Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dead

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Ginsburg is to women's rights what Thurgood Marshall was to women's rights

What did she do for women's rights?

she advocated to have 9 Supreme Court woman justices

that's sexist how about 9 justices who can correctly interpret the intent of the Constitution namely the bill of rights?

no interpretation needed,,,it states its intent in clear english,,,
interpreting it has led us into the mess we are in,,,

True but it's been butchered and bastardized by American leftists we now need it interpreted

thats bullshit,,, just read it,, its in simple english,,,,,,

but youre right,, the left wing democrats and republicans have butchered it,,,

That's why gay marriage is a right and illegals have a right to be in America

the feds have no authority to be involved in marriage,,,

if you read the constitution you would know that,,,

Marriage has a definition. "WE" have allowed the State to REDEFINE marriage. If the state should be out, then it needs to be not controlled by leftists either

 

[progressive hunter]

Ginsburg is to women's rights what Thurgood Marshall was to women's rights

What did she do for women's rights?

she advocated to have 9 Supreme Court woman justices

that's sexist how about 9 justices who can correctly interpret the intent of the Constitution namely the bill of rights?

no interpretation needed,,,it states its intent in clear english,,,
interpreting it has led us into the mess we are in,,,

True but it's been butchered and bastardized by American leftists we now need it interpreted

thats bullshit,,, just read it,, its in simple english,,,,,,

but youre right,, the left wing democrats and republicans have butchered it,,,

That's why gay marriage is a right and illegals have a right to be in America

the feds have no authority to be involved in marriage,,,

if you read the constitution you would know that,,,

Marriage has a definition. "WE" have allowed the State to REDEFINE marriage. If the state should be out, then it needs to be not controlled by leftists either

correct,,,dems and repubes shouldnt control marriage,,,

and dont include me in the "WE"

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Ginsburg is to women's rights what Thurgood Marshall was to women's rights

What did she do for women's rights?

she advocated to have 9 Supreme Court woman justices

that's sexist how about 9 justices who can correctly interpret the intent of the Constitution namely the bill of rights?

no interpretation needed,,,it states its intent in clear english,,,
interpreting it has led us into the mess we are in,,,

True but it's been butchered and bastardized by American leftists we now need it interpreted

thats bullshit,,, just read it,, its in simple english,,,,,,

but youre right,, the left wing democrats and republicans have butchered it,,,

That's why gay marriage is a right and illegals have a right to be in America

the feds have no authority to be involved in marriage,,,

if you read the constitution you would know that,,,

I'm not disagreeing with you but the feds under obama did get involved
Someone like you or I don't need it interpreted but leftists have comprehensions problems with it.

deal with that problem,,dont compound it by doing what they did,,,

under the 1st amendment any two people have a right to assemble/marry who they want,,,

and YES if ten people want to marry its none of my business,,,

again your fighting the wrong argument with the wrong person
You said it was none of the feds business who people married I said under the obama years he made it federal business there is no right to marry but people made it a federal issue therefore some need it interpreted for its original intent.

how can something that doesnt exist be interpreted???

IT DOESNT EXIST,,,

THIS IS WHY i DONT WANT a conservative as SCOTUS pick and want a constitutionalist,,,

You're right it doesn't exist until Obama made it an issue and bastardized the constitution
The federal income tax is another thing that was added and interpreted incorrectly
The second amendment has been bastardized and interpreted incorrectly

best I can see about the gay marriage issue is they said it was a right which makes sense if you read the first amendment along with the rest of the constitution,,,

as for income tax,, it was done by amendment so its legal just very wrong,,,,
so it needs another amendment to remove it,,,

and yes the dems and repubes have destroyed the 2nd A because they interpreted it instead of reading it,,,

Actually the 16th amendment is not constitutional if you read the history of it
And since the constitution has been misinterpreted takes us back to what I originally said
"True but it's been butchered and bastardized by American leftists we now need it interpreted"
IT'S NEEDS TO BE INTERPRETED TO GET IT BACK TO IT'S ORIGINAL INTENT.

yes the dems and repubes tried interpreted it instead of reading it,,,

no interpretation needed,,, just read it,, its in simple english,,,

what history if the 16th did I miss???

AGAIN IF the constitution has been butchered and bastardized from it's true intent
It must be interpreted by original constitutional scholars to get us back to its true intent.

easier to just read it,,, its in simple english,,,

not when it's been butchered and bastardized

more so when its been bastardized and butchered,,,

how do you interpret things like,

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED,,,

CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAWS,,,

laws have been created around the misinterpreted constitution tha's why we need an original constitutional scholars to get us back to its true intent.

THATS why I want a constitutionalist not a conservative for SCOTUS,,,

Same thing.

 

[progressive hunter]

Ginsburg is to women's rights what Thurgood Marshall was to women's rights

What did she do for women's rights?

she advocated to have 9 Supreme Court woman justices

that's sexist how about 9 justices who can correctly interpret the intent of the Constitution namely the bill of rights?

no interpretation needed,,,it states its intent in clear english,,,
interpreting it has led us into the mess we are in,,,

True but it's been butchered and bastardized by American leftists we now need it interpreted

thats bullshit,,, just read it,, its in simple english,,,,,,

but youre right,, the left wing democrats and republicans have butchered it,,,

That's why gay marriage is a right and illegals have a right to be in America

the feds have no authority to be involved in marriage,,,

if you read the constitution you would know that,,,

I'm not disagreeing with you but the feds under obama did get involved
Someone like you or I don't need it interpreted but leftists have comprehensions problems with it.

deal with that problem,,dont compound it by doing what they did,,,

under the 1st amendment any two people have a right to assemble/marry who they want,,,

and YES if ten people want to marry its none of my business,,,

again your fighting the wrong argument with the wrong person
You said it was none of the feds business who people married I said under the obama years he made it federal business there is no right to marry but people made it a federal issue therefore some need it interpreted for its original intent.

how can something that doesnt exist be interpreted???

