Republican Congressman Calls For Investigation Why He Can’t See Hunter Biden’s Penis. Perv.

skews13

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2017
9,426
11,822
2,265
Oversight Committee Chair James Comer is calling former Twitter executives in for a public hearing on why, in the runup to the 2020 elections, Twitter suppressed sharing of some information from a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden. Some of that was emails ostensibly hinting at involvement by Joe Biden in his son’s business dealings. But a lot of it—a lot of what trolls really wanted to spread all over Twitter, and what Elon Musk’s pet “Twitter files” guy Matt Taibbi was outraged had been suppressed—was, uh, intimate photographs of Hunter Biden. Dick pics, to be precise. And those pictures were being posted in a concerted campaign led by a Steve Bannon associate.

Comer, not at all coincidentally, is the same guy who, as ranking member on the oversight committee, released a memo trying to defend Washington Commanders team owner Dan Snyder on the rampant sexual harassment in his organization, including in that memo pictures of some of the victims of that harassment that their lawyers described as “sexualized and salacious photographs of former cheerleaders.”

So here’s a guy who recently put “sexualized and salacious photographs” in one official document, and now he’s asking why Twitter didn’t allow the posting of nude photos of a man without his consent as a political weapon against the man’s father. There’s a pattern with Comer, and it’s pretty gross.


What a sick Individual this guy is.
 
Oversight Committee Chair James Comer is calling former Twitter executives in for a public hearing on why, in the runup to the 2020 elections, Twitter suppressed sharing of some information from a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden. Some of that was emails ostensibly hinting at involvement by Joe Biden in his son’s business dealings. But a lot of it—a lot of what trolls really wanted to spread all over Twitter, and what Elon Musk’s pet “Twitter files” guy Matt Taibbi was outraged had been suppressed—was, uh, intimate photographs of Hunter Biden. Dick pics, to be precise. And those pictures were being posted in a concerted campaign led by a Steve Bannon associate.

Comer, not at all coincidentally, is the same guy who, as ranking member on the oversight committee, released a memo trying to defend Washington Commanders team owner Dan Snyder on the rampant sexual harassment in his organization, including in that memo pictures of some of the victims of that harassment that their lawyers described as “sexualized and salacious photographs of former cheerleaders.”

So here’s a guy who recently put “sexualized and salacious photographs” in one official document, and now he’s asking why Twitter didn’t allow the posting of nude photos of a man without his consent as a political weapon against the man’s father. There’s a pattern with Comer, and it’s pretty gross.


What a sick Individual this guy is.
why do democrats always start threads about mens dicks.....get a life already and find a gay porn site buttigieg
 
The way this thread is editorialized is a prime example of why this discussion board shouldn't be used as a server/host for the usership of dedicated activist platforms like dailykos.

It's the equivalent of linking some stupid asshole's post from another forum on here in an OP as a source.
 
Last edited:
why do democrats always start threads about mens dicks.....get a life already and find a gay porn site buttigieg

If this congressman making it public for an investigation wanting to see Hunter Biden dick bothers you, you should call the Capitol, and file a complaint with the ethics committee.

Unless of course you support this guy. Then send him a thank you note. :aargh:
 
Oversight Committee Chair James Comer is calling former Twitter executives in for a public hearing on why, in the runup to the 2020 elections, Twitter suppressed sharing of some information from a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden. Some of that was emails ostensibly hinting at involvement by Joe Biden in his son’s business dealings. But a lot of it—a lot of what trolls really wanted to spread all over Twitter, and what Elon Musk’s pet “Twitter files” guy Matt Taibbi was outraged had been suppressed—was, uh, intimate photographs of Hunter Biden. Dick pics, to be precise. And those pictures were being posted in a concerted campaign led by a Steve Bannon associate.

Comer, not at all coincidentally, is the same guy who, as ranking member on the oversight committee, released a memo trying to defend Washington Commanders team owner Dan Snyder on the rampant sexual harassment in his organization, including in that memo pictures of some of the victims of that harassment that their lawyers described as “sexualized and salacious photographs of former cheerleaders.”

So here’s a guy who recently put “sexualized and salacious photographs” in one official document, and now he’s asking why Twitter didn’t allow the posting of nude photos of a man without his consent as a political weapon against the man’s father. There’s a pattern with Comer, and it’s pretty gross.


What a sick Individual this guy is.
Well, it is the GQP....
 
The way this thread is editorialized is a prime example of why this discussion board shouldn't be used as a server/host for dedicated activist platforms like dailykos.

