75th Anniversary

And if Japan had not ATTACKED AMERICA, guess what.....they wouldn't have had to go through it at all.

Pearl Harbor, After Japan attacks America. Thousands of Americans perish

images


uss-oklahoma-sunk.jpg


17-pearl-harbor-photo-gallery-getty-615315808.jpg

We CAN talk about it SINCE the lack of reaction of the American military authorities to the numerous warnings about the forthcoming Japanese attack at that time is COMPLETELY SIMILAR to THE LACK OF RESPONSE of the administration of the reincarnated alcoholic Bush Jr. to warnings by CIA and Mossad field officers about the presence in the country of a group of young Arabs who were trained to drive wide-body Boeing, but who systematically missed landing classes.

And what were ordinary Japanese people to blame for - men, women, old people ... children??? You SO love to talk about them!


I am READY for THIS discussion.


Are you under the delusion they would have been spared given the conventional bombing technology of the time. You only need look at the carpet bombing that took place in Europe to find the answer, it would be a resounding NO.

.
 
...

The Nanking massacre alone. They could have surrendered ...

There were feelers out looking for a chance to negotiate a surrender, even before Okinawa. fdr had no interest in peace before testing his new toy. The lapdog truman filled out his master's final wish by incinerating hundreds of thousands of women, children, and the elderly.

Thank you for your honesty, knowledge, and humanity.
 
I'm not defending it nor condemning it but we have to understand the fact that the world went crazy during WW2. The accepted way to defeat the enemy was to keep killing civilians until the leadership surrendered.
 
WARNING This post contains graphic images that may be disturbing to viewers. Viewer discretion is advised



Sixteen hours after the bombing, the White House released a statement by President Harry S. Truman, who was en route from the Potsdam Conference aboard the U.S.S. Augusta. "It is an atomic bomb," Truman announced, "harnessing . . . the basic power of the universe. The force from which the sun draws its power has been loosed against those who brought war to the Far East."



The immediate public response to news of the Manhattan Project and the atomic bombings of Japan, as filtered through the project's public relations efforts, was overwhelmingly favorable. When asked simply "do you approve of the use of the atomic bomb?", 85 percent of Americans in one August 1945 poll replied "yes." Few doubted that the atomic bomb had ended the war and saved American lives, and after almost four years of war, few retained much sympathy for Japan. The writer Paul Fussell, who as a 21-year-old second lieutenant was slated to be part of the invasion force going into Japan, perhaps has put it most succinctly:

When the bombs dropped and news began to circulate that [the invasion] would not, after all, take place, that we would not be obliged to run up the beaches near Tokyo assault-firing while being mortared and shelled, for all the fake manliness of our facades we cried with relief and joy. We were going to live. We were going to grow up to adulthood after all.
A certain sense of remorse also slowly began to build among the public, especially as details became known of the destruction at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. An important early step in this process was when the entire August 21, 1946, issue of The New Yorker magazine was devoted to stories of the devastation of Hiroshima. (These articles were later reprinted as a book: John Hersey's Hiroshima.)

View attachment 372029

View attachment 372031

View attachment 372032

View attachment 372033

View attachment 372034

View attachment 372035
View attachment 372036

View attachment 372039




Hmmmm....you could ask the Chinese civilians raped, tortured, butchered during the Rape of Nanking how they felt about ending the war with the atomic bombs.....but the Japanese raped, tortured and murdered them...............
 
WARNING This post contains graphic images that may be disturbing to viewers. Viewer discretion is advised



Sixteen hours after the bombing, the White House released a statement by President Harry S. Truman, who was en route from the Potsdam Conference aboard the U.S.S. Augusta. "It is an atomic bomb," Truman announced, "harnessing . . . the basic power of the universe. The force from which the sun draws its power has been loosed against those who brought war to the Far East."



