Sean Hannity

brneyedgrl80

Member
May 25, 2004
558
5
16
Phoenix-it's-dry-heat-Arizona
This is for you RWA :p:

Pick it apart as you will. :rolleyes:

The Document Sean Hannity Doesn't Want You To Read

June 16, 2004

Speaking at the Take Back America conference on June 3, American Progress CEO John Podesta said, "I think when you get so distant from the facts as -- as guys like Limbaugh and Sean Hannity do, yeah, I think that tends to -- it kind of -- it tends to corrupt the dialogue." _Apparently he struck a nerve with Fox News' Sean Hannity. Hannity challenged Podesta to "defend and explain one example where I -- where I said something that was so false."_ Since choosing just one of Hannity's distortions is too difficult, here are fifteen examples:

All Hannity quotes from Hannity and Colmes unless otherwise noted.

1. WMD

HANNITY: "You're not listening, Susan. You've got to learn something. He had weapons of mass destruction. He promised to disclose them. And he didn't do it. You would have let him go free; we decided to hold him accountable." (4/13/04)

FACT: Hannity's assertion comes more than six months after Bush Administration weapons inspector David Kay testified his inspection team had "not uncovered evidence that Iraq undertook significant post-1998 steps to actually build nuclear weapons or produce fissile material" and had not discovered any chemical or biological weapons._ (Bush Administration Weapons Inspector David Kay, 10/2/03)

2. Colin Powell on Iraq

HANNITY: "Colin Powell just had a great piece that he had in the paper today. He was there [in Iraq]. He said things couldn't have been better." (9/19/03)

FACT: "Iraq has come very far, but serious problems remain, starting with security. American commanders and troops told me of the many threats they face--from leftover loyalists who want to return Iraq to the dark days of Saddam, from criminals who were set loose on Iraqi society when Saddam emptied the jails and, increasingly, from outside terrorists who have come to Iraq to open a new front in their campaign against the civilized world." (Colin Powell, 9/19/03)

3. Saddam/Al-Qaeda Connection

HANNITY: "And in northern Iraq today, this very day, al Qaeda is operating camps there, and they are attacking the Kurds in the north, and this has been well-documented and well chronicled. Now, if you're going to go after al Qaeda in every aspect, and obviously they have the support of Saddam, or we're not." (12/9/02)

FACT: David Kay was on the ground for months investigating the activities of Hussein's regime. He concluded "But we simply did not find any evidence of extensive links with Al Qaeda, or for that matter any real links at all." He called a speech where Cheney made the claim there was a link "evidence free." (Boston Globe, 6/16/04)

4. 9/11 Investigation

HANNITY: "[After 9-11], liberal Democrats at first showed little interest in the investigation of the roots of this massive intelligence failure...[Bush and his team] made it clear that determining the causes of America's security failures and finding and remedying its weak points would be central to their mission." (Let Freedom Ring, by Sean Hannity)

TRUTH: Bush Opposed the creation of a special commission to probe the causes of 9/11 for over a year. On 5/23/02 CBS New Reported "President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11." Bush didn't relent to pressure to create a commission, mostly from those Hannity would consider "liberal" until September 2002. (CBS News, 5/23/02; ABC News, 9/20/02)

5. The Recession

HANNITY: "First of all, this president -- you know and I know and everybody knows -- inherited a recession...it was by every definition a recession" (11/6/02)

HANNITY: "Now here's where we are. The inherited Clinton/Gore recession. That's a fact." (5/6/03)

HANNITY: "The president inherited a recession." (7/10/03)

HANNITY: "He got us out of the Clinton-Gore recession." (10/23/03)

HANNITY: "They did inherit the recession. They did inherit the recession. We got out of the recession." (12/12/03)

HANNITY: "And this is the whole point behind this ad, because the president did inherit a recession." (1/6/04)

HANNITY: "Historically in every recovery, because the president rightly did inherit a recession. But historically, the lagging indicator always deals with employment." (1/15/04)

HANNITY: "Congressman Deutsch, maybe you forgot but I'll be glad to remind you, the president did inherit that recession." (1/20/04)

HANNITY: "He did inherit a recession, and we're out of the recession." (2/2/04)

HANNITY: "The president inherited a recession." (2/23/04)

HANNITY: "The president inherited a recession." (3/3/04)

HANNITY: "Well, you know, we're going to show ads, as a matter of fact, in the next segment, Congressman. Thanks for promoting our next segment. What I like about them is everything I've been saying the president ought to do: is focusing in on his positions, on keeping the nation secure in very difficult times, what he's been able to do to the economy after inheriting a very difficult recession, and of course, the economic impact of 9/11." (3/3/04)

