Right-To-Lifers Are Finally Getting It

PP has historically been at the forefront of stopping unwanted pregnancies and STDs. This organization makes abortion available as a last resort, not a first option.

Why these johnny-come-lately efforts by people calling themselves Christians? These "Christians" have been at the forefront of keeping people, particularly girls, ignorant about their bodies, about sexuality itself, and about contraception.

Abstinence education was the most stupid idea to hit the streets in a long time, but the "abstinence only" bimbos who call themselves "Christians" made millions off of the American taxpayer by pushing it, including people who have been placed by trump on the federal government payroll, all the while sacrificing girls and women so that they could deliver unspoiled meat to fundie men with certain sexual predilections.

Women and girls need good, practical advice, backed by solid medical findings, on their issues relating to sexuality and reproductive choices. They should never turn to people who call themselves "Christians" since these people have proven themselves untrustworthy and, well, liars. PP has been reliable all along.
I think you have utterly failed to comprehend the OP.

I did comprehend the OP. But those who now call themselves "Christians" long ago sacrificed their credibility. I'm just saying that care by Christians is fine for a male or a female who is not of fertile age. But if one is a female of fertile age, be careful, avoid them, and get your care elsewhere. Do not bet your body and your future on these "Christians."
 
PP has historically been at the forefront of stopping unwanted pregnancies and STDs. This organization makes abortion available as a last resort, not a first option.

Why these johnny-come-lately efforts by people calling themselves Christians? These "Christians" have been at the forefront of keeping people, particularly girls, ignorant about their bodies, about sexuality itself, and about contraception.

Abstinence education was the most stupid idea to hit the streets in a long time, but the "abstinence only" bimbos who call themselves "Christians" made millions off of the American taxpayer by pushing it, including people who have been placed by trump on the federal government payroll, all the while sacrificing girls and women so that they could deliver unspoiled meat to fundie men with certain sexual predilections.

Women and girls need good, practical advice, backed by solid medical findings, on their issues relating to sexuality and reproductive choices. They should never turn to people who call themselves "Christians" since these people have proven themselves untrustworthy and, well, liars. PP has been reliable all along.
I think you have utterly failed to comprehend the OP.

I did comprehend the OP. But those who now call themselves "Christians" long ago sacrificed their credibility. I'm just saying that care by Christians is fine for a male or a female who is not of fertile age. But if one is a female of fertile age, be careful, avoid them, and get your care elsewhere. Do not bet your body and your future on these "Christians."
The clinics in the OP "offer a full array of medical services, to include testing for sexually transmitted diseases, first-trimester prenatal care and contraception choices."

Everything PP does, without abortions.

So they should receive federal funds just like PP does.
 
S
PP has historically been at the forefront of stopping unwanted pregnancies and STDs. This organization makes abortion available as a last resort, not a first option.

Why these johnny-come-lately efforts by people calling themselves Christians? These "Christians" have been at the forefront of keeping people, particularly girls, ignorant about their bodies, about sexuality itself, and about contraception.

Abstinence education was the most stupid idea to hit the streets in a long time, but the "abstinence only" bimbos who call themselves "Christians" made millions off of the American taxpayer by pushing it, including people who have been placed by trump on the federal government payroll, all the while sacrificing girls and women so that they could deliver unspoiled meat to fundie men with certain sexual predilections.

Women and girls need good, practical advice, backed by solid medical findings, on their issues relating to sexuality and reproductive choices. They should never turn to people who call themselves "Christians" since these people have proven themselves untrustworthy and, well, liars. PP has been reliable all along.


PP is acorn.
So? Even if whatever you are saying is true, so what? I'm just warning people so that people do not innocently fall into the hands of people who claim to provide care but are ideologically motivated.
 
S
PP has historically been at the forefront of stopping unwanted pregnancies and STDs. This organization makes abortion available as a last resort, not a first option.

Why these johnny-come-lately efforts by people calling themselves Christians? These "Christians" have been at the forefront of keeping people, particularly girls, ignorant about their bodies, about sexuality itself, and about contraception.

Abstinence education was the most stupid idea to hit the streets in a long time, but the "abstinence only" bimbos who call themselves "Christians" made millions off of the American taxpayer by pushing it, including people who have been placed by trump on the federal government payroll, all the while sacrificing girls and women so that they could deliver unspoiled meat to fundie men with certain sexual predilections.

Women and girls need good, practical advice, backed by solid medical findings, on their issues relating to sexuality and reproductive choices. They should never turn to people who call themselves "Christians" since these people have proven themselves untrustworthy and, well, liars. PP has been reliable all along.


PP is acorn.
So? Even if whatever you are saying is true, so what? I'm just warning people so that people do not innocently fall into the hands of people who claim to provide care but are ideologically motivated.

You really narrowed the woman's choice down there to options she may not be able to afford.
 
PP has historically been at the forefront of stopping unwanted pregnancies and STDs. This organization makes abortion available as a last resort, not a first option.

Why these johnny-come-lately efforts by people calling themselves Christians? These "Christians" have been at the forefront of keeping people, particularly girls, ignorant about their bodies, about sexuality itself, and about contraception.

Abstinence education was the most stupid idea to hit the streets in a long time, but the "abstinence only" bimbos who call themselves "Christians" made millions off of the American taxpayer by pushing it, including people who have been placed by trump on the federal government payroll, all the while sacrificing girls and women so that they could deliver unspoiled meat to fundie men with certain sexual predilections.

