Riots in the 1960's

[peach174]

These are the very same people that is in the house and senate right now and are Liberal Dem's.
Lead by Al Sharpton and Rev. Jackson back in the 60's

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzEX1GzS_-c]WASHINGTON, D.C. ENGINE CO. 4, "1960's" - YouTube[/ame]

The film is taken from actual footage of the devastation but the music is War that hit the charts in 1970.

Why do you Dem's want these hateful people representing you?
All they have ever wanted is power and control over you.

 

[Ravi]

Are you telling us that you're going to assassinate Obama?

 

[peach174]

Are you telling us that you're going to assassinate Obama?

do you even have a brain at all?

 

[toxicmedia]

These are the very same people that is in the house and senate right now and are Liberal Dem's.
Lead by Al Sharpton and Rev. Jackson back in the 60's

WASHINGTON, D.C. ENGINE CO. 4, "1960's" - YouTube

The film is taken from actual footage of the devastation but the music is War that hit the charts in 1970.

Why do you Dem's want these hateful people representing you?
All they have ever wanted is power and control over you.

The 60's was a time in which young peope rebelled against the 50's style repression of women, minorites, and goody goody morality. It was naive...but they weren't hateful, controlling, evil people.

I think that conservative media has taken it's toll on your objectivity and ability to understand the motives of the people you think are terrible.

People are people....every group of ten people, in any place on the earth are the same. There will be 5 ordinary people who just want to work and live, 1 criminal, 1 saint, 1 leader, 1 dreamer, and 1 loser.

 

[Ravi]

Are you telling us that you're going to assassinate Obama?

do you even have a brain at all?

Yes, but apparently you don't.

Those riots were a reaction to the assassination of MLK.

Maybe you should try to explain your point a little better.

And then explain who in congress was involved in the riots.

 

[Nosmo King]

While those on the Right sit and wring their hands over some potential civil unrest, they have forgotten the motivations for the unrest of the 1960s. One motivation was the lack of civil rights protection. It seems there were social conservatives in the south unwilling to loose the reigns of power and grant African Americans the simple civil rights we take for granted today.

Another motivation was the draft. The meat grinder that was Vietnam took some of the best and brightest away to fight in that protracted and ultimately unwinnable war. Imagine if we had a draftee military today. Would people sit back and be as relatively indifferent to the two, protracted and ultimately unwinnable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan after ten years of combat and loss?

 

[peach174]

They were destructive rioters that destroyed public and private property and are now your wonderful controller's, that has destroyed this nation with their unsustainable social programs
I am talking about all socialists be they Repubs or Dems.

I watched that on TV when it actually happened and it had nothing to do with conservative media of today.

They have never been peaceful protesters and have always been dividers of Americans by labels.
And their destruction of property did not end the Viet Nam War. The fall of Saigon did.

 

[konradv]

The riots weren't led by anyone. They just happened. Back then niether Jackson nor Sharpton were leaders, anyway. So the OP is an EPIC FAIL!!!

 

[Ravi]

They were destructive rioters that destroyed public and private property and are now your wonderful controller's, that has destroyed this nation with their unsustainable social programs
I am talking about all socialists be they Repubs or Dems.

I watched that on TV when it actually happened and it had nothing to do with conservative media of today.

They have never been peaceful protesters and have always been dividers of Americans by labels.
And their destruction of property did not end the Viet Nam War. The fall of Saigon did.

You claimed current members of congress were involved in the riots. Who?

 

[2twsted4colorTV]

While those on the Right sit and wring their hands over some potential civil unrest, they have forgotten the motivations for the unrest of the 1960s. One motivation was the lack of civil rights protection. It seems there were social conservatives in the south unwilling to loose the reigns of power and grant African Americans the simple civil rights we take for granted today.

Another motivation was the draft. The meat grinder that was Vietnam took some of the best and brightest away to fight in that protracted and ultimately unwinnable war. Imagine if we had a draftee military today. Would people sit back and be as relatively indifferent to the two, protracted and ultimately unwinnable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan after ten years of combat and loss?

Those conservatives you speak of back in the 60s were Democrats. They couldn't keep the Civil Rights law from passing so now they are attempting to control the blacks by convincing them they can't be successful and they need THEM (the Democrats) to take care of them. The blacks who ignore this advice and make something of themselves are Republican.

 

[Ravi]

Oh, I get it now.

Just another thread to bash black people.

 

[shintao]

These are the very same people that is in the house and senate right now and are Liberal Dem's.
Lead by Al Sharpton and Rev. Jackson back in the 60's

WASHINGTON, D.C. ENGINE CO. 4, "1960's" - YouTube

The film is taken from actual footage of the devastation but the music is War that hit the charts in 1970.