It's the equivalent of linking some stupid asshole's post from another forum on here in an OP as a source
Every one of Skew's retarded posts should be sent directly to the basement.
 
why do democrats always start threads about mens dicks.....get a life already and find a gay porn site buttigieg
I am surprised he didn't post it in Current Event, as the Daily Kos article is dated today and 10:29 or in Politics.
 
If this congressman making it public for an investigation wanting to see Hunter Biden dick bothers you, you should call the Capitol, and file a complaint with the ethics committee.

Unless of course you support this guy. Then send him a thank you note. :aargh:
Sounds like you are already sending him flowers.
 
Oversight Committee Chair James Comer is calling former Twitter executives in for a public hearing on why, in the runup to the 2020 elections, Twitter suppressed sharing of some information from a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden. Some of that was emails ostensibly hinting at involvement by Joe Biden in his son’s business dealings. But a lot of it—a lot of what trolls really wanted to spread all over Twitter, and what Elon Musk’s pet “Twitter files” guy Matt Taibbi was outraged had been suppressed—was, uh, intimate photographs of Hunter Biden. Dick pics, to be precise. And those pictures were being posted in a concerted campaign led by a Steve Bannon associate.

Comer, not at all coincidentally, is the same guy who, as ranking member on the oversight committee, released a memo trying to defend Washington Commanders team owner Dan Snyder on the rampant sexual harassment in his organization, including in that memo pictures of some of the victims of that harassment that their lawyers described as “sexualized and salacious photographs of former cheerleaders.”

So here’s a guy who recently put “sexualized and salacious photographs” in one official document, and now he’s asking why Twitter didn’t allow the posting of nude photos of a man without his consent as a political weapon against the man’s father. There’s a pattern with Comer, and it’s pretty gross.


What a sick Individual this guy is.
This is my "surprised Pikachu face".
 
Fuckboy probably wants to know what crime family dick looks like.

Call it a morbid curiosity.

Use your imagination:

hunted rubbing one out.jpg
 
Oversight Committee Chair James Comer is calling former Twitter executives in for a public hearing on why, in the runup to the 2020 elections, Twitter suppressed sharing of some information from a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden. Some of that was emails ostensibly hinting at involvement by Joe Biden in his son’s business dealings. But a lot of it—a lot of what trolls really wanted to spread all over Twitter, and what Elon Musk’s pet “Twitter files” guy Matt Taibbi was outraged had been suppressed—was, uh, intimate photographs of Hunter Biden. Dick pics, to be precise. And those pictures were being posted in a concerted campaign led by a Steve Bannon associate.

Comer, not at all coincidentally, is the same guy who, as ranking member on the oversight committee, released a memo trying to defend Washington Commanders team owner Dan Snyder on the rampant sexual harassment in his organization, including in that memo pictures of some of the victims of that harassment that their lawyers described as “sexualized and salacious photographs of former cheerleaders.”

So here’s a guy who recently put “sexualized and salacious photographs” in one official document, and now he’s asking why Twitter didn’t allow the posting of nude photos of a man without his consent as a political weapon against the man’s father. There’s a pattern with Comer, and it’s pretty gross.


What a sick Individual this guy is.
A meritless, bad faith, partisan 'investigation.'
 
I am surprised he didn't post it in Current Event, as the Daily Kos article is dated today and 10:29 or in Politics.

As long as I've been here, one thing rings true. No matter where threads are put. It always seems to be in the wrong place when it upsets certain moderators feminine sensibilities.

As far as the topic of the thread goes. It is directly related to a CONGRESSMAN, wanting to conduct an investigation by a CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, posted in a site room entitled CONGRESS.

Imagine that.
 
As long as I've been here, one thing rings true. No matter where threads are put. It always seems to be in the wrong place when it upsets certain moderators feminine sensibilities.

As far as the topic of the thread goes. It is directly related to a CONGRESSMAN, wanting to conduct an investigation by a CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, posted in a site room entitled CONGRESS.

Imagine that.
Oh, it's fine where it is. I have just always thought current event and Politics were the biggest draw in forums here.

I don't think they have too many ideas on governance, so investigations is kind of all they got. It took them longer than any congress since the early 1800s just to pick a leader, as the one they seemed to like best said, "Oh, hell no" and a small minority took a week to get their sht together and get out of the way of the one the majority wanted, if they had no ideas or knew anybody that could get more than a couple of vote. These people are lame. Real losers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top