Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[Blisterfinger]

nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12680

i. hynrm 240909 Srvwgo12645
ii. nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12646
iii. hynrm 240909 Srvego12647
iv. nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12648
v. hynrm 240909 Srvwgo12649
vi. nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12651
vii. hynrm 240909 Srvego12652
viii. nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12653
ix. blstrfngr 240909 Srvwgo12654
xi. nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12655
xii. bjstrfngt 240909 Srvwgo12656
xiii. nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12657
xiv. blstrfngr 249721 Srvwgo12331
xv. nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12680


viii . Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 240909 {post•12653}. NotfooledbyW Sep’25 Vrvwgo: Abortion is legal and a Constitutional Right. nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12653. blstrfngr 249721 Srvwgo12331

xiv. Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 240721 {post•12331}. Blisterfinger Jul’24 Srvwgo: Trump didn't take away your abortion rights. blstrfngr 249721 Srvwgo12331

xv. Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 240909 {post•12680}.

NotfooledbyW Sep’24 Vrvwgo: We see that Saint_Blisterfinger in paragraph xiv. agrees with paragraph viii. that state Constitutions do not have to protect any living human organisms while in the womb and prior to birth. That means that a fetus does not have a right to life guaranteed in the US Constitution.

However the US Constitution does have a de facto “righ for women to terminate their pregnancy based on the fact that the unborn are not protected persons in our founding documents.

nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12680

Your dog has no rights specified in the Constitution. It is morally reprehensible if I killed it however. You are truly a vicious person

 

[NotfooledbyW]

dog

Blisterfinger said: Your dog has no rights specified in the Constitution. It is morally reprehensible if I killed it however. You are truly a vicious person. blstrfngrr 240909 Vrvwgo12681

My daughter had her first baby 14 months ago. She could’ve died two weeks before the baby was due. About two weeks before the due date my granddaughter had turned about halfway so she was sideways and very active and she caused the water to break at 3 AM in the morning. Fortunately, they live seven minutes from one of the best rated maternity hospitals in the country. When they arrived they were told they had about an hour or two to take my granddaughter out cesarean. However, at the same time, another woman arrived with an even worse potentially fatal condition and they decided to take her first. A then another surgical team got there within 15 or 20 minutes.

I’m telling you this because Saint_Heynorm and you are the most vicious and repugnant male human beings writing bullshit here because you both think it’s morally OK for a boyfriend to kidnap his girlfriend and force her to give birth while locked up in his basement or garage or someplace where she would have to give birth on her own,

You two are sick.

 

[daveman]

nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12644



vi . Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 240824 {post•12641 to Staerp00265}.
NotfooledbyW Sep’24 Vrvwgosaid: do (you) or do (you) not respect the ethical principles of other law abiding individuals nfbw 240908 Vrvwgo12641

vii . Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 240908 {post•12642 to 12641}. daveman Sep’24 Srvwgo: I am responsible for my words and my beliefs alone. dvmn 240908 Srvwgo12642

viii . Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 240908 {post•12644 to 12642}.

NotfooledbyW said: I didn’t ask you that. Will you answer the question as originally asked in paragraph vi.?

nfbw 240909 Vrvwgo12644

Let's see, stamping your feet doesn't seem to be working...I know! Maybe if you threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue! Yeah, that's bound to work!

 

[daveman]

Would somebody PLEASE tell NotfooledbyW he's the smartest guy in the room? That's all he wants to hear.

I would but I don't like to lie.

 

[HeyNorm]

Blisterfinger said: Your dog has no rights specified in the Constitution. It is morally reprehensible if I killed it however. You are truly a vicious person. blstrfngrr 240909 Vrvwgo12681

My daughter had her first baby 14 months ago. She could’ve died two weeks before the baby was due. About two weeks before the due date my granddaughter had turned about halfway so she was sideways and very active and she caused the water to break at 3 AM in the morning. Fortunately, they live seven minutes from one of the best rated maternity hospitals in the country. When they arrived they were told they had about an hour or two to take my granddaughter out cesarean. However, at the same time, another woman arrived with an even worse potentially fatal condition and they decided to take her first. A then another surgical team got there within 15 or 20 minutes.

