Saying Jan 6 was an "Insurrection" is Bad Grammar

Why Can't We See the Other 14,000 Hours of J6 Video Footage?

The feds have been very picky about which videos from the January 6 Capitol protest we can and cannot see. Why is that? If those hundreds of thousands of filthy Trumpers tried to take over the United States, as Don Lemon told us, and the feds have it on tape, show us who the seditionary monsters are so loyal townsfolk can identify them and help put them into the stockades.

We’ve only seen the same worn-out, edited clips of protestors clashing with the police. The Department of Justice (DOJ) also released a three-hour video showing people fighting with Capitol police in a tunnel. What they are refusing to release is about 14,000 hours of surveillance, police body-cam, and phone video footage that might show another side of January 6.

“They don’t want the public to see that the vast majority of what went on was very peaceful,” Jonathon Moseley, attorney for J6 defendant Kelly Meggs, told The Epoch Times. “There were the violent videos they’ve shown, are all in just one location, or in a courtyard. You know, they keep showing over and over again this battle in the archway. That’s just one entrance out of a building that’s 700 feet long. So I think it would dilute their narrative to show everything.”

Releasing that unseen footage might cause some problems that the donkey brigade can’t handle. The truth is, there was no insurrection. But much like that borderline personality ex of yours, the left needs something to lord over our heads every time they screw up and need to deflect.

 
The Cambridge Dictionary defines “insurrection” as: “an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence” By that definition, there was no “insurrection” at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6,


It is not only bad grammar, it defies credulity. How exactly is this "take control of" the country accomplished? For that to happen, the military and the Supreme Court and the governors of the states and the White House and the FBI and the CIA and the NSA and all other agencies and law enforcement agencies would have to bow down to a group of guys who entered the Capitol. Because unless that happens, no overthrow is even possible, let alone intended.

That is the insanity of such a statement. The only way to see the capitol protest as a threat is to assume that the military and the Supreme Court and the governors of the states and the White House and the FBI and the CIA and the NSA, etc. etc. are all going to start obeying them.

But of course,, they are not.

America is not some banana Republic were you can occupy the palace of Il Presidente and rule the country. A physical overthrow of America is not even possible. Thats why all the crying about it being the worst day ever is not believable.


There was no way they were going to overthrow the government of the United States. It was a riot. It was a dangerous riot. It should have never happened, and it should never happen again, but people should not be misled to think that the protestors were on the verge of overthrowing the government.
Quibbles over whether Trump's failed goon attack on Congress was an "insurrection" - e.g., "This failed attempt to obstruct the Congress, this failed insurrection, only underscores how crucial the task before us is for our Republic." Mitch McConnell( R), aside, many of Trump's goons have been apprehended, prosecuted for seditious conspiracy and other crimes, and are being convicted and confessing.

The full extent of the failed scheme to overthrow the will of the People is still being exposed. Attempts by Trump to seize and impound some states' voting machines, intimidation of Republican governors and secretaries of state to falsify vote counts, threatening the Vice President if he respected the Constitution and refused to overturn the 2020 election by throwing out certified electoral votes, sending false electoral vote certificates to Congress, etc., etc., etc. are all still being litigated.

Rather than whining about the ongoing accrual of evidence, we should trust in American jurisprudence and the rules of evidence by which culpability is established only if that evidence so merits.


 
The Cambridge Dictionary defines “insurrection” as: “an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence” By that definition, there was no “insurrection” at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, ...

Eh? Exactly this did happen but fortunatelly did fail. With the help of extremists and useful idiots Donald Trump tried to overtake the USA and to make the democracy and republic USA to his own anti-democratic and anti-republican personal possession where everyone had to be 100% loyal to his own person.
 
Eh? Exactly this did happen

No it didn't. How are some people entering a building going to take control of the US government. Did you even read the OP?

How exactly is this "take control of" the country accomplished? For that to happen, the military and the Supreme Court and the governors of the states and the White House and the FBI and the CIA and the NSA and all other agencies and law enforcement agencies would have to bow down to a group of guys who entered the Capitol. Because unless that happens, no overthrow is even possible, let alone intended.

That is the insanity of such a statement. The only way to see the capitol protest as a threat is to assume that the military and the Supreme Court and the governors of the states and the White House and the FBI and the CIA and the NSA, etc. etc. are all going to start obeying them.

But of course,, they are not.
 
Another moron liar who loses all credibility with one retarded post.

Trump never told anyone to do anything liar.

Trump DID call the national guard and Pelosi held them back.
On the other hand, there is reality.

