What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

NotfooledbyW

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
18,485
Reaction score
3,406
Points
245
you have a mother who is pregnant, and her unborn child is perfectly healthy, but then for some irresponsible reason that has been building up, she just decides that she doesn't want the child (a HUMAN being), that's growing inside of her, so she thinks to herself hmmmmmmmmmm ya know, I could get a so called procedure that would end the life of the child growing inside of my body.
NFBW: Why is what a woman decides to do about a collection of cells growing inside her body any of your business? END2209220953
 

NotfooledbyW

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
18,485
Reaction score
3,406
Points
245
NFBW: Why is what a woman decides to do about a collection of cells growing inside her body any of your business? END2209220953

NFBW: beagle9 Disagrees with a question which is absurd so I will ask again:

Why is what a woman decides to do about a collection of cells growing inside her body any of your business beagle9 ? END2209232104
 

beagle9

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
33,847
Reaction score
10,251
Points
1,400
NFBW: Why is what a woman decides to do about a collection of cells growing inside her body any of your business? END2209220953
Call it what you want Libby, and you can even join up with Stacey Abrams to suggest that the heartbeat is being manufactured by "the man" in hopes to control a woman's body. ROTFLMBO..

How damned ludicrous or a crock of bull crap is that ?? You ought to hold your head in shame for shilling for the Democrat's like you do.. Pathetic.

What about prostitution? You all have been allowing that to exist forever, but hey the next thing you know "her body" isn't her body, but rather it belongs to the State when they lock her ace up for selling that body.

Thought her body was her's, but it appears that it only belongs to her if she chooses to use it in a way that they might approve of. So if she decides to end the pregnancy in which harbor's a beautiful little child within, then the state back's her choice one hundred percent eh, but if she wants to sell her body, then it's off with her head eh ?? ROTFLMBO 😂
 

CarsomyrPlusSix

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Messages
643
Reaction score
426
Points
483
Call it what you want Libby, and you can even join up with Stacey Abrams to suggest that the heartbeat is being manufactured by "the man" in hopes to control a woman's body. ROTFLMBO..

How damned ludicrous or a crock of bull crap is that ?? You ought to hold your head in shame for shilling for the Democrat's like you do.. Pathetic.

What about prostitution? You all have been allowing that to exist forever, but hey the next thing you know "her body" isn't her body, but rather it belongs to the State when they lock her ace up for selling that body.

Thought her body was her's, but it appears that it only belongs to her if she chooses to use it in a way that they might approve of. So if she decides to end the pregnancy in which harbor's a beautiful little child within, then the state back's her choice one hundred percent eh, but if she wants to sell her body, then it's off with her head eh ?? ROTFLMBO 😂
The audacity of that inhuman devolved cancerous clump of cells with negative intelligence thinking itself superior to the unborn.

The answer to Clumpy’s question is that it is very much our business when anyone, man or woman, attacks and kills another human being in coldblooded aggression.

Clumpy may as well argue it “isn’t our business” if someone were to shoot Clumpy to death unprovoked, and yet, shitty as he is, vile as he is, Clumpy is still ostensibly a human being and Clumpy still has rights - even if its primary activity is to troll while abusing the first amendment right to free speech to call for killing others and violating their human right to life.
 

NotfooledbyW

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
18,485
Reaction score
3,406
Points
245
How damned ludicrous or a crock of bull crap is that ??

There remains this question anti-legal abortion crusader refuses to answer:

Why is what a woman decides to do about a collection of cells growing inside her body any of your business?

The question is why the refusal.
 

NotfooledbyW

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
18,485
Reaction score
3,406
Points
245
The answer to Clumpy’s question is that it is very much our business when anyone, man or woman, attacks and kills another human being in coldblooded aggression.


FACT (A) When you write “attacks and kills another human being” you are referring to two separate human beings are you not? PERSON ONE and PERSON TWO. An attacker and a victim.

FACT (B) One of the two human beings is a viable human being and the second human being involved is not a viable human being.

FACT (C) There is no act of murder when there is no murdered body of a once viable human being produced as evidence or credible proof that the second human being was viable and became part of the general human family of mankind.

A B and C means you beagle9 etc are making up an excuse and nonexistent crime of murder to make your invasion into the privacy of a newly impregnated woman your business. That is a fraudulent lie mostly based religion and it has severe consequences for viable human beings who cannot obtain medical services to prevent harm to themselves o
Up to and including loss of a viable human beings life.