I’m telling you this because Saint_Heynorm and you are the most vicious and repugnant male human beings writing bullshit here because you both think it’s morally OK for a boyfriend to kidnap his girlfriend and force her to give birth while locked up in his basement or garage or someplace where she would have to give birth on her own,

You two are sick.

You know as well as I know, he would be let go as he did what was needed to save his child from another who was threatening to kill it.

And, he could show proof that he was acting in the best interest of the child.

Your bullshit stories are nothing more than that,

 

[initforme]

You know as well as I know, he would be let go as he did what was needed to save his child from another who was threatening to kill it.

And, he could show proof that he was acting in the best interest of the child.

Your bullshit stories are nothing more than that,

It's in the hands ofveach states voters. That is a greaaaaaaaaast thing. Nobody can lose.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

You know as well as I know, he would be let go as he did what was needed to save his child from another who was threatening to kill it

Does this girlfriend have parents sisters brothers friends, co-workers Will be wondering why their loved ones suddenly disappeared with a boyfriend who is acting very strange.

 

[HeyNorm]

Does this girlfriend have parents sisters brothers friends, co-workers Will be wondering why their loved ones suddenly disappeared with a boyfriend who is acting very strange.

And when she came back, with a baby that would have otherwise been killed. They’d call him a hero, as would the girlfriend.

………….

And least we forget, here’s the hypothetical that had notfooledbyW all worked up.

I’ve heard this hypothetical before. Thoughts?

A man finds out his girlfriend is pregnant and has made an appointment to terminate the pregnancy.

He confronts her, telling her that he will support or raise the child and begs her not to abort it.

She confirms she is pregnant and that she is planning on terminating the pregnancy regardless of his pleading.

He kidnaps her and holds her against her will until the baby is born. The baby and mother are both healthy.

He returns the mother and child and turns himself in.

He is charged with the kidnapping but pleads innocent as he was only protecting his child.

 

[daveman]

And when she came back, with a baby that would have otherwise been killed. They’d call him a hero, as would the girlfriend.

Death cultists can't understand why anyone would value a clump of cells. Human life means nothing to them.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

women in Georgia can, for now, terminate unwanted and/or dangerous pregnancies up to 22 weeks.

nfbw 241001 Vdpxyz00174




https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/30/politics/georgia-abortion-ban/index.html

McBurney wrote, “a review of our higher courts’ interpretations of ‘liberty’ demonstrates that liberty in Georgia includes in its meaning, in its protections, and in its bundle of rights the power of a woman to control her own body, to decide what happens to it and in it, and to reject state interference with her healthcare choices.”

 

[HeyNorm]

women in Georgia can, for now, terminate unwanted and/or dangerous pregnancies up to 22 weeks.

nfbw 241001 Vdpxyz00174




https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/30/politics/georgia-abortion-ban/index.html

McBurney wrote, “a review of our higher courts’ interpretations of ‘liberty’ demonstrates that liberty in Georgia includes in its meaning, in its protections, and in its bundle of rights the power of a woman to control her own body, to decide what happens to it and in it, and to reject state interference with her healthcare choices.”

So don’t try to help female overdose victims. You’d be interfering with her “choice”. And that’s naughty.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

So don’t try to help female overdose victims. You’d be interfering with her “choice”. And that’s naughty.

A woman who is capable of doing that obviously has reached a stage of development beyond 22 weeks in the warm and was successful in being born.

Why are you so confused about that?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Is this a lock? I don’t know. But I’m so psyched to think that the ruling allowing slaughter of innocent life — sanctioned by the United States — is about to end.