HANNITY: "All right. So this is where I view the economic scenario as we head into this election. The president inherited a recession." (3/16/04)

HANNITY: "First of all, we've got to put it into perspective, is that the president inherited a recession." (3/26/04)

HANNITY: "Clearly, we're out of the recession that President Bush inherited." (4/2/04)

HANNITY: "Stop me where I'm wrong. The president inherited a recession, the economic impact of 9/11 was tremendous on the economy, correct?" (4/6/04)

HANNITY: "[President George W. Bush] did inherit a recession." (5/3/04)

HANNITY: "[W]e got [the weak U.S. economy] out of the Clinton-Gore recession." (5/18/04)

HANNITY: "We got out of the Clinton-Gore recession." (5/27/04)

HANNITY: "We got out of the Clinton-Gore recession." (6/4/04)

FACT: "The recession officially began in March of 2001 -- two months after Bush was sworn in -- according to the universally acknowledged arbiter of such things, the National Bureau of Economic Research. And the president, at other times, has said so himself." (Washington Post, 7/1/03)

6. The Hispanic Vote

HANNITY: "The Hispanic community got to know him in Texas. They went almost overwhelming for him. He more than quadrupled the Hispanic vote that he got in that state." (9/16/03)

FACT: Exit polls varied in 1998 governors race, but under best scenario he increased his Hispanic vote from 24 to 49 percent – a doubling not a quadrupling. He lost Texas Hispanics to Gore in 2000, 54-43 percent._(Source: NCLR , NHCSL)

7. White House Vandalism

HANNITY: "Look, we've had these reports, very disturbing reports -- and I have actually spoken to people that have confirmed a lot of the reports -- about the trashing of the White House. Pornographic materials left in the printers. They cut the phone lines. Lewd and crude messages on phone machines. Stripping of anything that was not bolted down on Air Force One. $200,000 in furniture taken out." (1/26/01)

TRUTH: According to statements from the General Services Administration that were reported on May 17, little if anything out of the ordinary occurred during the transition, and "the condition of the real property was consistent with what we would expect to encounter when tenants vacate office space after an extended occupancy." (FAIR)

8. Patriotism

HANNITY: "I never questioned anyone's patriotism." (9/18/03)

FACT:

HANNITY: (to attorney Stanley Cohen) "Is it you hate this president or that you hate America?" (4/30/03)

HANNITY: "Governor, why wouldn't anyone want to say the Pledge of Allegiance, unless they detested their own country or were ignorant of its greatness?" (6/12/03)

HANNITY: "You could explain something about your magazine, [the Nation]. Lisa Featherstone writing about the hate America march, the [anti-war] march that took place over the weekend..." (1/22/03)

HANNITY: "'I hate America.' This is the extreme left. There is a portion of the left -- not everybody who's left -- that does hate this country and blame this country for the ills of the world..." (1/23/02)

HANNITY: (speaking to Sara Flounders co-director of the International Action Center) "You don't like this country, do you? You don't -- you think this is an evil country. By your description of it right here, you think it's a bad country." (9/25/01)

9. Separation of Church and State

HANNITY: "It doesn't say anywhere in the Constitution this idea of the separation of church and state." (8/25/03)

FACT: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." (1st Amendment)

"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." (Article VI)

10. James Madison

HANNITY: "You want to refer to some liberal activist judge..., that's fine, but I'm going to go directly to the source. The author of the Bill of Rights [James Madison] hired the first chaplain in 1789, and I gotta' tell ya' somethin', I think the author of the Bill of Rights knows more about the original intent--no offense to you and your liberal atheist activism--knows more about it than you do." (9/4/02)

TRUTH: The first congressional chaplains weren't hired by James Madison--they were appointed by a committee of the Senate and House in, respectively, April and May, 1789, before the First Amendment even existed. James Madison's view: "Is the appointment of Chaplains to the two Houses of Congress consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle of religious freedom? In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative."_ (James Madison)

11. Alabama Constitution

HANNITY: "But the Alabama Constitution, which Chief Justice Roy Moore is sworn to uphold, clearly it says, as a matter of fact that the recognition of God is the foundation of that state's Constitution." (8/21/03)

FACT: While the preamble of the Alabama Constitution does reference "the Almighty," section three provides: "That no religion shall be established by law; that no preference shall be given by law to any religious sect, society, denomination, or mode of worship; that no one shall be compelled by law to attend any place of worship; nor to pay any tithes, taxes, or other rate for building or repairing any place of worship, or for maintaining any minister or ministry; that no religious test shall be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under this state; and that the civil rights, privileges, and capacities of any citizen shall not be in any manner affected by his religious principles." (Alabama Constitution, Section 3)

12. Rent for Public Housing

HANNITY: Betsy, they're not going to lose it [public housing], because if you work less than 30 hours a week -- if you work more than 30 hours a week, you don't have to do it. If you're between the ages of 18 and 62 and you're not legally disabled and you have free housing -- in other words...

