Republican pollster Frank Luntz has a solid plan for convincing the anti-science crowd to vaccinate

DrLove

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2016
37,715
19,904
1,915
Central Oregon Coast
Say what you will about the wordmeister who created misleading policy titles such as "Clear Skies" and "Healthy Forests" for Dubya - He's not stupid. :)

The good news, according to Luntz, is that these Americans trust their doctors and can be convinced with a positive message about the benefits and safety of the vaccines, not the risks of skipping it.​
“The most impactful message is how the vaccine will reduce the government’s restrictions on our lives and our freedoms," Luntz wrote in a polling memo. "Without widespread vaccination, mask mandates and personal lockdowns will continue.”​
Prevention and protection were also effective messages, Luntz found, such as comparing the vaccine to wearing a seat belt and telling people it could prevent tens of thousands of deaths. To assuage concerns about safety, he suggested reminding people that nearly every doctor has chosen to take it.​

 
Say what you will about the wordmeister who created misleading policy titles such as "Clear Skies" and "Healthy Forests" for Dubya - He's not stupid. :)

The good news, according to Luntz, is that these Americans trust their doctors and can be convinced with a positive message about the benefits and safety of the vaccines, not the risks of skipping it.​
“The most impactful message is how the vaccine will reduce the government’s restrictions on our lives and our freedoms," Luntz wrote in a polling memo. "Without widespread vaccination, mask mandates and personal lockdowns will continue.”​
Prevention and protection were also effective messages, Luntz found, such as comparing the vaccine to wearing a seat belt and telling people it could prevent tens of thousands of deaths. To assuage concerns about safety, he suggested reminding people that nearly every doctor has chosen to take it.​


From the INTERNAL link you didn't see are these words:

From a POLL results,

"A full 78% of all respondents said they may eventually get vaccinated. When asked if they would wait days, weeks, months, a year, or more than a year after it was available to them, 50% said they would wait months, and only 21% said more than a year."

:oops-28:

The Article never actually show how many are not going to get vaccinated, it beats around the bushes with a bunch of media babble.
 
Anti-science crowd? Is that referring to the people who like their medical treatments fully tested and approved by the FDA? The ones who are not comfortable being guinea pigs for a brand new treatment that tricks your genetic system into creating a protein that tricks your immune system into a response? The treatment that has never been used before and never tested for long term effects? Why would anyone want to wait for tests of long term effects of something that fucks around with their genetic and immune systems?
 
Anti-science crowd? Is that referring to the people who like their medical treatments fully tested and approved by the FDA? The ones who are not comfortable being guinea pigs for a brand new treatment that tricks your genetic system into creating a protein that tricks your immune system into a response? The treatment that has never been used before and never tested for long term effects? Why would anyone want to wait for tests of long term effects of something that fucks around with their genetic and immune systems?

So be a fool and don't vaccinate - Just please stay away from the rest of us. ;)
 
Sadly, many folks will still listen to the fearmongering, mistrust and propaganda from the Dems nominee for VP, Ms. Harris....and still not take the vaccine
 
Anti-science crowd? Is that referring to the people who like their medical treatments fully tested and approved by the FDA? The ones who are not comfortable being guinea pigs for a brand new treatment that tricks your genetic system into creating a protein that tricks your immune system into a response? The treatment that has never been used before and never tested for long term effects? Why would anyone want to wait for tests of long term effects of something that fucks around with their genetic and immune systems?

Always remember, and always point it out, whenever anyone from the left wrong tries to lay any claim to “science”, that theirs is the “science” that asserts that Bruce Jenner is a woman.
 