END2209230026
 

NotfooledbyW

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
18,485
Reaction score
3,406
Points
245
if she decides to end the pregnancy in which harbor's a beautiful little child within,
No state or federal law recognizes a one cell zygote or limited cell fetus as a “beautiful little child” that can be murdered by a woman prior to a concept of it’s viability.

It is why ding wrote the following false statement:

Viability apart from its mother plays no role in that determination.

END2209240050
 

beagle9

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
33,847
Reaction score
10,251
Points
1,400
There remains this question anti-legal abortion crusader refuses to answer:

Why is what a woman decides to do about a collection of cells growing inside her body any of your business?

The question is why the refusal.
It should be anybody's business when the moral code's of mankind and nature are being broken. To sit back and do or say nothing is aching for chaos and mayhem to become the norm in what was once a CIVILIZED SOCIETY to a large degree.
 

beagle9

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
33,847
Reaction score
10,251
Points
1,400
No state or federal law recognizes a one cell zygote or limited cell fetus as a “beautiful little child” that can be murdered by a woman prior to a concept of it’s viability.

It is why ding wrote the following false statement:



END2209240050
Beautiful little child is referring to the little precious life that is growing beautifully within. How one thinks to just go down and have that life just snuffed out for one's selfish reasoning is a sickening thing. How a medical field graduate seeks to then accommodate such a thing, uhhh well is another sickening thing. Be pro-life, then you can't lose.
 

CarsomyrPlusSix

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Messages
643
Reaction score
426
Points
483
I see from your quotes that Clumpy still has no rebuttal for anything.

Oh well, guess I’m not missing out on anything by skipping out on that endless font of retardation.
 

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
2,352
Reaction score
519
Points
140
" More Impotence From Neophyte Trolls With Poor Education And Over Aggrandized Self Worth "

* Too Arrogant To Care And Too Stupid To Anticipate *

Overpopulation is a myth, and you’re just dumb enough to believe it. But you’re right on one thing - taxpayers shouldn’t be paying for any sex education or any education or any family planning.
The dullards are those who blubber about climate change , pollution , carrying capacity , extinction and limited resources without making a correlation between those and the gluttony of hue mammon over population in a closed system .

I may be correct about something but being right or left is piss poor diction as neither are valid connotations for correct or incorrect .

* Personality Disorders Of Wanna Be Dictators In Clown Suits *
You just want to cull the disabled, don’t you, you sicko?
The decision to proceed or to terminate a pregnancy based on fetal abnormalities is to be decided by the individual and not a bunch of sanctimonious haughty horror genre clowns .

* Go Brag About It To Mother Nature *
That’s probably because you’re retarded.
An afterlife , life to come , reincarnation , being born again , transmutation of soles , etc are metaphors with for passing on ones genetic identity through offspring so that another , both literally and figuratively as themselves , may have an opportunity to experience the sentience , sapience and introspection that is afforded as life , where failure to do so in perpetuity is ascribed the metaphors of final judgement and eternal damnation .

* Whatever You Say Punk Bitch Nobody *
You don’t know what that word means - your claim is patently absurd and laughably stupid.
Those who attend understand and it is a matter of time before enough have heard and know .

 
Last edited:

NotfooledbyW

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
18,485
Reaction score
3,406
Points
245
NFBW: BackAgain asks a rationally setup question and then irrationally mandates that we all accept the only answer per his conclusion.. Thr answer is no.

The following is a perfect example of the acceptance of irrationality by Conservative Americans fused to each other by the absolute irrationality of Trumpism, MAGA, Pro-Lifers, White Christian Nationalists, Stop-the-Steal Election Deniers, including Q-Anon.

BackAgain220422-#90 “I believe we have a disconnect. Just because the Constitution doesn’t say we have a right to privacy, doesn’t mean that there is no such thing as a right to privacy. If we say it is a corollary to our right to be secure in our own homes (a right we do have, explicitly), then I have no objection to a claim that a right to privacy may be Constitutionally protected. But that’s not the end of the inquiry.

At least one additional question comes to mind immediately if we have a right to be secure in our own homes, let’s ask: secure from whom or from what? I suggest that it was intended to mean “secure from government intrusion.” The Constitution can be resorted to against improper government acts (like a warrantless wiretap). Sure, we may have a right against invasion of that security (or privacy) by the actions of individuals, too. But the latter right isn’t a Constitutionally protected right. It is a lawful right. But the Constitution isn’t the right shield to address that latter violation.

