politics.

They were both propnents of nationalization of business, forced profit sharing, outlawing all profits during wartime, abolition of all income not earned directly from work (via high capital gains/inheritance taxes). They both believed the state should provide a "livelihood for its citizens", old age insurance funded by government, price caps, price controls, rent controls, laws against speculation,"communal" rent free living areas, an end to the "materialistic" world order, free higher education focusing on "civic affairs", humanities, and political science. They both used censorship against news media that don't tow the line, believed in the "common good" and "common interest" before individual interest, and a strong central government to make these goals come true, mainly through economic coercion and force.

Adolf Hitler said it himself in a speech he made in 1927:

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."

Yes, I forgot a key element of ALL Socialists, which is to promise FREE STUFF. As to censorship, that has been in place for a VERY Long Time and the Democrats have added the physical threat thru ANTIFA and BLM.

Hitler didn't nationalize any companies.

Wikipedia disagrees with you...

"Nationalization under Nazi Germany was substantial. Over 500 major companies were either nationalized or absorbed by state-owned companies, one of the largest being the Hermann Göring Works (iron), mostly operated by the Nazi Party apparatus.[9]"

List of nationalizations by country - Wikipedia

 

[surada]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

There are far more similarities than you mentioned. Both the 1930's Nazis and the modern Democrat Party used violence as a tactic to silence opposition, they both sought to deprive their opposition of their basic human rights, they both used a fake victim tactic of repeating a false narrative of being victims of the opposing parties, they both practiced historical denialism and revisionism, they both used the justice system to stay in power, they both used abortion and eugenics to rid the country of undesirable racial elements.

They both used the media and movies to dehumanize their enemies (Jews, conservatives), they both were anti-Semitic, they were both warmongers, They both wanted socialized health care and put doctors on low salaries, they both created a shitload of government jobs, they both indoctrinated the youth with their agenda and beliefs, they were both staunch advocates of gun control, they were both shameless exponents of identity politics.

They were both propnents of nationalization of business, forced profit sharing, outlawing all profits during wartime, abolition of all income not earned directly from work (via high capital gains/inheritance taxes). They both believed the state should provide a "livelihood for its citizens", old age insurance funded by government, price caps, price controls, rent controls, laws against speculation,"communal" rent free living areas, an end to the "materialistic" world order, free higher education focusing on "civic affairs", humanities, and political science. They both used censorship against news media that don't tow the line, believed in the "common good" and "common interest" before individual interest, and a strong central government to make these goals come true, mainly through economic coercion and force.

Adolf Hitler said it himself in a speech he made in 1927:

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."

Yes, I forgot a key element of ALL Socialists, which is to promise FREE STUFF. As to censorship, that has been in place for a VERY Long Time and the Democrats have added the physical threat thru ANTIFA and BLM.

Hitler didn't nationalize any companies.

Wikipedia disagrees with you...

"Nationalization under Nazi Germany was substantial. Over 500 major companies were either nationalized or absorbed by state-owned companies, one of the largest being the Hermann Göring Works (iron), mostly operated by the Nazi Party apparatus.[9]"

List of nationalizations by country - Wikipedia

The article has some problems. For instance the "nationalization of ARAMCO was written into the oil concession in the 1930's for a 50 year period and the transition, while seamless, took place over many years.

 

[AMart]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

The primary difference is that NAZIs were for a Germany for Germans, and some leg room relative to colonizing others. Where leftists today are much more open borders flood the country with migrants.