Making a living on disenfranchisement? It is CNN and not some internet rag that is putting this out....?
What ye say, the Obama Fans? Is this man really the Candidate of Change? I know you all that have been arguing this debate with me on various different threads have probably seen me as a pain in the butt on this subject, but I have always been taught that you fight tooth and nail for what you believe in and when you fail, you pick yourself up, and try again...
Hillary is the better/stronger candidate, Dems will lose in November, if Obama is our Candidate imo and I will believe this till proven otherwise....he is the weakest link....And it will come out as such, and we will be regretting not having Hillary in this electoral competition with Republicans.
What ye say, the Obama Fans? Is this man really the Candidate of Change? I know you all that have been arguing this debate with me on various different threads have probably seen me as a pain in the butt on this subject, but I have always been taught that you fight tooth and nail for what you believe in and when you fail, you pick yourself up, and try again...
Hillary is the better/stronger candidate, Dems will lose in November, if Obama is our Candidate imo and I will believe this till proven otherwise....he is the weakest link....And it will come out as such, and we will be regretting not having Hillary in this electoral competition with Republicans.
In his first race for office, seeking a state Senate seat on Chicago's gritty South Side in 1996, Obama effectively used election rules to eliminate his Democratic competition.
As a community organizer, he had helped register thousands of voters. But when it came time to run for office, he employed Chicago rules to invalidate the voting petition signatures of three of his challengers.
The move denied each of them, including incumbent Alice Palmer, a longtime Chicago activist, a place on the ballot. It cleared the way for Obama to run unopposed on the Democratic ticket in a heavily Democrat district.
"That was Chicago politics," said John Kass, a veteran Chicago Tribune columnist. "Knock out your opposition, challenge their petitions, destroy your enemy, right? It is how Barack Obama destroyed his enemies back in 1996 that conflicts with his message today. He may have gotten his start registering thousands of voters. But in that first race, he made sure voters had just one choice."
Obama's challenge was perfectly legal, said Jay Stewart of the Chicago's Better Government Association. Although records of the challenges are no longer on file for review with the election board, Stewart said Obama is not the only politician to resort to petition challenges to eliminate the competition.
"He came from Chicago politics," Stewart said. "Politics ain't beanbag, as they say in Chicago. You play with your elbows up, and you're pretty tough and ruthless when you have to be. Sen. Obama felt that's what was necessary at the time, that's what he did. Does it fit in with the rhetoric now? Perhaps not."
The Obama campaign called this report "a hit job." It insisted that CNN talk to a state representative who supports Obama, because, according to an Obama spokesman, she would be objective. But when we called her, she said she can't recall details of petition challenges, who engineered them for the Obama campaign or why all the candidates were challenged.
Read the whole article: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/index.html?eref=rss_politics