SCOTUS dismisses several Election Lawsuits, gives no explanation

Yup!

Our Supreme Court neglects its duty once again and refuses to hear Pennsylvania election case
.

A majority on our Supreme Court has once again refused to perform its constitutionally assigned duty and Justice Thomas calls this negligence ‘Inexplicable’. See: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable’

Feb 22, 2021

”The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.”

HERE IS A LINK to the Thomas dissent.

Thomas wrote:

"These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

And . . .

“One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us,”

Thomas also wrote:

“An election system lacks clear rules when, as here, different officials dispute who has authority to set or change those rules. This kind of dispute brews confusion because voters may not know which rules to follow. Even worse, with more than one system of rules in place, competing candidates might each declare victory under different sets of rules.”

It is becoming more obvious as each day passes that a majority on our Supreme Court is intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion and rebellion by refusing to abide by and enforce the provisions of our Constitution, and it is replacing the very intentions and beliefs under which our Constitution was adopted with their personal views of social justice, fairness and reasonableness.

JWK

"The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." – Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968
 
The fix is in folks. The three true patriots dissented.


The excuse here is:
AszQ4t06.jpeg
Your blob appointed 1/3 of the court. He fixed it against himself? I hope you're fixed and won't have kids.
All he can do is pick people already in the DOJ. He isn’t a mind reader and can’t know everything about them. Roberts is a Lolita Express pedo, so that explains how he was blackmailed into approving ObamaCare, and other important decisions were he always sides with the Dems. Kavanaugh has turned out to be a big bitch too. Something is definitely up with those Catholics. President Trump should had appointed some conservative Protestants, there are none of the court as they are all Catholics and Jews. The largest group of Christians in America isn’t represented at all on the SCOTUS. A big reason we are losing our Republic.
 
The fix is in folks. The three true patriots dissented.

Gee, a whole TWO DAYS to review 3.3 million ballots!

Three men with balls: Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch.

Funny that NOWHERE in the entire article did I read ONE WORD about any of these cases being ruled baseless, a conspiracy theory or without evidence, as claimed by JimH52, ElmerMudd, The Banker, Dana7360, Johnlaw, Rye Catcher, Ben Thompson, francoHFW, JackOfNoTrade, C_Clayton_Jones, danielpalos, Lesh, Mr Clean, or the Mean One.

They all SAY it is, but I've yet been able to get one of them to back up ONE WORD of their allegation with a spec of proof.
 
We can't trust the Judicial branch of government to protect our Liberty any more than we can trust the Legislative or Executive branches.



It would seem that the Roberts-led Supreme Court is doing, much as the Congress has for years, giving up its powers to the Executive Branch. Then Trump got in power and Congress decided that Trump had and was using WAY too much of his power! So they impeached him for exercising his constitutionally-given powers.

That is until Joe got in. Now they are back to letting Biden settle everything for all three branches with 73 EOs a month. :smoke:
 
The fix is in folks. The three true patriots dissented.


The excuse here is:
AszQ4t06.jpeg
Your blob appointed 1/3 of the court. He fixed it against himself? I hope you're fixed and won't have kids.
All he can do is pick people already in the DOJ. He isn’t a mind reader and can’t know everything about them. Roberts is a Lolita Express pedo, so that explains how he was blackmailed into approving ObamaCare, and other important decisions were he always sides with the Dems. Kavanaugh has turned out to be a big bitch too. Something is definitely up with those Catholics. President Trump should had appointed some conservative Protestants, there are none of the court as they are all Catholics and Jews. The largest group of Christians in America isn’t represented at all on the SCOTUS. A big reason we are losing our Republic.
Really? Where is that written that he can only pick people in the DOJ?
 
The fix is in folks. The three true patriots dissented.


The excuse here is:
AszQ4t06.jpeg
Your blob appointed 1/3 of the court. He fixed it against himself? I hope you're fixed and won't have kids.
All he can do is pick people already in the DOJ. He isn’t a mind reader and can’t know everything about them. Roberts is a Lolita Express pedo, so that explains how he was blackmailed into approving ObamaCare, and other important decisions were he always sides with the Dems. Kavanaugh has turned out to be a big bitch too. Something is definitely up with those Catholics. President Trump should had appointed some conservative Protestants, there are none of the court as they are all Catholics and Jews. The largest group of Christians in America isn’t represented at all on the SCOTUS. A big reason we are losing our Republic.
Really? Where is that written that he can only pick people in the DOJ?
Most Justices are picked from federal circuits where they already served as a justice for quite some time. So don’t act like you wouldn’t had howled like banshee if he had selected otherwise.
 
The fix is in folks. The three true patriots dissented.