IT DOESNT EXIST,,,

THIS IS WHY i DONT WANT a conservative as SCOTUS pick and want a constitutionalist,,,

You're right it doesn't exist until Obama made it an issue and bastardized the constitution
The federal income tax is another thing that was added and interpreted incorrectly
The second amendment has been bastardized and interpreted incorrectly

best I can see about the gay marriage issue is they said it was a right which makes sense if you read the first amendment along with the rest of the constitution,,,

as for income tax,, it was done by amendment so its legal just very wrong,,,,
so it needs another amendment to remove it,,,

and yes the dems and repubes have destroyed the 2nd A because they interpreted it instead of reading it,,,

Actually the 16th amendment is not constitutional if you read the history of it
And since the constitution has been misinterpreted takes us back to what I originally said
"True but it's been butchered and bastardized by American leftists we now need it interpreted"
IT'S NEEDS TO BE INTERPRETED TO GET IT BACK TO IT'S ORIGINAL INTENT.

yes the dems and repubes tried interpreted it instead of reading it,,,

no interpretation needed,,, just read it,, its in simple english,,,

what history if the 16th did I miss???

AGAIN IF the constitution has been butchered and bastardized from it's true intent
It must be interpreted by original constitutional scholars to get us back to its true intent.

easier to just read it,,, its in simple english,,,

not when it's been butchered and bastardized

more so when its been bastardized and butchered,,,

how do you interpret things like,

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED,,,

CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAWS,,,

laws have been created around the misinterpreted constitution tha's why we need an original constitutional scholars to get us back to its true intent.

THATS why I want a constitutionalist not a conservative for SCOTUS,,,

Same thing.

yep,,,both are leftists,,,

 

[Ropey]

if it's a woman, he should pick Britt Grant or Barbara Lagoa. Amy Barrett is against the death penalty, i wouldn't pick her

Britt is a close friend of Kavanaugh and the youngest in Trump's list

Barbara is Cuban American, so it would be a historic pick

You spelled 'A Historic Mistake' wrong.
Potential SCOTUS pick Barbara Lagoa on Roe v Wade (to questions from Feinstein)

 

[basquebromance]

if it's a woman, he should pick Britt Grant or Barbara Lagoa. Amy Barrett is against the death penalty, i wouldn't pick her

Britt is a close friend of Kavanaugh and the youngest in Trump's list

Barbara is Cuban American, so it would be a historic pick

Potential SCOTUS pick Barbara Lagoa on Roe v Wade (to questions from Feinstein)

sounds good!

 

[basquebromance]

Tell MSNBC to stop covering the trump rally now and show the vigil for Ruth.

 

[Ropey]

if it's a woman, he should pick Britt Grant or Barbara Lagoa. Amy Barrett is against the death penalty, i wouldn't pick her

Britt is a close friend of Kavanaugh and the youngest in Trump's list

Barbara is Cuban American, so it would be a historic pick

Potential SCOTUS pick Barbara Lagoa on Roe v Wade (to questions from Feinstein)

sounds good!

Yes, as soon as I heard that Ruth had passed on, I thought the same thing.

Now let's see what happens.

 

[basquebromance]

"There have been 19 SCOTUS nominations in an election year where the same party controlled the Senate and WH. All but two were confirmed"

 

[basquebromance]

 

[basquebromance]

Ginsburg In 2016: ‘Nothing In The Constitution’ Prevents Final Year SCOTUS Picks

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2016 said "nothing in the Constitution" prevents a president from appointing a nominee to fill a court seat.

dailycaller.com

 

[basquebromance]

"Never forget what they did to Kavanaugh. we owe the left nothing. FILL THE SEAT" - Sen Josh Hawley

 

[basquebromance]

 

[Ropey]

She's gone and her volume of work?

It's going to get 'Obama'd."

 

[Ropey]

Media celebrates Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's life, legacy

Across television and streaming services, the life and legacy of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is already front and center

www.independent.co.uk

Sure they do... but they don't see what's coming.

 

[basquebromance]

RBG's classmates detested her, because she was always the first in her class

 

[iceberg]

as far as what the left will historically do - i give you -

The Democrats and SCOTUS: The Real Record

The muckraking, character-assassinating, ‘get-him-at-any-costs’ circus that Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation has devolved into is, sadly, the entirely predictable latest chapter of a book that repeats itself when a Republican presiden...

www.americanthinker.com

so don't give me this "not fair" crap. while i would 100% prefer we make a rule for when the president can and can't nominate someone, the simple fact is without a rule, he can do it "whenever"

so we either come together and create a law that says when the president will not be able to select a SCOTUS or we live with the way it is.

but the constant bitching at the right for dirty tactics doesn't really hold water when you look at the history here, does it? the only constant is the left is an asshole to every single conservative pick.

 

[basquebromance]

Fleetwood Mac's stevie nicks posthumously inducts rbg into the rock & roll hall of fame. a sentence my brain isn’t quite ready to compute just yet.

 

[basquebromance]

“You’ll regret this, and you may regret this a lot sooner than you think."- Mitch McConnell to Dems in 2013 after filibuster rule change.

 

[basquebromance]

'Use My Words Against Me': Lindsey Graham's Shifting Position On Court Vacancies

Before he chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee, the South Carolina senator said a Supreme Court vacancy shouldn't be filled during an election year. His position has changed.

www.npr.org