This is akin to the right to free speech. The Government isn’t allowed to deny us our right to free speech (with some very limited exceptions). But that doesn’t mean that the idiots at Twitter can’t deny you free speech on their service.

So, let’s get back to abortion “rights.” To the extent that it is largely predicated on a “right” to “privacy,” and the right to privacy is part of some penumbra of our right to be secure in our persons and in our our homes, then do we have a right to murder a person in the privacy of our own homes? (By the way, the answer of clearly “no.”) “

END2209240751
 
Last edited:

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
2,352
Reaction score
519
Points
140
" Fails To Explain All Of Nature And Ignores The Messages From Its Maker"

* Apex Predator Wants To Disregard Basic Realities *

Beautiful little child is referring to the little precious life that is growing beautifully within. How one thinks to just go down and have that life just snuffed out for one's selfish reasoning is a sickening thing. How a medical field graduate seeks to then accommodate such a thing, uhhh well is another sickening thing. Be pro-life, then you can't lose.
Infanticide is disturbingly common in nature. It's typically committed by males that take over a pride or pack and kill whatever babies are present to make room for the ones they plan to father.

The explanation for such pitiless behavior is as cold as it is unavoidable: tamarin mothers are simply very good at balancing their genetic ledgers and know when they're heading for a loss. If they're raising babies that have a poor chance of surviving anyway, why make a pointless investment of time, resources and calories trying to keep them alive? Better to cut their losses, bag the babies and wait for a better season to breed.

When there were at least three assisting males in the troop, the researchers found, the survival rate for infants was an impressive 75%; when there were two or fewer males, the number fell to 42%. When a mother-to-be was the only gestating female in a group, the baby she gave birth to had an 80% chance of surviving at least three months. When there were two or more pregnancies, that forecast plunged to just 20%. "Births must be spaced by three months or more," the authors wrote, "in order to allow efficient helping behavior."
 

NotfooledbyW

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
18,485
Reaction score
3,406
Points
245
The audacity of that inhuman devolved cancerous clump of cells with negative intelligence thinking itself superior to the unborn.
NFBW: That is an excellent example of pro-life irrationality contained in a lie.

For documented evidence of MAGA Politics of irrationality Click Post #5,372 END2209240809
 

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
2,352
Reaction score
519
Points
140
" Empathy For The Inchoate "

* Inquiring Minds Want To Know *

It should be anybody's business when the moral code's of mankind and nature are being broken. To sit back and do or say nothing is aching for chaos and mayhem to become the norm in what was once a CIVILIZED SOCIETY to a large degree.
Oh due tell us , what is the moral code of nature ?
 

NotfooledbyW

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
18,485
Reaction score
3,406
Points
245
To sit back and do or say nothing is aching for chaos and mayhem to become the norm in what was once a CIVILIZED SOCIETY to a large degree.
NFBW: When a woman terminates her pregnancy in the privacy of her family and a medical professional there is no effect on the civilization of mankind because no viable “person” is intentionally and or legally being terminated. Why is it your business beagle9 ? What motivates you to stick your Christian nose into everybody else’s business when they cause no harm to you and no damage to civilization. An example of Damage to civilians and civilization was the US Invasion of Iraq in 2003. Did you protest in the streets as I did before Bush launched it? END2209240830
 

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
2,352
Reaction score
519
Points
140
" Moral Relativism Of Nature Versus Legal Positivism Of State Institution "

* Perspectivism For A Republic To Safeguard Individualism "

So, let’s get back to abortion “rights.” To the extent that it is largely predicated on a “right” to “privacy,” and the right to privacy is part of some penumbra of our right to be secure in our persons and in our our homes, then do we have a right to murder a person in the privacy of our own homes? (By the way, the answer of clearly “no.”) “
END2209240751
Though they were told for over 30 years that a wright to privacy was incidental and not principle to the basis for pro-choice public policy and for the basis of roe v wade decision , the pro-choice leadership remained complacent , arrogant and dismissive in refusing to adopt the actual constitutional basis that does not require stare decisis or precedent -
Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade .

To secure a position for a wright to privacy one must exclude / prohibit state interests by assuring equal protection of negative liberties - among those entitled by a birth requirement to receive it , and state interests are restricted to safety and security and not culpable to populism of democracy as tyranny by majority or tyranny by minority .