BETSY MCCAUGHEY: No. Wait a second, Sean. Let me correct you. Most people in public housing are not receiving free housing. Many of them are paying almost market rates.

HANNITY: Betsy, that is so ridiculous and so false, it's hardly even worth spending the time._(10/23/03)

FACT:_ Residents of public housing pay rent scaled to their household's anticipated gross annual income, less deductions for dependents and disabilities._ The basic formula for rent is 30 percent of this monthly adjusted income._ There are exceptions for extremely low incomes, but the minimum rent is $25 per month._ No one lives in public housing for free._(Department of Housing and Urban Development)

13. Kerry Tax Plan

HANNITY: "The Kerry campaign wants to cut taxes on people who make two hundred thousand dollars. She [Teresa Heinz Kerry] only paid 14.7 percent of her income in taxes, because their plan doesn't go to dividends, only income. So they don't want to tax themselves." (5/12/04)

FACT: Kerry's plan would "Restore the capital gains and dividend rates for families making over $200,000 on income earned above $200,000 to their levels under President Clinton. (Kerry Press Release, 4/7/04)

14. Kerry and Weapons Systems

HANNITY: "He's [Kerry's] flip-flopped all over the place... on the issue of Iraq. All the munitions that we have built up, most of them wouldn't be there." (1/30/04)

HANNITY: "But he wanted to cancel…every major weapons system. Specific votes that he would have canceled the weapons systems we now use." (2/26/04)

FACT: "In 1991, Kerry opposed an amendment to impose an arbitrary 2 percent cut in the military budget. In 1992, he opposed an amendment to cut Pentagon intelligence programs by $1 billion. In 1994, he voted against a motion to cut $30.5 billion from the defense budget over the next five years and to redistribute the money to programs for education and the disabled. That same year, he opposed an amendment to postpone construction of a new aircraft carrier. In 1996, he opposed a motion to cut six F-18 jet fighters from the budget. In 1999, he voted against a motion to terminate the Trident II missile." (Slate, 2/25/04)

15. Kerry and the CIA

HANNITY: "If he (Kerry) had his way and the CIA would almost be nonexistent." (1/30/04)

FACT: John Kerry has supported $200 billion in intelligence funding over the past seven years - a 50 percent increase since 1996.

Kerry votes supporting intelligence funding:

FY03 Intel Authorization $39.3-$41.3 Billion
[2002, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 9/25/02]

FY02 Intel Authorization $33 Billion
[2001, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 12/13/01]

FY01 Intel Authorization $29.5-$31.5 Billion
[2000, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 12/6/00]

FY00 Intel Authorization $29-$30 Billion
[1999, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 11/19/1999]

FY99 Intel Authorization $29.0 Billion
[1998, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 10/8/98]

FY98 Intel Authorization $26.7 Billion
[1997, Senate Roll Call Vote #109]

FY97 Intel Authorization $26.6 Billion
[1996, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 9/25/96]

(Source: CDI)

http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=91585

Is it lying or is Hannity just an idiot? And if it's just that he's an idiot why do people listen? :confused:
 
Simply because you refuse to accept the truth doesn't mean it isn't so. If you're looking for idiots, you need look no further than your own political party.

And if you want to build any credibility, you need to come up with something better than this lame cut and paste hatchet job from some left wing website.
 
This is all crap.

An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

You're calling a different opinion the fact on most of the rest.

GO read the actual report about what the commission said about connections between alquaeda and saddam. THERE WERE CONNECTIONS TO ALQAEDA, just none DIRECTLY to 9/11; the mainstream media is blatantly lying.
 
You guys are dismissing her post because its from a site you don't care for? talk about judgemental.

try refuting her facts with facts instead of ignoring what you don't want to believe.
 
Every single one of those accusations is not a lie. Only that the author has a different point of view then it becomes a lie in the author's mind. There was an awful lot of twisting on the author's part.
 
How much of this stuff has already been refuted already?
It's like a broken record. Same shit different day. How many links have to be posted about WMD? The UN, Clinton, CNN, the French, Bambi and God knows who else have all said time and time again that Saddam had them.

How about something positive instead of beating these dead fucking horses over and over and over again. How many times can the same shit be posted as fact, shot down, and posted again from a different site?

Do you not get sick of reading the same arguements over and over and over again, every day, day in and day out?

The left wing anybody but Bush crowd has nothing positive to say at all. Just keep grinding on this crap day in and day out until the masses finally swallow this tripe:mad:

Regain power at all costs, that's the true agenda.
 
