- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,822
- 350
The left still likes to pretend that all muslims are peaceful, reasonable people. Here are the "moderates" living in America. They want sharia law and to have their own courts. For now, our laws currently stop them from creating their own system of laws and justice that would trump ours, so they say their verdicts are voluntarily accepted. No mention of what happens to people in their communities who reject sharia law decisions in favor of the American system, which actually supports individual rights.
If we start allowing no-go zones and letting them have their own courts, how much longer before their religious "rights" are upheld in our courts to the point where they are allowed to have their own government? Islam is more of a dictatorship type government than a religion. They force rules on people and force them to believe in their god or face dire consequences.
In N.J., a judge allowed sharia law to overrule our own laws when he refused to hold a man responsible for abuse of his wife. The reasoning was that it's just the way muslims are and we can't hold them to our standards when they know nothing but their own archaic laws. The man considered it normal to abuse his wife since his religious book says it's okay. The woman was not granted a restraining order against the guy because he didn't understand what he did wrong. That pretty much guarantees he'll do it again and the woman remains in danger. He is doing what muslims do and that it mistreat women as they see fit. After all, that's what is says in their book, so no one can hold them liable for abuse. This is getting sick. If this judge is right and it's true that muslim men have no clue what they are doing wrong when they abuse women, then why do we want them here? How about we let them know that they can't break laws here, regardless of what their religious rag says? Maybe they'd think twice about coming if they knew they couldn't come and change things to suit themselves. That is why they come. Many have come out and admitted that their ultimate goal is a world controlled by sharia law.
" While some critics might be mollified by these "judges" claims that their "rulings" are "voluntary" now, how long will it be before this group or others like it start fighting to force American courts to acknowledge Sharia law in our own justice system?
Not as far off as you might think.
For example, a New Jersey judge recently cited Sharia Law in refusing to grant a Muslim woman a restraining order in a horrible case of sexual assault and abuse:
A New Jersey family court judge’s decision not to grant a restraining order to a woman who was sexually abused by her Moroccan husband and forced repeatedly to have sex with him is sounding the alarm for advocates of laws designed to ban Shariah in America.
Judge Joseph Charles, in denying the restraining order to the woman after her divorce, ruled that her ex-husband felt he had behaved according to his Muslim beliefs — and that he did not have "criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault" his wife.
Chilling. An American judge rubber-stamping the horrible abuse of a woman — in America — because her husband acted within the bounds of the barbaric, anti-woman Muslim "holy book." "
http://toprightnews.com/?p=8134
If we start allowing no-go zones and letting them have their own courts, how much longer before their religious "rights" are upheld in our courts to the point where they are allowed to have their own government? Islam is more of a dictatorship type government than a religion. They force rules on people and force them to believe in their god or face dire consequences.
In N.J., a judge allowed sharia law to overrule our own laws when he refused to hold a man responsible for abuse of his wife. The reasoning was that it's just the way muslims are and we can't hold them to our standards when they know nothing but their own archaic laws. The man considered it normal to abuse his wife since his religious book says it's okay. The woman was not granted a restraining order against the guy because he didn't understand what he did wrong. That pretty much guarantees he'll do it again and the woman remains in danger. He is doing what muslims do and that it mistreat women as they see fit. After all, that's what is says in their book, so no one can hold them liable for abuse. This is getting sick. If this judge is right and it's true that muslim men have no clue what they are doing wrong when they abuse women, then why do we want them here? How about we let them know that they can't break laws here, regardless of what their religious rag says? Maybe they'd think twice about coming if they knew they couldn't come and change things to suit themselves. That is why they come. Many have come out and admitted that their ultimate goal is a world controlled by sharia law.
" While some critics might be mollified by these "judges" claims that their "rulings" are "voluntary" now, how long will it be before this group or others like it start fighting to force American courts to acknowledge Sharia law in our own justice system?
Not as far off as you might think.
For example, a New Jersey judge recently cited Sharia Law in refusing to grant a Muslim woman a restraining order in a horrible case of sexual assault and abuse:
A New Jersey family court judge’s decision not to grant a restraining order to a woman who was sexually abused by her Moroccan husband and forced repeatedly to have sex with him is sounding the alarm for advocates of laws designed to ban Shariah in America.
Judge Joseph Charles, in denying the restraining order to the woman after her divorce, ruled that her ex-husband felt he had behaved according to his Muslim beliefs — and that he did not have "criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault" his wife.
Chilling. An American judge rubber-stamping the horrible abuse of a woman — in America — because her husband acted within the bounds of the barbaric, anti-woman Muslim "holy book." "
http://toprightnews.com/?p=8134