This should help -
 

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
2,352
Reaction score
519
Points
140
" Small Changes In Initial Conditions "

* Pet Peeve Crux Of Insufficient Vernacular *

NFBW: When a woman terminates her pregnancy in the privacy of her family and a medical professional there is no effect on the civilization of mankind because no viable “person” is intentionally and or legally being terminated. Why is it your business beagle9 ? What motivates you to stick your Christian nose into everybody else’s business when they cause no harm to you and no damage to civilization. An example of Damage to civilians and civilization was the US Invasion of Iraq in 2003. Did you protest in the streets as I did before Bush launched it? END2209240830
An etymology of the term per son indicates a meaning of countable by census and male .

By declaration of independence , all men are created equal , thereby surreptitiously implying that women are not , which is corroborated by us 19th amendment .

Thus by us 14th amendment , any person may become a citizen implies that women are not categorically citizens of the us .

The credo of republic is e pluribus unum that is based in individualism and a correct annotation to replace the term person is individual , that also clarifies the birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen .

The anti-choice traitors seek to usurp a birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen by modifying the definition of a per son in title 1 section 8 of us code to include the pre-born ,
 

beagle9

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
33,847
Reaction score
10,251
Points
1,400
" More Impotence From Neophyte Trolls With Poor Education And Over Aggrandized Self Worth "

* Too Arrogant To Care And Too Stupid To Anticipate *


The dullards are those who blubber about climate change , pollution , carrying capacity , extinction and limited resources without making a correlation between those and the gluttony of hue mammon over population in a closed system .

I may be correct about something but being right or left is piss poor diction as neither are valid connotations for correct or incorrect .

* Personality Disorders Of Wanna Be Dictators In Clown Suits *

The decision to proceed or to terminate a pregnancy based on fetal abnormalities is to be decided by the individual and not a bunch of sanctimonious haughty horror genre clowns .

* Go Brag About It To Mother Nature *

An afterlife , life to come , reincarnation , being born again , transmutation of soles , etc are metaphors with for passing on ones genetic identity through offspring so that another , both literally and figuratively as themselves , may have an opportunity to experience the sentience , sapience and introspection that is afforded as life , where failure to do so in perpetuity is ascribed the metaphors of final judgement and eternal damnation .

* Whatever You Say Punk Bitch Nobody *

Those who attend understand and it is a matter of time before enough have heard and know .

Your words above - The decision to proceed or to terminate pregnancy based on fetal abnormalities is to be decided by the individual and not a bunch of sanctimonious haughty horror genre clowns .

It is to be decided by the medical community in which the mother would happily agree if something is wrong.

Well if the radical leftist would have stayed inside their box regarding the matter of abnormalties, and regarding the danger to the mother in order to justify aborting the pregnancy, then intervention by rational minded people on the matter wouldn't have ever occurred. But the leftist Democrat party couldn't stand it, so they had to break into the outer boundaries of their screwed up thinking, and started taking something that was a medical procedure that was justified by the medical community when using it in a proper and ethical way as was needed, and they deformed it into something that became a sick and abused thing.
 

CarsomyrPlusSix

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Messages
643
Reaction score
426
Points
483
Your words above - The decision to proceed or to terminate pregnancy based on fetal abnormalities is to be decided by the individual and not a bunch of sanctimonious haughty horror genre clowns .

It is to be decided by the medical community in which the mother would happily agree if something is wrong.

Well if the radical leftist would have stayed inside their box regarding the matter of abnormalties, and regarding the danger to the mother in order to justify aborting the pregnancy, then intervention by rational minded people on the matter wouldn't have ever occurred. But the leftist Democrat party couldn't stand it, so they had to break into the outer boundaries of their screwed up thinking, and started taking something that was a medical procedure that was justified by the medical community when using it in a proper and ethical way as was needed, and they deformed it into something that became a sick and abused thing.
I’m sorry but I can’t stop laughing at the guy who calls human rights “Hue mammon wrights” enough to make a serious reply, but good for you for trying.

And like, realizing the guy is making an appeal to human rights while advocating for killing the disabled because of their disabilities, like then I realize this isn’t just a clown, this is an evil clown, twisted, and quite probably insane.

We shouldn’t kill any humans just because they’re going to die or because they have an abnormality. Everyone is different but we all have a human right to life that should not be violated, and it is violated when others attack and kill us.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$55.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top