Rittenhouse, Sandmann Agree To Share Joint Custody Of CNN

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
15,665
27,581
2,430
Rittenhouse, Sandmann Agree To Share Joint Custody Of CNN
19 Nov 2021
ATLANTA, GA—With Rittenhouse found "not guilty", media outlets across the country are preparing for costly defamation lawsuits after a year of calling him a white supremacist.
With CNN already half-owned by Nick Sandmann, the famous fake news organization will soon be giving the other half of its ownership over to Kyle Rittenhouse. The two have agreed to share joint custody.
"We would like to announce that our clients have come to an agreement to share custody of CNN," said Sandman and Rittenhouse's legal teams. "Sandmann will have custody on weekdays, with custody transferring over to Rittenhouse on holidays and weekends."
After the announcement, Rittenhouse began weeping upon realizing he was now a multimillionaire, while Sandmann smirked like a big MAGA hat-wearing jerkface.
Neither party has decided what to do with Brian Stelter, who may have to be put up for adoption.


Comment:
BB - you owe me a new keyboard. Coffee all over the place. Excellent....
Perhaps Rittenhouse may also end up owning the Delaware homes of the former VP and now president too.
 
Rittenhouse, Sandmann Agree To Share Joint Custody Of CNN
19 Nov 2021
ATLANTA, GA—With Rittenhouse found "not guilty", media outlets across the country are preparing for costly defamation lawsuits after a year of calling him a white supremacist.
With CNN already half-owned by Nick Sandmann, the famous fake news organization will soon be giving the other half of its ownership over to Kyle Rittenhouse. The two have agreed to share joint custody.
"We would like to announce that our clients have come to an agreement to share custody of CNN," said Sandman and Rittenhouse's legal teams. "Sandmann will have custody on weekdays, with custody transferring over to Rittenhouse on holidays and weekends."
After the announcement, Rittenhouse began weeping upon realizing he was now a multimillionaire, while Sandmann smirked like a big MAGA hat-wearing jerkface.
Neither party has decided what to do with Brian Stelter, who may have to be put up for adoption.


Comment:
BB - you owe me a new keyboard. Coffee all over the place. Excellent....
Perhaps Rittenhouse may also end up owning the Delaware homes of the former VP and now president too.
Why does CNN keep trying to destroy the lives of teenagers?
 
Rittenhouse, Sandmann Agree To Share Joint Custody Of CNN
19 Nov 2021
ATLANTA, GA—With Rittenhouse found "not guilty", media outlets across the country are preparing for costly defamation lawsuits after a year of calling him a white supremacist.
With CNN already half-owned by Nick Sandmann, the famous fake news organization will soon be giving the other half of its ownership over to Kyle Rittenhouse. The two have agreed to share joint custody.
"We would like to announce that our clients have come to an agreement to share custody of CNN," said Sandman and Rittenhouse's legal teams. "Sandmann will have custody on weekdays, with custody transferring over to Rittenhouse on holidays and weekends."
After the announcement, Rittenhouse began weeping upon realizing he was now a multimillionaire, while Sandmann smirked like a big MAGA hat-wearing jerkface.
Neither party has decided what to do with Brian Stelter, who may have to be put up for adoption.


Comment:
BB - you owe me a new keyboard. Coffee all over the place. Excellent....
Perhaps Rittenhouse may also end up owning the Delaware homes of the former VP and now president too.
Nothing like the sense of humor of a veteran.
Embrace the suck.
 
Leftists Question Rittenhouse Verdict
20 Nov 2021 ~~ By John Semmens
MSNBC "MTP Daily" host Chuck Todd expressed dismay that Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted in his trial for shooting three people during a riot in Kenosha last year. "I can understand how a teenager like Rittenhouse might feel endangered when a guy tried to club him with a skateboard or pointed a pistol at him," Todd admitted. "From a narrow perspective, it might be self-defense for him to shoot to save his life. But from a broader perspective, is society better off because he did? What message did the jury's verdict send?"
"If Rittenhouse had withheld his fire the worst that could've happened is that he could've been killed," Todd reasoned. "But two other people would've lived. Why didn't the jury weigh those odds? By acquitting him has the jury emboldened others to imitate his actions? Did they consider the possible public violence that may follow from those disappointed in the verdict?"
MSNBC commentator Joyce Vance wondered "whether we will be safer after this verdict? Had it gone the other way the message would have been clearer—don't attempt to take personal action to protect property and people from rioters. Rittenhouse put himself in danger by trying to do just that. I mean, if the powers that be—the mayor and the police—are content to let the looting and burning be, then so should everyone else. But I fear that such a common sense approach will not be possible if interlopers are allowed to take whatever action they please without consequence."
House Judiciary Committee Chair Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) demanded that the DOJ "find some federal crime Rittenhouse can be can be charged with. The asserted archaic individual right of self-defense must yield to the progressive right of the people to collectively pursue social justice. The men Rittenhouse shot were attempting to burn down Kenosha in protest over the police shooting of Jacob Blake. At the very least, Rittenhouse is guilty of infringing their First Amendment right to air their grievances."
Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) complained that "Rittenhouse killed two people who had assembled to affirm the value, dignity, and worth of black lives by attempting to chase him down and beat the crap out of him. He should've have taken his beating like a man. Instead, he shot them and asked for mercy on the witness stand. A white supremacist jury heard his plea and let him go free. Now there will be no justice for Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber."
President Biden professed himself "angry and concerned" about the not guilty verdict while pointing out that "there are still many buildings that weren't burned down last year" and called for "more peaceful protests.

Comment:
Kudos .... Another excellent satire aimed at the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies in D.C. and the Biased Quisling Media complex..
Meanwhile Antifa demonstrated in NYC, but remained docile because Mayor De Blasio wants to spend Thanksgiving in the Dominican Republic.
 
1637415490403.png
 
After Rittenhouse's lawyers get through suing CNN and WAPO, will Nick Sandman and Kyle Rittenhouse end up owning both?
Hmm...., can you imagine the confusion and discord at both companies now owned by conservatives that would now require honest and fair reporting?
 
Rittenhouse, Sandmann Agree To Share Joint Custody Of CNN
19 Nov 2021
ATLANTA, GA—With Rittenhouse found "not guilty", media outlets across the country are preparing for costly defamation lawsuits after a year of calling him a white supremacist.
With CNN already half-owned by Nick Sandmann, the famous fake news organization will soon be giving the other half of its ownership over to Kyle Rittenhouse. The two have agreed to share joint custody.
"We would like to announce that our clients have come to an agreement to share custody of CNN," said Sandman and Rittenhouse's legal teams. "Sandmann will have custody on weekdays, with custody transferring over to Rittenhouse on holidays and weekends."
After the announcement, Rittenhouse began weeping upon realizing he was now a multimillionaire, while Sandmann smirked like a big MAGA hat-wearing jerkface.
Neither party has decided what to do with Brian Stelter, who may have to be put up for adoption.


Comment:
BB - you owe me a new keyboard. Coffee all over the place. Excellent....
Perhaps Rittenhouse may also end up owning the Delaware homes of the former VP and now president too.
:yes_text12:
 

Forum List

Back
Top