Say what you will about the wordmeister who created misleading policy titles such as "Clear Skies" and "Healthy Forests" for Dubya - He's not stupid. :)

The good news, according to Luntz, is that these Americans trust their doctors and can be convinced with a positive message about the benefits and safety of the vaccines, not the risks of skipping it.​
“The most impactful message is how the vaccine will reduce the government’s restrictions on our lives and our freedoms," Luntz wrote in a polling memo. "Without widespread vaccination, mask mandates and personal lockdowns will continue.”​
Prevention and protection were also effective messages, Luntz found, such as comparing the vaccine to wearing a seat belt and telling people it could prevent tens of thousands of deaths. To assuage concerns about safety, he suggested reminding people that nearly every doctor has chosen to take it.​

They'd have to be told that by a trusted source, i.e., someone in their universe.

Even then many of them are too paranoid, of course.
 
Say what you will about the wordmeister who created misleading policy titles such as "Clear Skies" and "Healthy Forests" for Dubya - He's not stupid. :)

The good news, according to Luntz, is that these Americans trust their doctors and can be convinced with a positive message about the benefits and safety of the vaccines, not the risks of skipping it.​
“The most impactful message is how the vaccine will reduce the government’s restrictions on our lives and our freedoms," Luntz wrote in a polling memo. "Without widespread vaccination, mask mandates and personal lockdowns will continue.”​
Prevention and protection were also effective messages, Luntz found, such as comparing the vaccine to wearing a seat belt and telling people it could prevent tens of thousands of deaths. To assuage concerns about safety, he suggested reminding people that nearly every doctor has chosen to take it.​

Was it "science" when Fauci told you masks dont work?
 
Was it "science" when Fauci told you masks dont work?

Dr Fauci said that in early March when we a) knew very little about this novel virus and b) needed to save PPE which was in short supply for first responders. Please cut it out with your preposterous disinformation.
 
Last edited:
Say what you will about the wordmeister who created misleading policy titles such as "Clear Skies" and "Healthy Forests" for Dubya - He's not stupid. :)

The good news, according to Luntz, is that these Americans trust their doctors and can be convinced with a positive message about the benefits and safety of the vaccines, not the risks of skipping it.​
“The most impactful message is how the vaccine will reduce the government’s restrictions on our lives and our freedoms," Luntz wrote in a polling memo. "Without widespread vaccination, mask mandates and personal lockdowns will continue.”​
Prevention and protection were also effective messages, Luntz found, such as comparing the vaccine to wearing a seat belt and telling people it could prevent tens of thousands of deaths. To assuage concerns about safety, he suggested reminding people that nearly every doctor has chosen to take it.​

They'd have to be told that by a trusted source, i.e., someone in their universe.

Even then many of them are too paranoid, of course.

Agree - But if their own doctors and preachers tell the bastards to vax the hell up because it will DECREASE restrictions on their lives and their freedoms while potentially saving their lives - It COULD make a difference.
 
Say what you will about the wordmeister who created misleading policy titles such as "Clear Skies" and "Healthy Forests" for Dubya - He's not stupid. :)

The good news, according to Luntz, is that these Americans trust their doctors and can be convinced with a positive message about the benefits and safety of the vaccines, not the risks of skipping it.​
“The most impactful message is how the vaccine will reduce the government’s restrictions on our lives and our freedoms," Luntz wrote in a polling memo. "Without widespread vaccination, mask mandates and personal lockdowns will continue.”​
Prevention and protection were also effective messages, Luntz found, such as comparing the vaccine to wearing a seat belt and telling people it could prevent tens of thousands of deaths. To assuage concerns about safety, he suggested reminding people that nearly every doctor has chosen to take it.​

They'd have to be told that by a trusted source, i.e., someone in their universe.

Even then many of them are too paranoid, of course.

Agree - But if their own doctors and preachers tell the bastards to vax the hell up because it will DECREASE restrictions on their lives and their freedoms while potentially saving their lives - It COULD make a difference.
Yeah. Anything would help, for sure, if only a few crawl out of their hole.
 
