Roe v. Wade was wrong and so is the SCOTUS.

The constitution absolutely has a POV. If it didn't then it wouldn't exist dummy. I'm not going to indulge your wrongheaded opinion. Believe what you wish.
As can you. Educated adults know there is no Constitutional provision for individuals to receive welfare from the federal government, and free healthcare would be individual welfare.
 
If you really cared you would carry the child to term for the female that doesn't want the parasite in her. Have you volunteered to do that?
According to the thought of a fetus being a parasite, everyone in the whole world is remanded to be a mature parasite. That impression among youth could cause a rise in serial.kiillers. Scary.
 
Wrong.

Prior to birth, an embryo/fetus is not entitled to Constitutional protections:

‘…an abortion is not "the termination of life entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection." Id., at 159. From this holding, there was no dissent, see id., at 173; indeed, no member of the Court has ever questioned this fundamental proposition. Thus, as a matter of federal constitutional law, a developing organism that is not yet a "person" does not have what is sometimes described as a "right to life." [n.2] This has been and, by the Court's holding today, remains a fundamental premise of our constitutional law governing reproductive autonomy.’

The Unborn Victims of Violence Act (2004) establishes that unborn babies are members of the species at all stages of development and can be victims of violent crimes, thereby implicitly establishing their personhood and therefore their right to life. But the right to life under the 14th amendment protects us from criminal violence and abuses of power, not from the use of deadly force in self defense.
 

Forum List

Back
Top