Sen. Marco Rubio says Rep. Ilhan Omar ‘out of her mind’ for anti-Israel tweet

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is NOT a peninsula, and the area is normally known as The Land Of Canaan, it is not known as Israel, Judea, or Samaria.
The natives are Canaanite, Philistine, Chaldean, Amorite, Phoenician, Urite, Nabatian, etc., but not Jews.
Jews did not invade until around 900 BC, an were kicked out by 650 BC, by the Babylonians.
Jews were never a majority or the legal owners.
Who was the founder of Canaan prior to the Canaanite invasion?
I bet you don’t know.
 
The history is the British promised the Palestinians independence if they helped defeat the Ottoman Empire.
The Arabs did their part under Lawrence of Arabia.
The British declared an independent Palestine in the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres.
The Balfour Declaration also rewarded Jews for their espionage against the Germans in WWI, but definitely did not plan to grand an independent Jewish state.
Jews were only granted facilitated emigration to an Arab Palestine.


{...
Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

So it is not only an illegal violation of treaty to even create an Israel at all, but it show massive duplicity and fraud on the part of the Zionists, who emigrated there under fall pretense, illegally smuggling in arms they used against unarmed and defenseless Palestinians. Like the Massacre of Dier Yassin.

The Brits split Palestine into an Arab state (Jordan) and the mandate that was destined to be the a Jewish state of Israel. In 1948 the Arabs decided they didn’t like the deal and invaded The new state of Israel with the avowed intent of eradicating the Jews. For some reason, the Jews objected and fought back until eventually the UN froze the positions of the invading armies and Jewish defenders thus setting the defacto borders of Israel until the Arabs decided to try killing all the Jews again in 1967. It ended badly as has every subsequent Arab invasion since.
 
The Brits split Palestine into an Arab state (Jordan) and the mandate that was destined to be the a Jewish state of Israel. In 1948 the Arabs decided they didn’t like the deal and invaded The new state of Israel with the avowed intent of eradicating the Jews. For some reason, the Jews objected and fought back until eventually the UN froze the positions of the invading armies and Jewish defenders thus setting the defacto borders of Israel until the Arabs decided to try killing all the Jews again in 1967. It ended badly as has every subsequent Arab invasion since.
We all know Rigby has an Arab partner.
 
True. But the morality of this action would be a little more murky if before those rockets were fired, the US military was occupying Juarez and evicting Mexicans so that Americans could build new housing developments.
According to many Mexicans, the Americans are illegally occupying Texas, Arizona, New Mexico and California. That would be their justification for attacking America. Gee, sounds a lot like what the Arabs say about Israel.
 
Wrong.
Almost always less than a 20th of the population, until the 1930 immigration.
{...
The columns represent: Year, Jews, Christians, Moslems, total
End 12th c.MinorityMinorityMajority>225
14th c.MinorityMinorityMajority150
1533–153956145157
1690–1691211219232
1800722246275
18904357432532
19149470525689
19228471589752
1931175897601,033
19476301431,1811,970

...}
Numbers represent thousands.
No matter how you cut it the numbers were always a hell of a lot more than insignificant or virtually zero which is what you have claimed. '

They always had a SIGNIFICANT presence.
 
Well since there only ARE 12 Jewish tribes traditionally, then I would say they were ALL in Saudi Arabia around 650 AD.
Sure there likely were SOME Jews already living there, or else the Jerusalem refugees would not have known about it and gone there.
But that is where most of the Jews who left Jerusalem went.
Since not many stayed in Saudi Arabia, most of them eventually went to Iran.
Your history is very screwed up-----your Imam pig lied again. What sort of pig is he-----shiite or sunni?. It was the Iraqi jews who fled the filth of islamic invasion to Iran and also to Bombay actually circa 650 AD during the time that the islamic dogs of arabia were doing their rape, pillage and murder jihads for allah.
 
Wrong.
The blockade of Jerusalem was during the 1948 war when the Jews in Jerusalem illegally tried to make Jerusalem part of Israel.
It was an act of war, and they were lucky they were not shot for their treason, instead of just being made to leave.

The "Hebron Massacre" was deliberately provoked and started by Zionists.

{...
The city of Hebron holds special significance in Judaism and Islam, it being the site of the Tomb of the Patriarchs. In 1929, the population of the city numbered around 20,000, the majority of whom were Muslim Arabs. A small community of around 700 Jews lived in and around Hebron.