Anti-science crowd? Is that referring to the people who like their medical treatments fully tested and approved by the FDA? The ones who are not comfortable being guinea pigs for a brand new treatment that tricks your genetic system into creating a protein that tricks your immune system into a response? The treatment that has never been used before and never tested for long term effects? Why would anyone want to wait for tests of long term effects of something that fucks around with their genetic and immune systems?

Always remember, and always point it out, whenever anyone from the left wrong tries to lay any claim to “science”, that theirs is the “science” that asserts that Bruce Jenner is a woman.


"A male in a dress is a female" - science respecters
 
Agree - But if their own doctors and preachers tell the bastards to vax the hell up because it will DECREASE restrictions on their lives and their freedoms while potentially saving their lives - It COULD make a difference.
Yeah. Anything would help, for sure, if only a few crawl out of their hole.

I would prefer they crawl BACK in their holes ;)
 
Anti-science crowd? Is that referring to the people who like their medical treatments fully tested and approved by the FDA? The ones who are not comfortable being guinea pigs for a brand new treatment that tricks your genetic system into creating a protein that tricks your immune system into a response? The treatment that has never been used before and never tested for long term effects? Why would anyone want to wait for tests of long term effects of something that fucks around with their genetic and immune systems?

So be a fool and don't vaccinate - Just please stay away from the rest of us. ;)
Feel free to run away when you see us approaching.
 
But true liberals cannot exist without the hand of "Big Government" to guide their every decision, their every move. Surely if the vaccine would lift even the pinkie finger of that "guidance" they'd be putting all they are at mortal risk by vaccinating! They must stay vulnerable to death by Covid to stay alive as Democrats!
 
Say what you will about the wordmeister who created misleading policy titles such as "Clear Skies" and "Healthy Forests" for Dubya - He's not stupid. :)

The good news, according to Luntz, is that these Americans trust their doctors and can be convinced with a positive message about the benefits and safety of the vaccines, not the risks of skipping it.​
“The most impactful message is how the vaccine will reduce the government’s restrictions on our lives and our freedoms," Luntz wrote in a polling memo. "Without widespread vaccination, mask mandates and personal lockdowns will continue.”​
Prevention and protection were also effective messages, Luntz found, such as comparing the vaccine to wearing a seat belt and telling people it could prevent tens of thousands of deaths. To assuage concerns about safety, he suggested reminding people that nearly every doctor has chosen to take it.​


From the INTERNAL link you didn't see are these words:

From a POLL results,

"A full 78% of all respondents said they may eventually get vaccinated. When asked if they would wait days, weeks, months, a year, or more than a year after it was available to them, 50% said they would wait months, and only 21% said more than a year."

:oops-28:

The Article never actually show how many are not going to get vaccinated, it beats around the bushes with a bunch of media babble.
Screw luntz and fuck the nazi democrat mayors and governors
 
Anti-science crowd? Is that referring to the people who like their medical treatments fully tested and approved by the FDA? The ones who are not comfortable being guinea pigs for a brand new treatment that tricks your genetic system into creating a protein that tricks your immune system into a response? The treatment that has never been used before and never tested for long term effects? Why would anyone want to wait for tests of long term effects of something that fucks around with their genetic and immune systems?

So be a fool and don't vaccinate - Just please stay away from the rest of us. ;)
Feel free to run away when you see us approaching.

I shall keep my distance when you approach me with your spittle. Kinda like pointing a gun loaded up with variants that could kill even the vaccinated. You are a fucking Petri Dish for variants so kindly piss off.
 
Apparently there are no democrat pollsters but somehow Luntz is labeled a republican pollster. How does that work?

Catch up please. There are dozens if not hundreds of Democrat pollsters.
Is Luntz shredding your perception of Big Lies from Anti-Vaxers?
If so, please don't be butthurt. ;)
 
I shall keep my distance when you approach me with your spittle. Kinda like pointing a gun loaded up with variants that could kill even the vaccinated. You are a fucking Petri Dish for variants so kindly piss off.

xtrca17wmo051.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top