Women and girls need good, practical advice, backed by solid medical findings, on their issues relating to sexuality and reproductive choices. They should never turn to people who call themselves "Christians" since these people have proven themselves untrustworthy and, well, liars. PP has been reliable all along.
I think you have utterly failed to comprehend the OP.

I did comprehend the OP. But those who now call themselves "Christians" long ago sacrificed their credibility. I'm just saying that care by Christians is fine for a male or a female who is not of fertile age. But if one is a female of fertile age, be careful, avoid them, and get your care elsewhere. Do not bet your body and your future on these "Christians."
The clinics in the OP "offer a full array of medical services, to include testing for sexually transmitted diseases, first-trimester prenatal care and contraception choices."

Everything PP does, without abortions.

So they should receive federal funds just like PP does.

PP doesn't receive federal funds. Sex-boy (mr. ED) pigpence took care of that.

Why should the availability of an abortion be the difference between receiving federal funds or not, anyway?
 
I’m also pro-life – indeed, everyone’s pro-life.

I also recognize the right to privacy and the necessary, proper and Constitutional limits that right places on the state prohibiting government from interfering in personal, private decisions – such as whether to have a child or not.

Roe v. Wade is much more than just about abortion – as the progeny of Griswold and Eisenstadt, Roe is a logical, consistent, and warranted ruling further safeguarding the privacy rights of citizens.

Overturning Roe would be both reckless and irresponsible, further increasing the size and authority of the state at the expense of individual liberty.

Affording men and women birth control therapies that prevent unwanted pregnancy should be the goal, not seeking to compel women to give birth against their will through force of law.

The Christian right and other social conservatives should refrain from their propensity for authoritarianism and instead focus their efforts to establish more healthcare providers as outlined in the OP.
You can't be pro-abortion and pro-life. You are promoting abortion which is solving a "problem" with death.

If women are being force to give birth, are they also being forced to become pregnant? Remove the option of abortion and you will see women taking birth control more seriously.

Legalizing abortion in the first place was immense government overreach. There is nothing in the Constitution which give anyone the right to kill and unborn human.

"Save, legal and rare" has gotten over 63 million lives snuffed out since Roe v. Wade.

And Roe v. Wade isn't about deciding to "have a child or not," it's about deciding to kill your child in the womb. It's not about a medical procedure, it's not about privacy, it's about death. Stop the deaths of the innocent.
 
I’m also pro-life – indeed, everyone’s pro-life.

I also recognize the right to privacy and the necessary, proper and Constitutional limits that right places on the state prohibiting government from interfering in personal, private decisions – such as whether to have a child or not.

Roe v. Wade is much more than just about abortion – as the progeny of Griswold and Eisenstadt, Roe is a logical, consistent, and warranted ruling further safeguarding the privacy rights of citizens.

Overturning Roe would be both reckless and irresponsible, further increasing the size and authority of the state at the expense of individual liberty.

Affording men and women birth control therapies that prevent unwanted pregnancy should be the goal, not seeking to compel women to give birth against their will through force of law.

The Christian right and other social conservatives should refrain from their propensity for authoritarianism and instead focus their efforts to establish more healthcare providers as outlined in the OP.
If our gov't is not first and foremost duty bound to protect the lives of the innocents it really serves no purpose of any value.

There's no other circumstance in which a perverted, fabricated "right to privacy" justifies the killing of another human being and that's exactly what happens with every successful abortion.
 
You can't be pro-abortion and pro-life. You are promoting abortion which is solving a "problem" with death.

If women are being force to give birth, are they also being forced to become pregnant? Remove the option of abortion and you will see women taking birth control more seriously.

Legalizing abortion in the first place was immense government overreach. There is nothing in the Constitution which give anyone the right to kill and unborn human.

"Save, legal and rare" has gotten over 63 million lives snuffed out since Roe v. Wade.

And Roe v. Wade isn't about deciding to "have a child or not," it's about deciding to kill your child in the womb. It's not about a medical procedure, it's not about privacy, it's about death. Stop the deaths of the innocent.
Safe, Legal, and Rare was a bumper sticker one liner Democrats used to lie to the public to get elected and reelected.
 
You can't be pro-abortion and pro-life. You are promoting abortion which is solving a "problem" with death.
Worth repeating. At least two humans with their own bodies are always involved in abortion but only one has a voice and a vote and it's not the one who will be killed.
 
PP has historically been at the forefront of stopping unwanted pregnancies and STDs. This organization makes abortion available as a last resort, not a first option.

Why these johnny-come-lately efforts by people calling themselves Christians? These "Christians" have been at the forefront of keeping people, particularly girls, ignorant about their bodies, about sexuality itself, and about contraception.

Abstinence education was the most stupid idea to hit the streets in a long time, but the "abstinence only" bimbos who call themselves "Christians" made millions off of the American taxpayer by pushing it, including people who have been placed by trump on the federal government payroll, all the while sacrificing girls and women so that they could deliver unspoiled meat to fundie men with certain sexual predilections.

Women and girls need good, practical advice, backed by solid medical findings, on their issues relating to sexuality and reproductive choices. They should never turn to people who call themselves "Christians" since these people have proven themselves untrustworthy and, well, liars. PP has been reliable all along.
Abortion is an industry. PP was caught selling aborted babies. Abortion isn't a last resort it's death for profit.
 
PP doesn't receive federal funds. Sex-boy (mr. ED) pigpence took care of that.

Why should the availability of an abortion be the difference between receiving federal funds or not, anyway?
Are you really that uniformed or just an unapologetic liar?


 

Forum List

Back
Top