A few dozen Jews lived deep within Hebron, in a kind of ghetto, where there were several synagogues[15] and the Hebron Yeshiva,[16][17] but the majority rented houses from Arab proprietors on the outskirts.[18][19] The Jewish community was divided between relatively recent European (Ashkenazi)[16] immigrants and an older population of descendants of Sephardic Jews who had inhabited the town for centuries. Ashkenazi Jews had been established in the town for at least a century.[20] The two communities, Sephardic and Ashkenazi, maintained separate schools, worshipped in separate synagogues, and did not intermarry. The Sephardics were Arabic speakers, wore Arab dress and were well integrated, whereas many of the Ashkenazi community were yeshiva students who maintained 'foreign' ways, and had difficulties and misunderstandings with the Arab population.[21] The tensions between the two Jewish communities, both very traditionalist, were not caused by diverging worldviews, but only by differences of culture and ritual practice. The progressive trends of the new Western arrivals in Palestine, represented by both foreign powers and modernising Jewish philantropists and organisations, were a different matter altogether.[22] Since the Balfour Declaration of 1917, tensions had been growing between the Arab and Jewish communities in Palestine.[23] The Muslim community of Hebron had a reputation for being highly conservative in religion. Though Jews had suffered numerous vexations in the past, and this hostility was to take an anti-Zionist turn after the Balfour Declaration,[24] a peaceful relationship existed between both communities.[25] During the riots of 1920 and 1921, Hebron's Jews had been spared the violence that broke out elsewhere.[26]

In mid-August 1929, hundreds of Jewish nationalists marched to the Western Wall in Jerusalem shouting slogans such as "The Wall is Ours" and raising the Jewish national flag.[20] Rumours spread that Jewish youths had also attacked Arabs and had cursed Muhammad.[27][28] Following an inflammatory sermon the next day, hundreds of Muslims converged on the Western Wall, burning prayer books and injuring the beadle. The rioting soon spread to the Jewish commercial area of town[29][30] and the next day, August 17, a young Jew was stabbed to death.[31] The authorities failed to quell the violence. On Friday, August 23, inflamed by rumors that Jews were planning to attack al-Aqsa Mosque, Arabs started to attack Jews in the Old City of Jerusalem. The first murders of the day took place when two or three Arabs passing by the Jewish Quarter of Mea Shearim were killed.[32] Rumours that Jews had massacred Arabs in Jerusalem then reached Hebron by that evening.[18] Hillel Cohen frames his recent narrative of the incident in terms of the murder of the Jaffa Awan family by a Jewish police constable called Simcha Hinkis.[33]
...}

With 700 Jews and 20,000 Moslems, clearly the Jews were being defended by Moslems.
The conflict was obviously deliberately started by Zionists.
The first deaths were Moslem.
In the Hebron islamic POGROM of 1929 there were
no muslim deaths at all------the islamic dogs attacked
an utterly unarmed population of jews for the glory of allah.
Children lay with slit throats over their school books---for the
glory of allah. The LIBELS as stated above by rigs are the typical
islamic justification for their filth----for more information on this
disgusting custom----read the koran---THE ENTIRE AGE OF ARAB
ISLAMIC INVASION, invasion, rape, murder, enslavement and
pillage was "justified" simply as SOMEONE INSULTED THE
RAPIST PIG OF MECCA. Muslim populations are STILL at it in
Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and any other place with a muslim population situated in the vicinity of a non-muslim population
 
Albert Einstein was against the Zionist terrorists like Menachem Begin, not against Jews living in Palestine.
He wanted to move to Palestine as well, but not when murdering terrorist were in charge.
In particular, Einstein wrote an apology for the Zionist massacre of Dier Yassin.
He wrote this letter right after the Zionist massacre of Dier Yassin.

{...
April 10, 1948

Mr. Shepard Rifkin
Exec. Director
American Friends of the Fighters
for the Freedom of Israel
149 Second Ave.
New York 3,N.Y.

Dear Sir:

When a real and final catastrophe should befall us in Palestine the first responsible for it would be the British and the second responsible for it the Terrorist organizations build up from our own ranks [Jewish].

I am not willing to see anybody associated with those misled and criminal people.

Sincerely yours,
Albert Einstein
...}

i wouldn’t call that an apology letter sounds like he is calling out the brits for not maintaining order during the Palistine civil war between the arabs and jews in the region.

Ultimately that was ended…then other Arab nations invaded Israel. Thar war ended too, with a now independent Israel. Since then the Arabs have cried about losing and the land they lost from their invasion.
 
i wouldn’t call that an apology letter sounds like he is calling out the brits for not maintaining order during the Palistine civil war between the arabs and jews in the region.

Ultimately that was ended…then other Arab nations invaded Israel. Thar war ended too, with a now independent Israel. Since then the Arabs have cried about losing and the land they lost from their invasion.
the deir Yassin event was a battle between jews and arabs in which both sides sustained losses. The arab village had been a launching
site for arab attacks since it was on the road to the Jewish areas of
East Jerusalem upon which arabs had established a deadly starvation siege.
The jewish attacking party was the IRGUN which lots of people
considered RADICAL with a tendency to go in for overkill ----and that's all there was to it. Eventually the surviving jews of East Jerusalem were rescued-----they lost their homes and that is the JARRAH problem of today-----because according to shariah law jews do not
own land and muslims are LEGALLY permitted to pillage jews.
My very own hubby is from a community that had been in the land
of his birth for something like 1500 years before the rapist pig
of mecca was born-----but it became a shariah shit hole
when arabian muslims enacted their GLORIOUS age of islamic
conquest. Fortunately he was rescued from the filth approx. 1942
---a few years before a 1947 pogrom in which the throats of jewish
babies were slit for the glory of allah. Jews did not own land there
either
 
Wrong again.
Franco was pro Jewish.
{...
Franco not only stood up to Hitler and adamantly refused to hand over the approximately 40,000 European Jews who had sought refuge in Spain, he also provided protection for Jews in Nazi-occupied Eastern Europe with Spanish passports.
...}


There is nothing for me to read about the King David Hotel bombing.
Menachem Begin tied up all the native kitchen workers and placed 12 milk canisters of explosives in the kitchen, murdering about 100 innocent people, including the leadership of the British peace keepers.