The immediate public response to news of the Manhattan Project and the atomic bombings of Japan, as filtered through the project's public relations efforts, was overwhelmingly favorable. When asked simply "do you approve of the use of the atomic bomb?", 85 percent of Americans in one August 1945 poll replied "yes." Few doubted that the atomic bomb had ended the war and saved American lives, and after almost four years of war, few retained much sympathy for Japan. The writer Paul Fussell, who as a 21-year-old second lieutenant was slated to be part of the invasion force going into Japan, perhaps has put it most succinctly:

When the bombs dropped and news began to circulate that [the invasion] would not, after all, take place, that we would not be obliged to run up the beaches near Tokyo assault-firing while being mortared and shelled, for all the fake manliness of our facades we cried with relief and joy. We were going to live. We were going to grow up to adulthood after all.
A certain sense of remorse also slowly began to build among the public, especially as details became known of the destruction at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. An important early step in this process was when the entire August 21, 1946, issue of The New Yorker magazine was devoted to stories of the devastation of Hiroshima. (These articles were later reprinted as a book: John Hersey's Hiroshima.)

View attachment 372029

View attachment 372031

View attachment 372032

View attachment 372033

View attachment 372034

View attachment 372035
View attachment 372036

View attachment 372039


Only 100 thousand? It wasn't nearly enough for what those bastards did. Not just to us but to all of Asia too.
 
...

The Nanking massacre alone. They could have surrendered ...

There were feelers out looking for a chance to negotiate a surrender, even before Okinawa. fdr had no interest in peace before testing his new toy. The lapdog truman filled out his master's final wish by incinerating hundreds of thousands of women, children, and the elderly.
How many thousands of women, children and elderly did the Japs murder during the war?

Battlefield as Crime Scene: The Japanese Massacre in Manila
A mother and child are among the victims of widespread butchery. Civilian dead totaled around 100,000—many tortured and murdered. (National Archives)

Seems that you are okay with Japs murdering people, but we stop those murderers and you hate US.

Oh and by the way, there were no innocent Japs, in Japan, they were all training to repel a US invasion of the Japan homeland which could of exterminated all Japanese. So Democrat Truman did the Japs a favor and saved more lives than he killed...
 
anybody ever read a book called The Bataan Death March? The Japanese were a brutal Force to be recokened with. They were offered a chance to end the war and refused so as you know it took a second bomb to get their submission and you better believe if Japan had those bombs they would have happily dropped them on us!
 
...

The Nanking massacre alone. They could have surrendered ...

There were feelers out looking for a chance to negotiate a surrender, even before Okinawa. fdr had no interest in peace before testing his new toy. The lapdog truman filled out his master's final wish by incinerating hundreds of thousands of women, children, and the elderly.


That's a lie.....They wanted to end the war with their power intact.....that wasn't going to happen.
 
If you don't think democrats hate America and Americans and want to punish them, threads like this should convince you.

Democrats believe America is evil and must be fundamentally transformed/destroyed.
 
If you don't think democrats hate America and Americans and want to punish them, threads like this should convince you.

Democrats believe America is evil and must be fundamentally transformed/destroyed.

OK.

But tomorrow they might not.

It depends on what George Soros tells Nancy Pelosi to tell them to believe and for how many hours or days.
 
If you don't think democrats hate America and Americans and want to punish them, threads like this should convince you.

Democrats believe America is evil and must be fundamentally transformed/destroyed.

OK.

But tomorrow they might not.

It depends on what George Soros tells Nancy Pelosi to tell them to believe and for how many hours or days.
Democrats are run by a nazi collaborator. Says all you need to know about them and what they want for America.
 
Originally posted by Theowl32
Yeah the Japanese reaped what they sowed.

And so did America.

430113


maxresdefault.jpg
Spot on! Muslims were so peaceful before that. We had to crush them in a world war to make them that peaceful. Which really wasn't all that peaceful, as you can see if you read about radical islam in the 1930s.
 
Originally posted by Theowl32
Yeah the Japanese reaped what they sowed.

And so did America.

430113


maxresdefault.jpg
Spot on! Muslims were so peaceful before that. We had to crush them in a world war to make them that peaceful. Which really wasn't all that peaceful, as you can see if you read about radical islam in the 1930s.
The one thing Democrats hate more then white people is Jews.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top