“When a fetus growing inside a woman reaches viability, when society can assume care and responsibility for that separate life, then – and only then – may society intervene. An arbitrary six-week ban on (post-embryonic cardiac activity pregnancy) terminations is inconsistent with these rights and the proper balance that a viability rule establishes between a woman’s rights of liberty and privacy and society’s interest in protecting and caring for unborn infants,” McBurney wrote.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

That is great news if true.

Judge Robert McBurney wrote in his ruling.

skews13 inserts quote by a true liberty respecting judge: “Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote," Judge Robert McBurney.

 

[BackAgain]

“When a fetus growing inside a woman reaches viability, when society can assume care and responsibility for that separate life, then – and only then – may society intervene. An arbitrary six-week ban on (post-embryonic cardiac activity pregnancy) terminations is inconsistent with these rights and the proper balance that a viability rule establishes between a woman’s rights of liberty and privacy and society’s interest in protecting and caring for unborn infants,” McBurney wrote.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

nfbw 241001 Vrvwgo12696

Another unintelligible comment by adv033 Saint Backagain.

iii. Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 230127 {post•6929}

HeyNorm Jan’23 Srvwg: So, the newborn gains rights at birth, hynrm 230127 Srvwgo06929

NotfooledbyW Oct’24 Vrvwgo: A fetus has rights through the individual personhood rights of its potential birthmother. Those fetal rights never ever supersede the right to privacy and bodily autonomy if it’s a potential mother.

The following quote is an indictment of the six Catholics on the US Supreme Court’s unconstitutionally and dishonestly rendered a decision that deprive women of their rights for the sake of gratifying, a super religious electorate in some states.

skews13 inserts quote by a true liberty respecting judge: “Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote," Judge Robert McBurney.

nfbw 241001 Vrvwgo12696

 

[BackAgain]

nfbw 241001 Vrvwgo12696


Another unintelligible comment by adv033 Saint Backagain.

iii. Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 230127 {post•6929}

HeyNorm Jan’23 Srvwg: So, the newborn gains rights at birth, hynrm 230127 Srvwgo06929

NotfooledbyW Oct’24 Vrvwgo: A fetus has rights through the individual personhood rights of its potential birthmother. Those fetal rights never ever supersede the right to privacy and bodily autonomy if it’s a potential mother.

The following quote is an indictment of the six Catholics on the US Supreme Court’s unconstitutionally and dishonestly rendered a decision that deprive women of their rights for the sake of gratifying, a super religious electorate in some states.

skews13 inserts quote by a true liberty respecting judge: “Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote," Judge Robert McBurney.

nfbw 241001 Vrvwgo12696

FooledByKamalalala, the above quoted moron, thinks a yawn emoticon is “unintelligible.”

His real problem is that he is unintelligent.

 

[HeyNorm]

A woman who is capable of doing that obviously has reached a stage of development beyond 22 weeks in the warm and was successful in being born.

Why are you so confused about that?

Everyone has a right to make bad decisions. The honorable live with them and don’t harm others because of those decisions.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

The honorable live with them and don’t harm others because of those decisions.

When a woman decides to terminate her own pregnancy, she’s is not harming others.

What she decides to do with what’s happening inside her body is none of your fucking business.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

FooledByKamalalala, the above quoted moron, thinks a yawn emoticon is “unintelligible.”

I am still waiting for Saint Backagain to say something intelligent in response to the very intelligent paragraphs written below:

skews13 inserts quote by a true liberty respecting judge: “Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote," Judge Robert McBurney.

“When a fetus growing inside a woman reaches viability, when society can assume care and responsibility for that separate life, then – and only then – may society intervene. An arbitrary six-week ban on (post-embryonic cardiac activity pregnancy) terminations is inconsistent with these rights and the proper balance that a viability rule establishes between a woman’s rights of liberty and privacy and society’s interest in protecting and caring for unborn infants,” McBurney wrote