The claim a warning was phones in is a lie, because any search would instantly have revealed the tied up staff.
And clearly since the staff was tied up, the Zionists who placed the bombs intended them to die.
Another lie. You don’t want to read? That speaks Volumes
 
Wrong.
The blockade of Jerusalem was during the 1948 war when the Jews in Jerusalem illegally tried to make Jerusalem part of Israel.
It was an act of war, and they were lucky they were not shot for their treason, instead of just being made to leave.

The "Hebron Massacre" was deliberately provoked and started by Zionists.

{...
The city of Hebron holds special significance in Judaism and Islam, it being the site of the Tomb of the Patriarchs. In 1929, the population of the city numbered around 20,000, the majority of whom were Muslim Arabs. A small community of around 700 Jews lived in and around Hebron.

A few dozen Jews lived deep within Hebron, in a kind of ghetto, where there were several synagogues[15] and the Hebron Yeshiva,[16][17] but the majority rented houses from Arab proprietors on the outskirts.[18][19] The Jewish community was divided between relatively recent European (Ashkenazi)[16] immigrants and an older population of descendants of Sephardic Jews who had inhabited the town for centuries. Ashkenazi Jews had been established in the town for at least a century.[20] The two communities, Sephardic and Ashkenazi, maintained separate schools, worshipped in separate synagogues, and did not intermarry. The Sephardics were Arabic speakers, wore Arab dress and were well integrated, whereas many of the Ashkenazi community were yeshiva students who maintained 'foreign' ways, and had difficulties and misunderstandings with the Arab population.[21] The tensions between the two Jewish communities, both very traditionalist, were not caused by diverging worldviews, but only by differences of culture and ritual practice. The progressive trends of the new Western arrivals in Palestine, represented by both foreign powers and modernising Jewish philantropists and organisations, were a different matter altogether.[22] Since the Balfour Declaration of 1917, tensions had been growing between the Arab and Jewish communities in Palestine.[23] The Muslim community of Hebron had a reputation for being highly conservative in religion. Though Jews had suffered numerous vexations in the past, and this hostility was to take an anti-Zionist turn after the Balfour Declaration,[24] a peaceful relationship existed between both communities.[25] During the riots of 1920 and 1921, Hebron's Jews had been spared the violence that broke out elsewhere.[26]

In mid-August 1929, hundreds of Jewish nationalists marched to the Western Wall in Jerusalem shouting slogans such as "The Wall is Ours" and raising the Jewish national flag.[20] Rumours spread that Jewish youths had also attacked Arabs and had cursed Muhammad.[27][28] Following an inflammatory sermon the next day, hundreds of Muslims converged on the Western Wall, burning prayer books and injuring the beadle. The rioting soon spread to the Jewish commercial area of town[29][30] and the next day, August 17, a young Jew was stabbed to death.[31] The authorities failed to quell the violence. On Friday, August 23, inflamed by rumors that Jews were planning to attack al-Aqsa Mosque, Arabs started to attack Jews in the Old City of Jerusalem. The first murders of the day took place when two or three Arabs passing by the Jewish Quarter of Mea Shearim were killed.[32] Rumours that Jews had massacred Arabs in Jerusalem then reached Hebron by that evening.[18] Hillel Cohen frames his recent narrative of the incident in terms of the murder of the Jaffa Awan family by a Jewish police constable called Simcha Hinkis.[33]
...}

With 700 Jews and 20,000 Moslems, clearly the Jews were being defended by Moslems.
The conflict was obviously deliberately started by Zionists.
The first deaths were Moslem.
Another lie
1929 Hebron massacre - Wikipedia
 
Wrong.
The Zionist are on record starting all the violence, always.
Arabs never attacked any Jews first.

Palestine was the main reason the Arabs joined the Allies in WWI.
They did not think in terms of Palestine much before that because they were not independent.
But the Romans, Greeks, Egyptians, etc. always referred to Palestine in their documents referring to the region.
No one in any History refers to Israel as anything but a city state that existed for only a few hundred years.

You are a Pathological Liar. You cant help yourself, can you?
 
Israel has been guilty of war crimes against Palestinians for decades, you idiot. And we're paying for it.
There is no such thing as a Palestinian. They are filthy ARABS. Terrorists. The PLO has no right to that land.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top