Originally posted by DKSuddeth
You guys are dismissing her post because its from a site you don't care for? talk about judgemental.

try refuting her facts with facts instead of ignoring what you don't want to believe.

Wouldnt she have to prevent facts first?
 
Sounds to me like things are being spun to make it sound like Sean H. was wrong. Doesn't look legit to me. Sean H. is a smart man and I thnk it would be far harder than this to prove him wrong on his facts.
 
Originally posted by Gop guy
Yes, I had expected better from bryneyegrl.

Really? Why? She can't wait to go see m-i-c, k-e-y, m-o-u-s-e's movie.

She's a died in the wool lib, and every once and awhile, the true colors show.
 
Originally posted by JIHADTHIS
How much of this stuff has already been refuted already?
It's like a broken record. Same shit different day. How many links have to be posted about WMD? The UN, Clinton, CNN, the French, Bambi and God knows who else have all said time and time again that Saddam had them.

How about something positive instead of beating these dead fucking horses over and over and over again. How many times can the same shit be posted as fact, shot down, and posted again from a different site?

Do you not get sick of reading the same arguements over and over and over again, every day, day in and day out?

The left wing anybody but Bush crowd has nothing positive to say at all. Just keep grinding on this crap day in and day out until the masses finally swallow this tripe:mad:

Regain power at all costs, that's the true agenda.


:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
 
To me the piece doesn't make sense.

SH knows what he's talking about most of the time. He's not off this often, and I don't see where he's off at all.

Maybe it's me.
 
Originally posted by Tippy Toes
To me the piece doesn't make sense.

SH knows what he's talking about most of the time. He's not off this often, and I don't see where he's off at all.

Maybe it's me.

Liberals are going down hard in this country. They know it and it's driving them insane. They can no longer think straight.
 
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Liberals are going down hard in this country. They know it and it's driving them insane. They can no longer think straight.

I'm thinking just fine for a liberal, thank you very much.
 
Originally posted by DKSuddeth
I'm thinking just fine for a liberal, thank you very much.

But DK, YOU'RE NOT A LIBERAL! The smartest woman in the world and I agree on this you know!!:D :)
 
It's amazing how if a liberal posts something from a liberal site it's utter crap, but if someone posts something from a right wing site it's truth. Just because it goes against your line of thinking doesn't mean it's false as I have found in the past and even on this board. As DK said, maybe you guys should try refuting what the author wrote. If you think these are facts, refute them. If you think these aren't facts, say how they are not. To just dismiss what an author wrote because you don't agree is silly.

And PR, I never said "I can hardly wait for Moore's movie" or "I'm dying to see his movie". I said that I will more and likely go see it. Just read pasts posts under some of the Michael Moore threads. And I've never denied being a liberal, just as you haven't denied being a conservative and I don't see anything wrong with either.
 
Originally posted by brneyedgrl80
It's amazing how if a liberal posts something from a liberal site it's utter crap, but if someone posts something from a right wing site it's truth. Just because it goes against your line of thinking doesn't mean it's false as I have found in the past and even on this board. As DK said, maybe you guys should try refuting what the author wrote. If you think these are facts, refute them. If you think these aren't facts, say how they are not. To just dismiss what an author wrote because you don't agree is silly.

And PR, I never said "I can hardly wait for Moore's movie" or "I'm dying to see his movie". I said that I will more and likely go see it. Just read pasts posts under some of the Michael Moore threads. And I've never denied being a liberal, just as you haven't denied being a conservative and I don't see anything wrong with either.

You don't understand the difference between opinion and fact.


Sean gives an opinion. "the war is going well"

Libs then give facts backing an opposing opinion and want to consider the debate over. But it's not over at that point. There are facts which sean can point to to support his opinion as well. But you don't want to hear those. You want to consider it over. But it's not.
 
Originally posted by brneyedgrl80
It's amazing how if a liberal posts something from a liberal site it's utter crap, but if someone posts something from a right wing site it's truth. Just because it goes against your line of thinking doesn't mean it's false as I have found in the past and even on this board. As DK said, maybe you guys should try refuting what the author wrote. If you think these are facts, refute them. If you think these aren't facts, say how they are not. To just dismiss what an author wrote because you don't agree is silly.

And PR, I never said "I can hardly wait for Moore's movie" or "I'm dying to see his movie". I said that I will more and likely go see it. Just read pasts posts under some of the Michael Moore threads. And I've never denied being a liberal, just as you haven't denied being a conservative and I don't see anything wrong with either.

How about an admission that your posts re: the 9/11 commission are LIES!!!!! If you can't admit to this then your credibilty is worthless. Ever consider that this is why your posts get called CRAP ?????
 

Forum List

Back
Top