The excuse here is:
AszQ4t06.jpeg
Your blob appointed 1/3 of the court. He fixed it against himself? I hope you're fixed and won't have kids.
All he can do is pick people already in the DOJ. He isn’t a mind reader and can’t know everything about them. Roberts is a Lolita Express pedo, so that explains how he was blackmailed into approving ObamaCare, and other important decisions were he always sides with the Dems. Kavanaugh has turned out to be a big bitch too. Something is definitely up with those Catholics. President Trump should had appointed some conservative Protestants, there are none of the court as they are all Catholics and Jews. The largest group of Christians in America isn’t represented at all on the SCOTUS. A big reason we are losing our Republic.
Really? Where is that written that he can only pick people in the DOJ?
Most Justices are picked from federal circuits where they already served as a justice for quite some time. So don’t act like you wouldn’t had howled like banshee if he had selected otherwise.

So you lied earlier.

Imagine my shock.

As for the justices that you loved once and now you are very unhappy about....please continue to eat shit on the subject. Bon Apetit!
 
The fix is in folks. The three true patriots dissented.


The excuse here is:
AszQ4t06.jpeg

Defendant before hanging: "They are going to wrongfully hang me without due process. You must step in."

The Court: "It's not ripe. Wait until after the hanging. Then you may take action."

Letter from dead defendant after hanging: "They hanged me without due process."

The Court: "It's moot. You're already dead."
 
The fix is in folks. The three true patriots dissented.

Yes, "the fix" must be in because it's absolutely impossible that you ass clowns are simply wrong, right? No, that can't be it.
Then why won’t they hear the merits of the cases then make a decision? Clearly the PA case was 100% legally in the right, as the mail in vote law was unconstitutional according to PA’s constitution.

Clearly they looked at the facts that were provided and decided it didn't merit a hearing. The state legislature created a new class of absentee voting. It was not unconstitutional.
 
Yup!

Our Supreme Court neglects its duty once again and refuses to hear Pennsylvania election case
.

A majority on our Supreme Court has once again refused to perform its constitutionally assigned duty and Justice Thomas calls this negligence ‘Inexplicable’. See: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable’

Feb 22, 2021

”The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.”

HERE IS A LINK to the Thomas dissent.

Thomas wrote:

"These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

And . . .

“One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us,”

Thomas also wrote:

“An election system lacks clear rules when, as here, different officials dispute who has authority to set or change those rules. This kind of dispute brews confusion because voters may not know which rules to follow. Even worse, with more than one system of rules in place, competing candidates might each declare victory under different sets of rules.”

It is becoming more obvious as each day passes that a majority on our Supreme Court is intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion and rebellion by refusing to abide by and enforce the provisions of our Constitution, and it is replacing the very intentions and beliefs under which our Constitution was adopted with their personal views of social justice, fairness and reasonableness.

JWK

"The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." – Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968

Clearly Thomas' impartiality is a big question mark. His wife has been very vocal in saying there was election fraud.
 
Clearly Thomas' impartiality is a big question mark. His wife has been very vocal in saying there was election fraud.

Getting back to the subject, the fact is, Texas and the twenty other States which joined in the Texas lawsuit, does have standing and did raise a judiciable controversy in its election lawsuit


The Court’s ORDER dated, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2020, certainly asserts Texas has no standing nor raised a judiciable controversy, but as you can see, the Order offers no legal reasoning to substantiate Texas does not have standing, nor does the ORDER explain why the Court alleges Texas “. . . has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.”

On the other hand, our very own Supreme Court has emphatically pointed out in the past, when acts of corruption infect a federal electoral process in one state “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain” ___ Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)".

And in "McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1 (1892), the Court explained that Art. II, § 1, cl. 2, “convey the broadest power of determination” and “leaves it to the legislature exclusively to define the method” of appointment. 146 U. S., at 27. A significant departure from the legislative scheme for appointing Presidential electors presents a federal constitutional question."

In the instant case a “significant departure”, e.g., would be Pennsylvania’s passage of ACT 77 by its Legislature which failed to take the prescribed actions to amend the state constitution as needed before implementing it. This resulted in over a million illegal ballots being counted in PA’s election results.

When a number of states have disenfranchised the voters of Texas in a federal election by illegal voting practices in those states, which is what has occurred, it is beyond reasonable thinking to assert the State of Texas has no standing in the United States Supreme Court, nor has raised a judiciable controversy with those states, especially when the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over such controversies (Article 3, Section 2, Clause 1, USC)

And, in regard to voter disenfranchisement, see Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1 (2006)

“Confidence in the integrity of our electoral processes is essential to the functioning of our participatory democracy. Voter fraud drives honest citizens out of the democratic process and breeds distrust of our government. Voters who fear their legitimate votes will be outweighed by fraudulent ones will feel disenfranchised. “[T]he right of suffrage can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen’s vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise.” Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 555 (1964).”

JWK

When our federal judicial system ignores our written Constitutions, federal and state, and assents to acts contrary to our supreme law of the land, it not only opens the door to anarchy, but participates in and encourages such treachery.
 

Forum List

Back
Top