Rittenhouse not guilty???? Change the laws!!!

[M14 Shooter]

Example:

After Rittenhouse verdict, it's time to question the law | CNN

If Rittenhouse had exercised better judgment and decided not to go to Kenosha that night, Rosenbaum and Huber would almost certainly still be alive. But in Wisconsin, that initial decision, as poor a decision as it was, does not constitute a crime, and the jury found his later actions justified.

www.cnn.com

Like almost every other time something doesn't go their way, the left wants to change the rules to reflect what they think reality should have been.

Ok. Fine.
Here's the WI law on self-defense:

Wisconsin Legislature: 939.48

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

Specifically, what would you change?
What specific language would you use in its place?
What is your rational basis for your changes?
What are the benefits of these changes?
What problems might they cause?

 

[eagle7-31]

Example:

After Rittenhouse verdict, it's time to question the law | CNN

If Rittenhouse had exercised better judgment and decided not to go to Kenosha that night, Rosenbaum and Huber would almost certainly still be alive. But in Wisconsin, that initial decision, as poor a decision as it was, does not constitute a crime, and the jury found his later actions justified.

www.cnn.com

Like almost every other time something doesn't go their way, the left wants to change the rules to reflect what they think reality should have been.

Ok. Fine.
Here's the WI law on self-defense:

Wisconsin Legislature: 939.48

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

Specifically, what would you change?
What is your rational basis for your changes?
What are the benefits of these changes?
What problems might they cause?

None of this would have happened in Wisconsin last year if the dumb ass Governor and local officials had the streets properly patrolled by police and NG,

 

[M14 Shooter]

None of this would have happened in Wisconsin last year if the dumb ass Governor and local officials had the streets properly patrolled by police and NG,

True, but not the issue at hand..

 

[Auld Phart]

Example:

After Rittenhouse verdict, it's time to question the law | CNN

If Rittenhouse had exercised better judgment and decided not to go to Kenosha that night, Rosenbaum and Huber would almost certainly still be alive. But in Wisconsin, that initial decision, as poor a decision as it was, does not constitute a crime, and the jury found his later actions justified.

www.cnn.com

Like almost every other time something doesn't go their way, the left wants to change the rules to reflect what they think reality should have been.

Ok. Fine.
Here's the WI law on self-defense:

Wisconsin Legislature: 939.48

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

Specifically, what would you change?
What specific language would you use in its place?
What is your rational basis for your changes?
What are the benefits of these changes?
What problems might they cause?

Multiple Threads On Rittenhouse.


Add This Comment To One Of Them