Repairing the Rule of Law: An Agenda for Post-Trump Reform

"As the U.S. begins to see the light at the end of the Trumpian tunnel, it is time to begin thinking about the issue of repair. One should not assume the result of the election, but it is nonetheless worth asking the question: What should be done in a post-Trump world to restore the rule of law?

Of Trump’s many excesses, his assault on legal norms has to rank high in terms of damage to fundamental values that form the fabric of America. His attacks on the free press, the independent judiciary and the independence of the Department of Justice have all created significant damage. His abuse of executive discretionary authority has made a mockery of the concept of checks and balances. His gaming of the judicial system has revealed weaknesses in our legal process. His attempts to place himself (and his family and his business interests) above the law have called into question foundational national conceptions of equal justice. In short, President Trump has led a wrecking crew (aided and abetted by William Barr and Mitch McConnell) that has severely damaged American legal norms of behavior."

I've heard a number of suggestions along the lines of what should be done. Some including a commission to identify weakness in the laws governing a prez's behavior Trump has exploited. Some recommending a type of tribunal to hold people like Billy the Bagman accountable for the extra-legal path he has taken the DoJ down.

Whatever the method one thing is clear. The US can never allow legal and ethical ambiguities to enable a prez to abuse the office as the Orange Menace has.
What is interesting is that what the president has done, is the relinquishing of powers to the president by the feckless Congress under then Obama. Didnt seem that you Progs had any problem with that, until the sick bitch Hitlery lost and it was found out how corrupt the swamp creatures are still in that government entity with the ABOVE THE LAW , Nan from San Fransicko, doing what she does while telling everyone else not to.
Yes, the democrats should be minding their P's and Q's, especially if it would compare and contrast more favorably for the left.

What the right wing forgets is that Obama actually understood our Constitution and was able to practice diplomacy.
Yea, Obama brought slavery back to Africa because he was a puppet. Even Obama's own brother , Malik, turned to TRUMP.


BY CASEY GANE
DECEMBER 1, 2017
HOW SLAVERY CAME BACK TO LIBYA

"Still, the question remains: How did Libya become a place where slavery is permitted? Ironically the decisions made by a Black man, Barack Obama, and a white woman, Hillary Clinton, to take out a Pan-African leader, Muammar Qadaffi, led to both the resurrection slavery for Africans, and a reversal of progress in women’s rights."
He was man enough to admit his mistake, unlike Your guy.

Barack Obama has said the biggest mistake of his presidency was the lack of planning for the aftermath of Muammar Gaddafi’s ouster in Libya that left the country spiralling into chaos and coming under threat from violent extremists.--https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/12/barack-obama-says-libya-was-worst-mistake-of-his-presidency
I would argue that Obama's worst mistake of his presidency was the decision to withdraw US combat troops from the Middle East unleashing ISIS on a defenseless civilian population! That caused the deaths of countless people and the forced migration of millions! But hey, with Barry there are SO MANY mistakes to choose from! It's hard to pick just one!
I agree to disagree. If military presence is so important, why are right wingers and their republican cohorts so unwilling to pay real times of War, Tax Rates for them? Tax cut economics gives the lie to the right wing.
 
You on the other hand seem to see this string as an opportunity to trot out all of the things that liberals TRIED to accuse Trump of and then failed miserably to prove during the impeachment hearings!
Yet, it was Your guy who obstructed the investigations and denied and disparaged executive department personnel from testifying. Why if nothing wrong was going on?
Would you like to attempt to make the case that the Trump Administration was more "obstructive" of investigations than the Obama Administration was? I'd be happy to go down THAT road with you, Daniel. Barack Obama's administration set the bar for refusing to cooperate with investigations into it's activities! Trump's doesn't even come CLOSE to what Barry's crew gave us for eight years!
How many executive department personnel did Obama forbid to testify to Congressional oversight committees?
Well for starters, Barry's Attorney General was cited for contempt of Congress for refusing to testify about the Fast & Furious scandal!
But not an actual impeachment inquiry. Why, if nothing wrong was going on?
Because Nancy Pelosi controlled the House? Duh?
Right wingers prefer to impeach over blowjobs.
 
If lefties have to ask about "post Trump reform" it must mean sleepy Joe hasn't developed an agenda. Under Trump we had a roaring economy and relative peace in the world. Isn't that what it's all about? I shudder to imagine what the word "reform" means to lefties.
 
If lefties have to ask about "post Trump reform" it must mean sleepy Joe hasn't developed an agenda. Under Trump we had a roaring economy and relative peace in the world. Isn't that what it's all about? I shudder to imagine what the word "reform" means to lefties.
Taking credit for a previous administrations Continuing Trends is what right wingers are best at.
 
"Back in 2012 (before the age of Trump), I thought this grant of emergency authority was a wise decision, writing that “any President of either party should not be presumed to exercise powers granted in a dictatorial way.” And in the run-up to Trump’s election, I wondered if we could extend the same presumption to a putative President Trump.

Today, the answer to that question seems obvious. The fundamental norm to presume a lack of malevolent intent is now in doubt. And that, in turn, means that the entire postwar architecture of federal power—congressional legislation backed by executive discretion—is also in doubt."
It was Progressive George W Bush who gave US the FISA warrants which many of US disagreed with because it would be used against US citizens, yet the progs didnt listen and we saw it used by the brown turd Obammy. And you dumbasses want to go back to that shit?
Here is some more shit under Obama/BIDEN.













Most of these Radical Muzzies murders were called work place violence. Today the Muzzies are cowering in fear of this President and should be, because he let our military take it to them and we havent seen a "work place violence" now for the 4 years of President Trumps office. You know why? Because you radical Progs are doing the dirty work that once Muzzies did.

Liberal%2BTerrorism.jpg
 
“Mandatory disclosure of presidential candidate tax returns and strengthening of presidential financial disclosure.“

This is one suggestion that I support and think should be extended to all candidates for federal office, all Congressional members, all cabinet members, and all heads of departments of the federal government.
I would also suggest full public disclosure of wealth and income, and publication of annual income tax filings for all the above.

The question of increasing power of the President over other branches of government is addressed in this article in a reformist way. It ought not be addressed as a partisan matter at all.
 
"As the U.S. begins to see the light at the end of the Trumpian tunnel, it is time to begin thinking about the issue of repair. One should not assume the result of the election, but it is nonetheless worth asking the question: What should be done in a post-Trump world to restore the rule of law?

Of Trump’s many excesses, his assault on legal norms has to rank high in terms of damage to fundamental values that form the fabric of America. His attacks on the free press, the independent judiciary and the independence of the Department of Justice have all created significant damage. His abuse of executive discretionary authority has made a mockery of the concept of checks and balances. His gaming of the judicial system has revealed weaknesses in our legal process. His attempts to place himself (and his family and his business interests) above the law have called into question foundational national conceptions of equal justice. In short, President Trump has led a wrecking crew (aided and abetted by William Barr and Mitch McConnell) that has severely damaged American legal norms of behavior."

I've heard a number of suggestions along the lines of what should be done. Some including a commission to identify weakness in the laws governing a prez's behavior Trump has exploited. Some recommending a type of tribunal to hold people like Billy the Bagman accountable for the extra-legal path he has taken the DoJ down.

Whatever the method one thing is clear. The US can never allow legal and ethical ambiguities to enable a prez to abuse the office as the Orange Menace has.
Excellent article.

Repairing the damage to the rule of law caused by Trump should indeed be a priority.
 

Forum List

Back
Top