Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement (175 yrs)

[abu afak]

as ive said retard, then you agree w/ the douchebag that claimed IT was set up when in FACT, dog breathe created the situation itself. so, once again brainless, you in FACT agree w/ this treasonist bitch. so masks are only for you, according to this asswipe pill-osi and your point was?

My "points" destroyed your opinion AND your reasoning.
You lost.
(thus the ad hom)

`

 

[abu afak]

`

`
`

 

[Oddball]

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement

The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

www.politico.com

09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​

The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​

​

“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.​

​

“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​

The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​

​

“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​

[.....]​

`

Wait a sec....Is this supposed to be evidence of how "science" isn't now political?

 

[WTF19]

as ive said retard, then you agree w/ the douchebag that claimed IT was set up when in FACT, dog breathe created the situation itself. so, once again brainless, you in FACT agree w/ this treasonist bitch. so masks are only for you, according to this asswipe pill-osi and your point was?

My "points" destroyed your opinion AND your reasoning.
You lost.
(thus the ad hom)

`

no wrong again...your points are mute and you are biased...you lose

 

[Oddball]

`

View attachment 391413

`
`

No context, no facts, no nothing.

 

[abu afak]

`

`