Why do you Dem's want these hateful people representing you?
All they have ever wanted is power and control over you.

What is your point? That people that protest deaths in war are hateful? Funny how the names attached to them were flower children, hippies, love children. Why was that?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Im sending this thread to G4 for their Epic Fail segment

 

[Nosmo King]

While those on the Right sit and wring their hands over some potential civil unrest, they have forgotten the motivations for the unrest of the 1960s. One motivation was the lack of civil rights protection. It seems there were social conservatives in the south unwilling to loose the reigns of power and grant African Americans the simple civil rights we take for granted today.

Another motivation was the draft. The meat grinder that was Vietnam took some of the best and brightest away to fight in that protracted and ultimately unwinnable war. Imagine if we had a draftee military today. Would people sit back and be as relatively indifferent to the two, protracted and ultimately unwinnable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan after ten years of combat and loss?

Those conservatives you speak of back in the 60s were Democrats. They couldn't keep the Civil Rights law from passing so now they are attempting to control the blacks by convincing them they can't be successful and they need THEM (the Democrats) to take care of them. The blacks who ignore this advice and make something of themselves are Republican.

There's a difference between political party and political ideology. Don't hide behind the skirts of party when ideology betrays the truth. Conservatives have never NEVER advocated social progress for all Americans. there's always ALWAYS an excluded group.. Women, minorities, gays, it's a matter of historical fact.

 

[peach174]

No I am talking about Liberals, all of them, of all colors.
The clip is just one of many riots and they are your wonderfu leaders of today.
They were hateful destructive people then, just like they are now.
They went the house and senate and totally changed the constution to an overblown monster of a government who gives out entitlemnents in order for you to keep voting for them.

 

[Ravi]

No I am talking about Liberals, all of them, of all colors.
The clip is just one of many riots and they are your wonderfu leaders of today.
They were hateful destructive people then, just like they are now.
They went the house and senate and totally changed the constution to an overblown monster of a government who gives out entitlemnents in order for you to keep voting for them.

The clip you posted was from the riots that happened because MLK was murdered.

You stupid bitch. Negged.

 

[toxicmedia]

No I am talking about Liberals, all of them, of all colors.
The clip is just one of many riots and they are your wonderfu leaders of today.
They were hateful destructive people then, just like they are now.
They went the house and senate and totally changed the constution to an overblown monster of a government who gives out entitlemnents in order for you to keep voting for them.

Man alive....you gotta lay off the Glenn Beck!.......

 

[peach174]

The riots weren't led by anyone. They just happened. Back then niether Jackson nor Sharpton were leaders, anyway. So the OP is an EPIC FAIL!!!

They certainly were, they both took over after Martin Luther King died and totally changed what Dr. King intended.

 

[peach174]

No I am talking about Liberals, all of them, of all colors.
The clip is just one of many riots and they are your wonderful leaders of today.
They were hateful destructive people then, just like they are now.
They went the house and senate and totally changed the Constitution to an overblown monster of a government who gives out entitlements in order for you to keep voting for them.

Man alive....you gotta lay off the Glenn Beck!.......

Perfect example of the left. Labeling.
I don't watch or listen to Glenn or Rush.
I formed these opinions when all of the destruction was happing at the time during the 60's.
Our constitution says for the right of the people to peacefully assemble to petition the government.
Not to riot and destroy public property.

 

[toxicmedia]

No I am talking about Liberals, all of them, of all colors.
The clip is just one of many riots and they are your wonderful leaders of today.
They were hateful destructive people then, just like they are now.
They went the house and senate and totally changed the Constitution to an overblown monster of a government who gives out entitlements in order for you to keep voting for them.

Man alive....you gotta lay off the Glenn Beck!.......

Perfect example of the left. Labeling.
I don't watch or listen to Glenn or Rush.
I formed these opinions when all of the destruction was happing at the time during the 60's.
Our constitution says for the right of the people to peacefully assemble to petition the government.
Not to riot and destroy public property.

I lived through the 60's here in northern California. I saw riots...Black Panther demonstrations....and I haven't formed a hatred for Democrats. In fact...I don't hate Republicans either. I won't let the media turn me into an angry hater.

I'm not on the left. I'm a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian.

If you don't watch Glenn Beck...and you started thinking this way in the 60's....you should sue Glenn Beck for palagiarizing you. Your stuff is identical to what he is making huge bucks off from. You could have made millions on Fox News...