Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We are way past that point in the discussion. And there is no substance to your contention. Life is life. The right to life ought to encompass the preborn.All encompassed Legal rights come after you have been birthed, ....after you are born.
No. It isn’t.That's just the way it is,
and has to be....
No support for your opinion.in the legal sense...imo.
Finally! An answer.NFBW: My Answer to BackAgain Question BAQ001 Is as follows 7797 7801 7809 7835
BackAgain230319-#7,801 to: -4 Why shouldn’t a society act upon its own hierarchy of values without concern for any historical so-called “common law” ?
NFBW230319-#7,809 to: -8 We live in a multicultural society where we all have freedom of conscience. There is no ‘hierarchy of values” that each American will use as a moral compass. If it exists please tell me all about
Nope. See prior response, above.BackAgain BAQ001 Why shouldn’t a society act upon its own hierarchy of values without concern for any historical so-called “common law” ?
NFBW answer to BAQ001.a.1 Because we live in a multicultural society where we all have individual freedom of conscience.
Yes there is and of course it exists. You may choose not to agree that life is the value at the apex, but if you act on it, society will advise you how wrong you are. There is a reason that murder is a major felony and littering isn’t.NFBW answer to BAQ001.b.1 There is no ‘hierarchy of values” that each American will use as a moral compass. If it exists please tell me all about it.
NFBW: Please reply to BAQ001.a.1 separately in a single post.
NFBW: Please reply to BAQ001.b.1 separately in a single post. And please follow up on my request for action in Bold format,
END2303210810
I haven’t used tricks you whining sissy.NFBW: see post #7,835
I will assign code numbers to each question you ask from here on out so that you cannot use this one of your tricks evermore.
thank you END2303210815
I am not arguing that it doesFreedom of conscience doesn’t trump the right to life.
NFBW: My conscience is based upon reason not revelation, therefore I make a distinction between life prior to first breath and after first breath as many law abiding moral Jewish Americans do based on revelation.Actually, you have been doing exactly that
That’s fine. But life remains life regardless of the distinction you draw.NFBW: My conscience is based upon reason not revelation, therefore I make a distinction between life prior to first breath and after first breath
Irrelevant.as many law abiding moral Jewish Americans do based on revelation.
Stop lying. You support the so-called “right” of “choice” for a woman to snuff out the life of the preborn human over the right of that preborn life to live. You support abortion.So you are a liar because I do not endorse any suggestion or insist or desire that my freedom of conscience trumps the right to life of any human life on the human lifespan continuum from conception until death.
You need to quit lying. Not just to me, but to yourself.If you think I do - refer to it or quit lying.
END2303211155
NFBW: Of course life remains life in two different legal realms according to the Constitution of the United States. There are those like you and I who have taken our first breath. There are those who have not.That’s fine. But life remains life regardless of the distinction you draw.
That’s not “of course.” It isn’t even true.NFBW: Of course life remains life in two different legal realms according to the Constitution of the United States.
There are those, like me, who are honest. And then there are those, like you, who are dishonest.There are those like you and I who have taken our first breath. There are those who have not.
When I fathered a child, twice in my life, my wife and I chose to grant the right and give them full life.
Nobody gives a shit about your reporsuxtivw abilities or disabilities. Not at all relevant to our discussion.Then I got fixed and thus have no interest in what other sexual partners do.
No. Again, society is perfectly well allowed to try to protect the lives of all.So if you are not Catholic but believe Catholic doctrine that abortion is some kind of sin against God or harms civilized society in some way - dont have sex unless you both agree to give a new life the opportunity to go the whole way to first breath. With everyone else you don’t know just mind your business - they do you no harm with any abortion they may get. Lead by example.
Stardate:21032023.75END2303211728
No. Again, society is perfectly well allowed to try to protect the lives of all.
Doesn't have to be, so what are you saying, otherwise that nothing can revert or be tweaked if a serious problem evolves ??? That's not the America I've known or have been a part of most of my life, otherwise if we develope a problem that most agree is a serious problem, then think God we aren't so rigid that we can't fix a problem, and then we are (at the least), smart enough to solve a problem just as it should be. Nothing is written in stone by us, so we have wiggle room when things go wrong.All encompassed Legal rights come after you have been birthed, ....after you are born. That's just the way it is, and has to be.... in the legal sense...imo.
You are engaged in a monologue with yourself - you avoided another question .Now, retracing much of our discussion,
As I keep telling you, your question is irrelevant. I understand that you don’t comprehend that fact.You are engaged in a monologue with yourself - you avoided another question .
NFBW: Do you deny BackAgain that the Constitution applies to citizens who are born / not to citizens who are conceived?
Of course, but government controlling women, their body, and their own decisions, is not one of those situations....Doesn't have to be, so what are you saying, otherwise that nothing can revert or be tweaked if a serious problem evolves ??? That's not the America I've known or have been a part of most of my life, otherwise if we develope a problem that most agree is a serious problem, then think God we aren't so rigid that we can't fix a problem, and then we are (at the least), smart enough to solve a problem just as it should be. Nothing is written in stone by us, so we have wiggle room when things go wrong.
Personal and medical decision? Your side tries it's best to clean up your dirty deeds with clean terms like Medical and parenthood etc.... No one is fooled by the bull shite anymore or rather if they ever were fooled by it.Of course, but government controlling women, their body, and their own decisions, is not one of those situations....
You don't trust government for anything, YET you insist the government is smart enough, and wise enough to make this personal and medical decision... for all wonen, in every circumstance....without knowing all individual circumstance, y'all got another thing coming.