You really shouldn't dismiss it. That is where your venerated Loser has been on a relentless and precipitous downward trajectory:

If you can compose yourself and refrain from flailing the mindless pom poms for a moment, here is a little mental exercise that may bring you a bit closer to the truth: Make a list of all of the Cry Baby Sore Loser's "Trump wins...." headlines since he lost the presidential election, even any in Trumpy media and your propaganda outlets.

Screen Shot 2021-02-15 at 11.16.34 AM.png

I'm goin' down, down, down, down
I'm goin' down, down, down, down
I'm goin' down, down, down, down

I'm goin' down, down, down, down

 
These childish stupidities you call posts prove that you have no clue about reality.
Okay, I admit it, I already knew there were no headlines you could cite concerning the Loser winning anything since the American electorate threw him out on his big, flabby tush in 2020.

But you still need propaganda that has not been thoroughly discredited. I liked the fantasy about Italian satellites dropping bamboo ballots on Canadian voting machines. That one was a hoot! Let's have more of those.

rejected request for National Guard ahead of Jan. 6


 
show us who the seditionary monsters are so loyal townsfolk can identify them and help put them into the stockades.
----------------------------------------------------------
Here, good poster Not-a-Monkey...knock yourself out.

Please drop a dime on one of your January 6th neighbors, or a BIL, a son, a work colleague.....if you know they stomped on a cop, MACE'd a policeman, broke through a door, stole a laptop, or pooped on the floor.
Do your part.
Don't whine about what you haven't seen.....do something about what you have. Duh!


1. The truth is, there was no insurrection.
2. Trump DID call the national guard and Pelosi held them back.
3. These childish stupidities you call posts prove that you have no clue about reality.

The triptych of posts above -- by the good poster Not-a-Monkey -- seems to be an inadvertent confession.
Hey, it happens.
Folks get so wrapped up in their rhetoric, their polemic, their beliefs.....that they blunder into an admission.
It happens.

PUT any name you chose on Jan 6.
Angry violent action is wrong.
You just dont get it do you.

Well, actually, my avatar thinks the poster 'sartre' speaks truth. In fact, does 'get it'.

Perhaps, as it appears, the good poster Not-a-Monkey thinks that "angry violent action" in an attempt to be persuasive of one's un-proven oft-debunked political fantasy is a good thing?

Yeah, I don't get it either.
 
Saying Jan 6 was an "Insurrection" is Bad Grammar
Not that the Left would ever notice nor care, most Lefties here operate on about a 5th grade level of thinking and language

LOL. Thats true

They are like that inlaw every family has with a wincing voice like chalk on a blackboard while believing they sing like Barbara Streisand.

LOLLLL.

Great analogy
 
No it didn't. How are some people entering a building going to take control of the US government. Did you even read the OP?

How exactly is this "take control of" the country accomplished? For that to happen, the military and the Supreme Court and the governors of the states and the White House and the FBI and the CIA and the NSA and all other agencies and law enforcement agencies would have to bow down to a group of guys who entered the Capitol. Because unless that happens, no overthrow is even possible, let alone intended.

That is the insanity of such a statement. The only way to see the capitol protest as a threat is to assume that the military and the Supreme Court and the governors of the states and the White House and the FBI and the CIA and the NSA, etc. etc. are all going to start obeying them.

But of course,, they are not.

You don't have children, right? ... mmm Whatever. ... I suggest to you to do what's the best for the children of the USA. And I don't think they like it to be old servants from King Donald III in the end of their lifes.
 
Last edited:
The Cambridge Dictionary defines “insurrection” as: “an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence” By that definition, there was no “insurrection” at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6,


It is not only bad grammar, it defies credulity. How exactly is this "take control of" the country accomplished? For that to happen, the military and the Supreme Court and the governors of the states and the White House and the FBI and the CIA and the NSA and all other agencies and law enforcement agencies would have to bow down to a group of guys who entered the Capitol. Because unless that happens, no overthrow is even possible, let alone intended.

That is the insanity of such a statement. The only way to see the capitol protest as a threat is to assume that the military and the Supreme Court and the governors of the states and the White House and the FBI and the CIA and the NSA, etc. etc. are all going to start obeying them.

But of course,, they are not.

America is not some banana Republic were you can occupy the palace of Il Presidente and rule the country. A physical overthrow of America is not even possible. Thats why all the crying about it being the worst day ever is not believable.


There was no way they were going to overthrow the government of the United States. It was a riot. It was a dangerous riot. It should have never happened, and it should never happen again, but people should not be misled to think that the protestors were on the verge of overthrowing the government.
The insurrectionists were trying to take control of the government away from duly elected Joe Biden and turn it over to the world's worst sore loser Donald Trump.

All caught up now?
 

Forum List

Back
Top